Posts Tagged ‘TV’

TV maker Vizio turns to computers, takes on Apple

May 23rd, 2012

Vizio is no stranger to defying the odds.

Consumers don’t have to wait long to see Vizio launch what could be one of the biggest disruptions to the computer business in years. The Irvine, Calif.-based company, located in an area between Los Angeles and San Diego, down the road from a Christmas tree farm, plans next month to launch a line of computers. It will sell two ulta-thin notebooks, a laptop and two desktop computers that feature high-style design. And leveraging its household name in millions of living rooms, its computers will be designed to be easy to set up and get going right out of the box.

The pitch is simple: Vizio aims to give consumers computers a fit and finish that rivals Apple’s Macintosh, yet running the familiar Microsoft Windows software that powers 90% of the world’s computers. Vizio plans to pull this off with a lineup of stylish computers in carefully machined aluminum bodies carved by robots. And as it did with its flat-screen TVs, it will do so at competitive prices.

“PCs have become a sea of black plastic,” says Vizio Chief Technology Officer Matt McRae, describing the lineup of Windows-based computers from other manufacturers, many of which focus on corporate customers where design is an afterthought. “We’re building a product people want.”

Vizio gets input from suppliers

In the process, Vizio has torn up the playbook on how PCs are designed and marketed. It is pioneering a sort of casual joint venture, which gives makers of parts that go inside the computers great say in how the system is designed.

Vizio is taking the role of a general contractor, overseeing the big-picture but relying on partners for technical help. The computers’ innards are optimized with suggestions from Microsoft and Intel, the companies that know the key components best and spend billions annually on research and development. Vizio has just a few hundred employees, and a small staff of engineers.

“Vizio is doing a good job listening and taking advice from the experiences on how to optimize hardware and software,” says Steve Guggenheimer, vice president of Microsoft’s OEM division, adding that Microsoft is willing to provide technical assistance to any of its partners.

Intel collaborates with all the PC makers that use its chips. But Vizio contacted the computer chipmaker very early in the process and “wanted to learn all we had to teach them,” says Intel’s Gary Richman, director of marketing for the PC client solution division that cooks up innovated designs that use the company’s chips.

That leaves Vizio to focus on the consumer experience, making sure the PC looks and works the way it should, right from the get-go. As evidence of its commitment to consumers over profit, it’s forsaking the industry’s long practice of loading new computers with “crapware” software, which they’re paid to install, but that many times hurt the performance of the computers.

The company also plans to “in source” all the technical support. If consumers call with questions, they will talk to a trained professional at Vizio’s consumer service center in Dakota Dunes, S.D. — not a call center in India or the Philippines.

Plane crash lends perspective
It might be tempting to scoff at Vizio. After all, the privately owned company has just 409 employees. Vizio was co-founded in 2002 by William Wang, now 48, an entrepreneur who created a number of companies, including several computer monitor businesses in the 1990s, among them a company called Princeton Graphics. Later, in 2001, Wang worked with Gateway, a former customer and a popular computer seller in the 1990s, to sell big-screen TVs in the retail stores operated by the computer maker. Wang and 95 others famously survived the crash of a 747 airplane taking off for a flight across the Pacific Ocean. Eighty-three people died in the crash, an experience, he said in an e-mailed response, that has helped him keep the pressure of life in perspective.

“Prior to the crash I worried about business issues every day. The crash allowed me to see the world from a different perspective, eliminating the fear that often limits innovation,” he said in the e-mail. Getting into the PC business is just the latest way Wang hopes to push innovation. “We are entering the PC market because I know consumers want a high-quality and beautifully designed personal computer that is affordable,” he says. “We asked the question, ‘Why can’t we deliver smart industrial design and performance without a price premium?’ ”

But even with its rapid success in TVs, how can it have a chance taking on Hewlett-Packard, Dell and of course Apple, which has grown to become the most valuable U.S. company and is sitting on almost $100 billion in cash and investments?

Making things even more tricky for Vizio is the fact the market for laptops has been stagnant, and as more consumers look to tablets as their go-to devices for e-mail and Web browsing. Vizio also must deal with the fact Apple might encroach on its turf, too. Apple is widely expected to release some sort of TV set, although no details are known.

Vizio is used to taking on difficult tasks, though. When it entered the TV business, the segment was considered to be crowded and mature. But while there were many TVs and TV makers, it turned out that there was a way to do it for less, while maintaining quality.

Consumers’ positive association with Vizio’s TVs and the company’s relationships with big retailers such as Costco and Wal-Mart will certainly give it a fighting chance, says James Kelleher of Argus Research.
Vizio has work cut out for it

There’s no shortage of critics, though. “It’s crazy talk, as far as them competing with Apple,” says James Ragan of Crowell Weedon. Initially, the company might make inroads against Dell and HP in the consumer market, but Vizio still doesn’t have a strong answer to Apple’s iPad tablet computer, which is where the industry’s growth is, he says. “It’s going to be tough for them,” he says.

Not to mention that Apple is successfully locking consumers into a network of devices that starts with them buying a smartphone but branches into other devices and purchases from Apple’s online market for music. Vizio is “not just up against the Apple brand, it’s up against an ecosystem,” says William Choi of Janney Montgomery Scott.

The idea that Vizio could challenge Apple is “ridiculous,” says Andy Hargreaves, analyst at Pacific Crest, who responded to USA TODAY via e-mail. “Unlike the TV market at the time Vizio entered, the PC market is already entirely outsourced and Apple has advantages on component purchasing,” he writes. “Vizio has as much chance as I do in being more cost-efficient than Apple in its production.”

But Vizio’s McRae says the company has heard similar criticism before. Giving consumers what they want, they will be successful. “We have the view of what consumers want,” he says. “We’ve built a different product on an open ecosystem.”

Source:http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/retail/story/2012-05-22/vizio-takes-on-apple-computers/55143066/1

Sony Google TV hardware reaching Europe in September, says Les Echos

April 3rd, 2012

A report in French newspaper Les Echos has said that Sony is planning to launch hardware based on the Google TV media platform in France in September, suggesting that the manufacturer has slipped on the summer launch it promised back in January. Les Echos confirms that two products are initially expected to launch — a standalone set-top box, anticipated to cost around €200 (almost $270) on launch; as well as a Blu Ray player, likely the NSZ-GT1 it showed off in London, which is set to launch for €300 (or around $400). While the report confirms the September launch for France, it also suggests that the UK, Spain, and Germany could also see the hardware at the same time.

The article suggests that the remotes will have a dedicated “Google Play” button, providing quick access to Google’s content portal, as well as access to Sony’s Video Unlimited and Music Unlimited services. There’s also mention of Google Music — currently unavailable outside of the US — though no further details are offered.

There summer launch window was also given by Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt in a speech to the LeWeb conference in December, where he said that, “by the summer of 2012, the majority of the televisions you see in stores will have Google TV embedded.” With Sony the only manufacturer currently selling Google TV-based products, it seems like this is a promise that’s likely to go unfulfilled.

Source:http://www.theverge.com/2012/4/2/2919994/sony-google-tv-europe-september

Apple brings movies to iCloud, upgrades Apple TV

March 8th, 2012

Apple is making it easier for people who buy movies through iTunes to play them on the various devices they own.

Apple said Wednesday that customers can now save some movies on its iCloud remote storage service. That system lets devices such as the iPad and the iPhone retrieve content wirelessly. Before, if you bought a movie on one device to play on another, you needed to connect both to a personal computer with a physical cord. iCloud does away with that.

The change also means people will be able to watch purchased movies on an improved Apple TV set-top box going on sale next week.

That development should allay frustration consumers have had with digital purchases of movies, which could be bought on iPads and iPhones, but couldn’t be stored on the Apple TV device because it has no hard drive. Apple TV owners had been limited to renting movies until now.

“iCloud now supports movies, starting today,” Apple CEO Tim Cook said at a packed presentation in San Francisco.

Previously, Apple’s iCloud saved only users’ songs, photos and documents on its computer servers.

Apple’s head of Internet services, Eddy Cue, demonstrated how the movie system would work using a new Apple TV set-top box. The device will now be able to play movies in the “1080p” format, the highest-resolution video standard in common use. Previously, Apple TV could only play back movies in “720p.”

The small box, which comes with a remote, will still cost $99. The upgraded version will go on sale next week. The box will continue to offer online movie streaming services that require monthly subscriptions such as Netflix. On Wednesday, Netflix Inc said customers will be able to sign up for its service directly from an Apple TV box and pay for it through an iTunes account.

Movies from Sony Corp and the Walt Disney Co will work on iCloud.

But those from Comcast Corp’s Universal Pictures and News Corp’s 20th Century Fox won’t initially be available because of existing deals with Time Warner Inc’s premium pay TV channel, HBO.

HBO’s policy is to prevent studios from selling movies on iTunes when the movies are playing on its service, which usually begins within a year of their theatrical release. Consumers who buy movies before they start playing on HBO will be allowed to access them through iCloud.

HBO made an exception for sister company Warner Bros. to participate in iCloud in this way, and it will likely do the same for Universal and Fox, said HBO spokesman Jeff Cusson.

“Like with any other technological enhancement, we’ve always been able to find common ground with our studio partners and I’m sure we’ll have the same result here,” Cusson said.

The announcement comes about a week before five Hollywood studios including Sony, Warner Bros. and Fox are to announce that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. will become a partner for an alternative standard of saving movie purchases online called UltraViolet.

Studios are trying boost digital purchases of movies as DVD sales continue to slip. Hollywood believes that digital sales will only increase rapidly if it gives consumers a way to access their purchases on multiple devices easily. For now, Apple’s iCloud and the studios’ UltraViolet will not be compatible with each other.

The movie announcement came at an Apple event where Cook also revealed a new iPad that has higher screen resolution than the previous model and can work on faster 4G cellular networks.

Source:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/news/hardware/Apple-brings-movies-to-iCloud-upgrades-Apple-TV/articleshow/12183483.cms

Designing the Future of Apple TV

January 5th, 2012

The Apple TV is a device with an interesting history. For years now, the tech industry has tried time and time again to re-envision the future of the living room experience. As we’ve talked about in the past, no one has truly tackled the set-top box. Different vendors have simply brought pieces to a puzzle that no one’s been able to solve.

After news broke that the late Steve Jobs felt he had finally solved the puzzle, the rumor mill went into overtime. If you checked out my piece on iOS 5 Notifications, you know I often try to envision what’s next, and the Apple TV is no exception to my enthusiasm for conceptual design. So I spent some time seriously considering what the next Apple TV could and should be. We’ll start with the hardware.

Hardware: Set-Top Box vs. HDTV
A lot of analysts have Apple changing course from their previous Apple TVs in that they’d be selling an actual HDTV as opposed to a set-top box. Apple would undoubtedly make a strong competitor because of the high quality displays they tend to use. Apple’s Cinema Display, for example, is often written off by most people as being an overpriced monitor, when the truth of the matter is that it’s one of the highest quality displays that you can get. That’s why Apple’s displays are even found on the desks of some avid PC users, because they’re users who want or need a display with that type of color accuracy, etc. Point is, a good number of people already have HDTVs, making an Apple HDTV a product that serves to a smaller group. To customers who don’t already have an HDTV, the Apple HDTV might be appealing if they’re willing to spend more on it than they would on a competing set. An Apple would have it’s benefits (which I’ll come back to), but the majority of people will opt for the revamped set-top box instead.

On the outside, the Apple TV looks almost identical to the model that Apple’s shipping today. Inside, the Apple TV features an A5 processor for 1080p playback, and some other spec bumps. As with most Apple products, the focus here is software.

Software
When Apple introduced the iPhone, it wasn’t the introduction of a smartphone that made it so popular, it was the fact that smartphones up until then were comprised of complicated, ugly menus and limited input methods (styluses and fixed buttons). TVs today are the smartphones before the iPhone; they’re functional, but they’re not beautiful, not engaging.

So, how do you make TV software engaging? You take it off the TV. Even people I know that have 20/20 vision and 40+” TVs still seem to find themselves squinting to read ugly, unintuitive menus. It’s an annoying experience, and with more “smart” TVs coming onto the market, buyers now have even more to squint at. These smart TVs seem to have forgotten what the TV is truly about: consuming media. So, if you take the software off the TV, where do you put it? The answer is, you put it right in the user’s hand, you put the software right on the remote.

Apple revolutionized the phone market with their multitouch experience, and so there’s no reason why they shouldn’t bring that same experience to their TV remote as well. Given the remote’s limited hardware requirements, it wouldn’t cost Apple much to build a multitouch remote. Essentially, it’s much like building an iPod Touch without a lot of the hardware that an iPod Touch requires.

Like the TV it controls, the remote runs a modified version of iOS, which makes the user experience extremely familiar to anyone who’s ever used an iPod Touch, iPhone, or iPad. Even the setup experience is similar. Upon first boot, users are asked to pair their remote with the TV, creating a private wireless connection between the TV and the remote. After the remote’s connected, the rest of the iOS-like setup process happens on the remote, asking users if they’d like to enter their iTunes/iCloud/iTunes Home Sharing credentials so that all of their content automatically starts becoming available to the TV or set-top box.

The setup process does this so that all of your content sources are integrated together. For example, the movies app on the remote lets you tab between the movies from your computer, the movies stored in iCloud, the iTunes Store, and even Netflix. By integrating the different content sources, it makes it easy to search for a movie, and check different services all at once. Apple TV also builds a “content quilt” that displays a mosaic of your album art, movie posters, etc, to display up on your TV while the user is picking content. When a user pauses content, it scales down like a window, and hovers over the content quilt. This makes it easy to remember what you were last watching, and even easier to pick right back up where you left off. When you hit play the content simply scales back up to normal size.

However, there is one final service to setup before users are ready to use their Apple TV. That step is choosing a TV provider. Providers spend exorbitant amounts of money on set-top boxes, and broadcasting infrastructure. If Apple played their cards right, they could cut a lot of costs for both TV providers and consumers, all while taking over the living room. Choosing a TV provider works a lot like choosing a cell carrier, you tap it, and select a plan. However, your plan is delivered over your network connection, this saves the carrier from having to provide a set-top box, saves the carrier money when it comes to actually providing the content, provides a lower cost to the end-user, and finally, allows users to easily subscribe to more than one TV provider if they want. TV content has both on demand and on air options just like cable and satellite users have now, but now the TV content comes to users in a way that’s easy to browse, and easier to enjoy. At the core of it, Apple TV gets users back to watching content in a simple and elegant way.

Once set up, users are greeted with a home screen that’s almost identical to the one iOS users have now, except for the fact that the remote features playback controls on the home screen and that the remote features different applications. By default, the user gets apps for Movies, TV Shows, Photos, Music, Netflix, Internet (a folder which houses the apps for YouTube, Vimeo, NHL, MLB, NBA, and WSJ Live), FaceTime (an Apple HDTV only feature), and Settings. A lot of people who have anticipated the revamped Apple TV have made bold claims that the TV will feature a touchscreen or run apps out of the App Store. Ultimately, this only clutters the TV experience and contributes to the problem Apple TV needs to solve. A touchscreen TV would be horrible for end users, asking them to get up and switch apps, not to mention it would result in a fingerprint covered TV. This is why a touch-based remote is a much more natural experience for the users.

As for third-party applications, most applications would only clutter the TV viewing experience. Simple applications like FaceTime make sense for when users aren’t watching TV, but other applications that we’ve seen demoed don’t make sense. If users want those kinds of tools they’ll use their phones, tablets, or computers, not their TVs because people turn on their TVs to unwind and consume content, not do the things they’ve been doing all day on their other devices. In the future, Apple might open up a type of SDK for the Apple TV for content consumption applications like Pandora or iHeartRadio, but as of right now, they need to focus on perfecting the core experience before moving onto that. Just like they perfected the iPhone experience before launching an official App Store for that.

To recap, this remote redefines how people get to their content, it makes for a much more intimate and personal content-choosing experience in a way that users are already familiar with. It also allows users to browse content without interrupting what they’re already viewing.

Siri
Then there’s Siri. Holding the home button on the Apple TV remote triggers Siri in the same way that it does on the iPhone. Overall, Siri acts the same way, but with the Apple TV, Siri gains a partnership with IMDB, meaning users can ask Siri questions like, “who’s that actor?” Siri will check what film’s playing on the TV at the time, and pull up the corresponding cast information.

Benefits of an Apple HDTV
The new Apple TV software makes content viewing easy in a way that really plays to Apple’s strengths, and the Apple TV’s cheap entry cost makes it more accessible than ever. However, for those who haven’t yet upgraded to an HDTV, Apple’s set might be worth considering.

The set features a few advantages, two of which I’ve already mentioned: a higher quality display and FaceTime capabilities. The base of the TV also has a dock for charging the remote when its battery finally dwindles down. (The set-top version of the Apple TV just comes with a basic cord and wall adapter.) When you dock the remote, the TV turns off by default, just like undocking the remote turns it on by default. However, this feature can easily be turned off.

Finally, the Apple HDTV has a feature called SmartConnect. Like any HDTV, Apple’s HDTV would have various inputs for different external devices. However, unlike regular HDTVs, when a device is plugged into the Apple HDTV, it comes up as an icon on the remote’s home screen. The user is then asked if they’d like to name the device. For example, someone might have an Xbox hooked up to their Apple TV, instead of switching inputs, a user simply taps the Xbox “app” from the remote, and just like that the user can see their Xbox. SmartConnect only expands on the idea that users shouldn’t have to jump between different devices connected to their TVs for different kinds of content. The Apple TV is the ultimate hub for entertainment content.

Accessories
Like with any Apple device, there are a few accessories that can be bought for Apple TV devices (both the set-top box and the HDTV). The first is a remote dock. The remote dock is much like Apple’s iPhone dock in that it provides a more elegant charging solution, but with a device like the Apple TV, a dock makes much more sense since users might have their Apple HDTV in the bedroom, and want to turn off their TV by keeping a dock on their nightstand.

The second accessory is the MacBook Air SuperDrive that Apple already offers for their MacBook Air and Mac Mini customers. However, the SuperDrive would come with a microUSB adapter so that it can plug into the port on the back of the set-top box or the standard USB port on the back of the Apple HDTV. This allows users to easily watch DVD content as well as their digital content. (Now if we really started dreaming, Apple would throw in Blu-ray support, but we’ve not heard anything from Apple that revokes their previous “bag of hurt” label that they’ve put on Blu-ray.)

Pricing and Availibility
The Apple HDTV would probably have a starting price around $1099 thanks to its high quality display, which would make it a little more expensive than competing models, but not so expensive that no one would ever buy one.

The Apple TV set-top box, however, comes in two models, the regular $99-129 version that you’d buy in an Apple Store or other retailer like Best Buy or Target. This version can subscribe to any TV provider like I mentioned earlier. However, a secondary provider specific model would be available as well. This means consumers could get an Apple TV set-top box through their TV provider like they do now. This creates a cheaper way for Apple to get the Apple TV into the hands of customers, while carriers still benefit from loaning out more reliable, easier to understand set-top boxes, and the fact that Apple TV streams TV content over a user’s internet connection (which would also be a sales incentive for TV providers that offer broadband services). The only difference for the end-user is that if they get a set-top box through a specific TV provider, that model is provider locked, meaning the Apple TV won’t let users unsubscribe from the carrier they’re renting the set-top box from or subscribe to competing providers.

Overall, that’s my idea of what Apple TV should be. I know there are a lot of people who think it should be more app-focused, but I can’t help but feel that the living room experience should be more dedicated to watching content instead of trying to make it a smartphone-like experience. This experience that I outlined above just seems to be a more natural way of watching content that just feels right, and everyone who’s heard the concept until now seems to agree. If any of you have questions or comments about the concept, feel free to leave them below, and I’ll get back to you.

Source:http://bytenow.net/2012/01/03/designing-the-future-of-apple-tv/

Boxee releasing add-on digital TV tuner

November 17th, 2011

Boxee will release a new add-on device for the Boxee Box in January that allows users to connect antennas to receive free, over-the-air digital television signals, the company said on its blog.

Boxee is free software that aggregates web content into a single portal for users who connect their computers or Boxee hardware to the television set.

The New York company also sells a “Boxee Box,” a stand-alone unit to connect to TVs which mimics the Boxee software but doesn’t require a computer.

The box is available in Canada, the company’s second-largest market outside of the U.S.

Boxee CEO Avner Ronen announced in a blog post on the company’s website last week that it will offer the new device (for $53) so users can also receive free, live TV.

“If you are like us then the way you watch TV has changed. The stuff on Netflix, YouTube, Hulu, Vudu, Vimeo keeps getting better and you can watch it everywhere. You end up watching less traditional TV, but continually pay more for it, which doesn’t make much sense,” Ronen wrote.

“The problem with cancel[l]ing your cable subscription and relying just on the Internet has been the lack of live sports, local news, special events and live TV shows (think Dancing with the Stars). But these things are all available on broadcast TV channels like ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC for free, over the air in HD. With Boxee Live TV you can watch them all on your Boxee Box (and still get all the regular Boxee stuff you love to watch too).”

Ronen added that he continues to meet cord-cutters.

“These are people who have left cable TV behind because it does not fit their lifestyle. They are part of a changing culture, with a changing expectation of how they watch the shows they love,” he wrote.

Source:http://www.thewirereport.ca/reports/content/13217-boxee_releasing_add_on_digital_tv_tuner

5 Ways to Get TV on Your Mobile Device

November 7th, 2011

With the creation of award-winning and compelling content on premium cable networks like HBO, Showtime, AMC, FX, and more, TV is quickly becoming the place to watch truly compelling entertainment that pushes the medium forward. At the same time that TV is getting better, technology is making it easier to access media wherever and whenever we want to. However, being able to access free TV on your mobile devices is still a hassle and virtually impossible.

Although we’re used to being able to sit down and watch TV shows for free on services like Hulu as well as a number of network websites, finding free TV in a mobile environment is a headache. It seems that every mobile TV platform is a paid service. And in this economy, not everyone has the extra money to shell out on monthly cable/satellite service or pay premium fees for specialized services.

But if you’re looking for a way to gain mobile access to your favorite shows, here is a rundown of some of the most popular streaming media options, despite their various costs.

1)Hulu Plus: Although you can watch plenty of TV shows and movies for free through Hulu on your computer, in order to watch it on your mobile device, you’ll have to pay. The Hulu+ app for your smartphone is $7.99/month and gives you access to all the premium content on Hulu+, not just the free stuff.

2) iTunes: There are thousands of movies and TV shows available on iTunes. However iTunes doesn’t have a subscription service, you have to buy (or rent) each episode, season, or movie individually. On the plus side, once you’ve bought and downloaded anything, it is yours to keep forever and you can play it without having to be connected to the internet.

3) Netflix: Netflix also has a huge streaming library of TV and movies, and you can download the app for free when you sign up for the service (starting at about $10/month). It’s a lot like Hulu+, only more focused on movies rather than TV shows.

4) Cable/Satellite providers: Not to be left behind in the digital revolution, many of the top cable and internet providers, like DISH and Comcast (Xfinity), now offer apps for watching premium content through your mobile device when you sign up for service. Pricing will vary according to your package and services, but you can end up paying over $100/month for one of these plans.

5) OrbLive and Slingbox: Others apps like OrbLive and Slingbox let you remotely access music, movies, and TV shows you have stored on your home computer. However, not only do you have to buy the app and the hardware ($100-$350), then you have to do all your own setup and may have to buy even more hardware in order to watch live TV. So, unless you’re very tech-savvy to begin with, this is probably not a good option.

Besides these options, you can download apps from ABC and CBS that offer you free access to their shows, but unless you’re a really big fan of CSI or The Bachelorette, this is very limiting.

In the end, if you want access to a wide variety of streaming content on your mobile device, you’ll need to pay. In order to decide which option is best for you, you’ll have to decide what kind of content you want access to and how much you are willing to pay. For those that want current TV episodes from the major networks, Hulu+ might be best. But if you want immediate access to a spate of HBO shows, maybe it’s better to go through your cable/satellite provider. Or if what you really want is movies, go for Netflix.

Source:http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/5-ways-tv-mobile-device/

Google presents updated version of its TV service

October 29th, 2011

Google presents updated TV service

Internet search engine owner Google introduced a redesigned television service after sales of its initial version didn’t meet some expectations.

The software, which displays Web content on TV screens, has a simpler interface to encourage users to try more of the service’s features, said Mario Queiroz, vice president of product management. The new version, which also is designed to show the YouTube video-sharing service better, opens up the platform for Android developers to build applications for TV.

“This is one of the early miles of the marathon,” Queiroz said. “We’re running hard, and this is another important step in bringing this functionality to TV.”

Google, pushing into areas that boost competition with such rivals as Apple and Microsoft, unveiled the TV service last year with partners including Sony and Dish Network. Logitech, another initial hardware partner, cut the price of its set-top box for Google TV earlier this year to attract buyers.

The new version helps users “discover” programming more easily as they browse rather than searching for it by typing keywords into a box, said Van Baker, an analyst with Gartner in San Jose.

Google TV’s software upgrade will be rolling out to Sony devices early next week and to Logitech soon after that.

REAL ESTATE

Defendants identified in auction-bid rigging

The names of the eight Northern California real estate investors who agreed to plead guilty to allegations they rigged bids at public foreclosure auctions have been released.

They are: Gary Anderson of Saratoga; James Doherty of Hillsborough; Troy Kent of San Mateo; Henry Pessah of Burlingame; and Patrick Campion, Keith Goodman, Craig Lipton and Laith Salma, all of San Francisco.

The investors conspired not to bid against one another at auctions in San Francisco County and San Mateo County, the U.S. Justice Department said Thursday.

To date, 18 people have agreed to plead guilty in the Justice Department’s ongoing investigation of bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California, according to the statement.

COMPUTERS

HP credit ratings put on review

Hewlett-Packard Co. had its credit ratings placed on review for possible downgrade by Moody’s Investors Service after the company decided to keep its personal computer business.

Moody’s, which rates Hewlett-Packard’s long-term debt A2, said it will focus on the implications for the capital structure and liquidity profile of plans under new Chief Executive Officer Meg Whitman. The review affects about $24 billion of debt.

“HP maintains a solid liquidity profile,” although the company used almost $6 billion of its $13 billion in cash as of July to fund the $10.3 billion acquisition of software company Autonomy Corp., Moody’s said Friday in a statement. The ratings service is also looking at how much it will cost to reinvigorate HP’s technology-services unit.

Source:http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/28/BUGL1LLNC6.DTL&type=tech

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes