Posts Tagged ‘TV’

Designing the Future of Apple TV

January 5th, 2012

The Apple TV is a device with an interesting history. For years now, the tech industry has tried time and time again to re-envision the future of the living room experience. As we’ve talked about in the past, no one has truly tackled the set-top box. Different vendors have simply brought pieces to a puzzle that no one’s been able to solve.

After news broke that the late Steve Jobs felt he had finally solved the puzzle, the rumor mill went into overtime. If you checked out my piece on iOS 5 Notifications, you know I often try to envision what’s next, and the Apple TV is no exception to my enthusiasm for conceptual design. So I spent some time seriously considering what the next Apple TV could and should be. We’ll start with the hardware.

Hardware: Set-Top Box vs. HDTV
A lot of analysts have Apple changing course from their previous Apple TVs in that they’d be selling an actual HDTV as opposed to a set-top box. Apple would undoubtedly make a strong competitor because of the high quality displays they tend to use. Apple’s Cinema Display, for example, is often written off by most people as being an overpriced monitor, when the truth of the matter is that it’s one of the highest quality displays that you can get. That’s why Apple’s displays are even found on the desks of some avid PC users, because they’re users who want or need a display with that type of color accuracy, etc. Point is, a good number of people already have HDTVs, making an Apple HDTV a product that serves to a smaller group. To customers who don’t already have an HDTV, the Apple HDTV might be appealing if they’re willing to spend more on it than they would on a competing set. An Apple would have it’s benefits (which I’ll come back to), but the majority of people will opt for the revamped set-top box instead.

On the outside, the Apple TV looks almost identical to the model that Apple’s shipping today. Inside, the Apple TV features an A5 processor for 1080p playback, and some other spec bumps. As with most Apple products, the focus here is software.

Software
When Apple introduced the iPhone, it wasn’t the introduction of a smartphone that made it so popular, it was the fact that smartphones up until then were comprised of complicated, ugly menus and limited input methods (styluses and fixed buttons). TVs today are the smartphones before the iPhone; they’re functional, but they’re not beautiful, not engaging.

So, how do you make TV software engaging? You take it off the TV. Even people I know that have 20/20 vision and 40+” TVs still seem to find themselves squinting to read ugly, unintuitive menus. It’s an annoying experience, and with more “smart” TVs coming onto the market, buyers now have even more to squint at. These smart TVs seem to have forgotten what the TV is truly about: consuming media. So, if you take the software off the TV, where do you put it? The answer is, you put it right in the user’s hand, you put the software right on the remote.

Apple revolutionized the phone market with their multitouch experience, and so there’s no reason why they shouldn’t bring that same experience to their TV remote as well. Given the remote’s limited hardware requirements, it wouldn’t cost Apple much to build a multitouch remote. Essentially, it’s much like building an iPod Touch without a lot of the hardware that an iPod Touch requires.

Like the TV it controls, the remote runs a modified version of iOS, which makes the user experience extremely familiar to anyone who’s ever used an iPod Touch, iPhone, or iPad. Even the setup experience is similar. Upon first boot, users are asked to pair their remote with the TV, creating a private wireless connection between the TV and the remote. After the remote’s connected, the rest of the iOS-like setup process happens on the remote, asking users if they’d like to enter their iTunes/iCloud/iTunes Home Sharing credentials so that all of their content automatically starts becoming available to the TV or set-top box.

The setup process does this so that all of your content sources are integrated together. For example, the movies app on the remote lets you tab between the movies from your computer, the movies stored in iCloud, the iTunes Store, and even Netflix. By integrating the different content sources, it makes it easy to search for a movie, and check different services all at once. Apple TV also builds a “content quilt” that displays a mosaic of your album art, movie posters, etc, to display up on your TV while the user is picking content. When a user pauses content, it scales down like a window, and hovers over the content quilt. This makes it easy to remember what you were last watching, and even easier to pick right back up where you left off. When you hit play the content simply scales back up to normal size.

However, there is one final service to setup before users are ready to use their Apple TV. That step is choosing a TV provider. Providers spend exorbitant amounts of money on set-top boxes, and broadcasting infrastructure. If Apple played their cards right, they could cut a lot of costs for both TV providers and consumers, all while taking over the living room. Choosing a TV provider works a lot like choosing a cell carrier, you tap it, and select a plan. However, your plan is delivered over your network connection, this saves the carrier from having to provide a set-top box, saves the carrier money when it comes to actually providing the content, provides a lower cost to the end-user, and finally, allows users to easily subscribe to more than one TV provider if they want. TV content has both on demand and on air options just like cable and satellite users have now, but now the TV content comes to users in a way that’s easy to browse, and easier to enjoy. At the core of it, Apple TV gets users back to watching content in a simple and elegant way.

Once set up, users are greeted with a home screen that’s almost identical to the one iOS users have now, except for the fact that the remote features playback controls on the home screen and that the remote features different applications. By default, the user gets apps for Movies, TV Shows, Photos, Music, Netflix, Internet (a folder which houses the apps for YouTube, Vimeo, NHL, MLB, NBA, and WSJ Live), FaceTime (an Apple HDTV only feature), and Settings. A lot of people who have anticipated the revamped Apple TV have made bold claims that the TV will feature a touchscreen or run apps out of the App Store. Ultimately, this only clutters the TV experience and contributes to the problem Apple TV needs to solve. A touchscreen TV would be horrible for end users, asking them to get up and switch apps, not to mention it would result in a fingerprint covered TV. This is why a touch-based remote is a much more natural experience for the users.

As for third-party applications, most applications would only clutter the TV viewing experience. Simple applications like FaceTime make sense for when users aren’t watching TV, but other applications that we’ve seen demoed don’t make sense. If users want those kinds of tools they’ll use their phones, tablets, or computers, not their TVs because people turn on their TVs to unwind and consume content, not do the things they’ve been doing all day on their other devices. In the future, Apple might open up a type of SDK for the Apple TV for content consumption applications like Pandora or iHeartRadio, but as of right now, they need to focus on perfecting the core experience before moving onto that. Just like they perfected the iPhone experience before launching an official App Store for that.

To recap, this remote redefines how people get to their content, it makes for a much more intimate and personal content-choosing experience in a way that users are already familiar with. It also allows users to browse content without interrupting what they’re already viewing.

Siri
Then there’s Siri. Holding the home button on the Apple TV remote triggers Siri in the same way that it does on the iPhone. Overall, Siri acts the same way, but with the Apple TV, Siri gains a partnership with IMDB, meaning users can ask Siri questions like, “who’s that actor?” Siri will check what film’s playing on the TV at the time, and pull up the corresponding cast information.

Benefits of an Apple HDTV
The new Apple TV software makes content viewing easy in a way that really plays to Apple’s strengths, and the Apple TV’s cheap entry cost makes it more accessible than ever. However, for those who haven’t yet upgraded to an HDTV, Apple’s set might be worth considering.

The set features a few advantages, two of which I’ve already mentioned: a higher quality display and FaceTime capabilities. The base of the TV also has a dock for charging the remote when its battery finally dwindles down. (The set-top version of the Apple TV just comes with a basic cord and wall adapter.) When you dock the remote, the TV turns off by default, just like undocking the remote turns it on by default. However, this feature can easily be turned off.

Finally, the Apple HDTV has a feature called SmartConnect. Like any HDTV, Apple’s HDTV would have various inputs for different external devices. However, unlike regular HDTVs, when a device is plugged into the Apple HDTV, it comes up as an icon on the remote’s home screen. The user is then asked if they’d like to name the device. For example, someone might have an Xbox hooked up to their Apple TV, instead of switching inputs, a user simply taps the Xbox “app” from the remote, and just like that the user can see their Xbox. SmartConnect only expands on the idea that users shouldn’t have to jump between different devices connected to their TVs for different kinds of content. The Apple TV is the ultimate hub for entertainment content.

Accessories
Like with any Apple device, there are a few accessories that can be bought for Apple TV devices (both the set-top box and the HDTV). The first is a remote dock. The remote dock is much like Apple’s iPhone dock in that it provides a more elegant charging solution, but with a device like the Apple TV, a dock makes much more sense since users might have their Apple HDTV in the bedroom, and want to turn off their TV by keeping a dock on their nightstand.

The second accessory is the MacBook Air SuperDrive that Apple already offers for their MacBook Air and Mac Mini customers. However, the SuperDrive would come with a microUSB adapter so that it can plug into the port on the back of the set-top box or the standard USB port on the back of the Apple HDTV. This allows users to easily watch DVD content as well as their digital content. (Now if we really started dreaming, Apple would throw in Blu-ray support, but we’ve not heard anything from Apple that revokes their previous “bag of hurt” label that they’ve put on Blu-ray.)

Pricing and Availibility
The Apple HDTV would probably have a starting price around $1099 thanks to its high quality display, which would make it a little more expensive than competing models, but not so expensive that no one would ever buy one.

The Apple TV set-top box, however, comes in two models, the regular $99-129 version that you’d buy in an Apple Store or other retailer like Best Buy or Target. This version can subscribe to any TV provider like I mentioned earlier. However, a secondary provider specific model would be available as well. This means consumers could get an Apple TV set-top box through their TV provider like they do now. This creates a cheaper way for Apple to get the Apple TV into the hands of customers, while carriers still benefit from loaning out more reliable, easier to understand set-top boxes, and the fact that Apple TV streams TV content over a user’s internet connection (which would also be a sales incentive for TV providers that offer broadband services). The only difference for the end-user is that if they get a set-top box through a specific TV provider, that model is provider locked, meaning the Apple TV won’t let users unsubscribe from the carrier they’re renting the set-top box from or subscribe to competing providers.

Overall, that’s my idea of what Apple TV should be. I know there are a lot of people who think it should be more app-focused, but I can’t help but feel that the living room experience should be more dedicated to watching content instead of trying to make it a smartphone-like experience. This experience that I outlined above just seems to be a more natural way of watching content that just feels right, and everyone who’s heard the concept until now seems to agree. If any of you have questions or comments about the concept, feel free to leave them below, and I’ll get back to you.

Source:http://bytenow.net/2012/01/03/designing-the-future-of-apple-tv/

Boxee releasing add-on digital TV tuner

November 17th, 2011

Boxee will release a new add-on device for the Boxee Box in January that allows users to connect antennas to receive free, over-the-air digital television signals, the company said on its blog.

Boxee is free software that aggregates web content into a single portal for users who connect their computers or Boxee hardware to the television set.

The New York company also sells a “Boxee Box,” a stand-alone unit to connect to TVs which mimics the Boxee software but doesn’t require a computer.

The box is available in Canada, the company’s second-largest market outside of the U.S.

Boxee CEO Avner Ronen announced in a blog post on the company’s website last week that it will offer the new device (for $53) so users can also receive free, live TV.

“If you are like us then the way you watch TV has changed. The stuff on Netflix, YouTube, Hulu, Vudu, Vimeo keeps getting better and you can watch it everywhere. You end up watching less traditional TV, but continually pay more for it, which doesn’t make much sense,” Ronen wrote.

“The problem with cancel[l]ing your cable subscription and relying just on the Internet has been the lack of live sports, local news, special events and live TV shows (think Dancing with the Stars). But these things are all available on broadcast TV channels like ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC for free, over the air in HD. With Boxee Live TV you can watch them all on your Boxee Box (and still get all the regular Boxee stuff you love to watch too).”

Ronen added that he continues to meet cord-cutters.

“These are people who have left cable TV behind because it does not fit their lifestyle. They are part of a changing culture, with a changing expectation of how they watch the shows they love,” he wrote.

Source:http://www.thewirereport.ca/reports/content/13217-boxee_releasing_add_on_digital_tv_tuner

5 Ways to Get TV on Your Mobile Device

November 7th, 2011

With the creation of award-winning and compelling content on premium cable networks like HBO, Showtime, AMC, FX, and more, TV is quickly becoming the place to watch truly compelling entertainment that pushes the medium forward. At the same time that TV is getting better, technology is making it easier to access media wherever and whenever we want to. However, being able to access free TV on your mobile devices is still a hassle and virtually impossible.

Although we’re used to being able to sit down and watch TV shows for free on services like Hulu as well as a number of network websites, finding free TV in a mobile environment is a headache. It seems that every mobile TV platform is a paid service. And in this economy, not everyone has the extra money to shell out on monthly cable/satellite service or pay premium fees for specialized services.

But if you’re looking for a way to gain mobile access to your favorite shows, here is a rundown of some of the most popular streaming media options, despite their various costs.

1)Hulu Plus: Although you can watch plenty of TV shows and movies for free through Hulu on your computer, in order to watch it on your mobile device, you’ll have to pay. The Hulu+ app for your smartphone is $7.99/month and gives you access to all the premium content on Hulu+, not just the free stuff.

2) iTunes: There are thousands of movies and TV shows available on iTunes. However iTunes doesn’t have a subscription service, you have to buy (or rent) each episode, season, or movie individually. On the plus side, once you’ve bought and downloaded anything, it is yours to keep forever and you can play it without having to be connected to the internet.

3) Netflix: Netflix also has a huge streaming library of TV and movies, and you can download the app for free when you sign up for the service (starting at about $10/month). It’s a lot like Hulu+, only more focused on movies rather than TV shows.

4) Cable/Satellite providers: Not to be left behind in the digital revolution, many of the top cable and internet providers, like DISH and Comcast (Xfinity), now offer apps for watching premium content through your mobile device when you sign up for service. Pricing will vary according to your package and services, but you can end up paying over $100/month for one of these plans.

5) OrbLive and Slingbox: Others apps like OrbLive and Slingbox let you remotely access music, movies, and TV shows you have stored on your home computer. However, not only do you have to buy the app and the hardware ($100-$350), then you have to do all your own setup and may have to buy even more hardware in order to watch live TV. So, unless you’re very tech-savvy to begin with, this is probably not a good option.

Besides these options, you can download apps from ABC and CBS that offer you free access to their shows, but unless you’re a really big fan of CSI or The Bachelorette, this is very limiting.

In the end, if you want access to a wide variety of streaming content on your mobile device, you’ll need to pay. In order to decide which option is best for you, you’ll have to decide what kind of content you want access to and how much you are willing to pay. For those that want current TV episodes from the major networks, Hulu+ might be best. But if you want immediate access to a spate of HBO shows, maybe it’s better to go through your cable/satellite provider. Or if what you really want is movies, go for Netflix.

Source:http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/5-ways-tv-mobile-device/

Google presents updated version of its TV service

October 29th, 2011

Google presents updated TV service

Internet search engine owner Google introduced a redesigned television service after sales of its initial version didn’t meet some expectations.

The software, which displays Web content on TV screens, has a simpler interface to encourage users to try more of the service’s features, said Mario Queiroz, vice president of product management. The new version, which also is designed to show the YouTube video-sharing service better, opens up the platform for Android developers to build applications for TV.

“This is one of the early miles of the marathon,” Queiroz said. “We’re running hard, and this is another important step in bringing this functionality to TV.”

Google, pushing into areas that boost competition with such rivals as Apple and Microsoft, unveiled the TV service last year with partners including Sony and Dish Network. Logitech, another initial hardware partner, cut the price of its set-top box for Google TV earlier this year to attract buyers.

The new version helps users “discover” programming more easily as they browse rather than searching for it by typing keywords into a box, said Van Baker, an analyst with Gartner in San Jose.

Google TV’s software upgrade will be rolling out to Sony devices early next week and to Logitech soon after that.

REAL ESTATE

Defendants identified in auction-bid rigging

The names of the eight Northern California real estate investors who agreed to plead guilty to allegations they rigged bids at public foreclosure auctions have been released.

They are: Gary Anderson of Saratoga; James Doherty of Hillsborough; Troy Kent of San Mateo; Henry Pessah of Burlingame; and Patrick Campion, Keith Goodman, Craig Lipton and Laith Salma, all of San Francisco.

The investors conspired not to bid against one another at auctions in San Francisco County and San Mateo County, the U.S. Justice Department said Thursday.

To date, 18 people have agreed to plead guilty in the Justice Department’s ongoing investigation of bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California, according to the statement.

COMPUTERS

HP credit ratings put on review

Hewlett-Packard Co. had its credit ratings placed on review for possible downgrade by Moody’s Investors Service after the company decided to keep its personal computer business.

Moody’s, which rates Hewlett-Packard’s long-term debt A2, said it will focus on the implications for the capital structure and liquidity profile of plans under new Chief Executive Officer Meg Whitman. The review affects about $24 billion of debt.

“HP maintains a solid liquidity profile,” although the company used almost $6 billion of its $13 billion in cash as of July to fund the $10.3 billion acquisition of software company Autonomy Corp., Moody’s said Friday in a statement. The ratings service is also looking at how much it will cost to reinvigorate HP’s technology-services unit.

Source:http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/28/BUGL1LLNC6.DTL&type=tech

Connected TV watched in 42m homes

October 19th, 2011

Across the US and Europe, 42m homes are already accessing internet services through their TVs, market watcher Strategy Analytics reckons.

Given the rise of Netflix, Hulu and other such services, it’s no surprise to learn that the Americans are leading the move from broadcast television to IPTV.

SA spoke to 4800 punters over there and over here. Some 20 per cent of the US survey participants said they have watched internet content on their TV screens in the past month, but only ten per cent of Europeans had.

Ironically, the UK leads the way in internet-streamed catch-up content, thanks to BBC iPlayer. SA’s numbers suggest that while more TVs and set-top boxes are gaining iPlayer support, most of the service’s uses still watch it on a computer.

Speaking of hardware, US consumers tend to get internet content on theit tellies through their games consoles. Europeans prefer to connect up PCs, SA’s survey found.

Streaming content over a home network and internet-connected Blu-ray disc players are also significant in both territories, it added.

The usage of TVs that can connect directly to the internet over a home wireless network or a wired link was not mentioned, suggesting it’s still a minority interest. No great surprise, that – connected TVs are relatively new, and many folk have yet to feel the need to upgrade their current flat-panels.

Source:http://www.reghardware.com/2011/10/18/42m_us_and_european_homes_watch_internet_streamed_content_on_their_tv/

Will Apple launch a TV set?

September 6th, 2011

Not another Apple TV black box but a real 50″ flat-screen TV, “Designed by Apple in California” – and made in China, like most Apple products. Or made In Korea, if the company concludes a new pact with its best “frenemy”, Samsung, the new king of TV sets, the new Sony.

Rumours of an Apple TV set have been circulating for at least two years. In a May 2010 blogpost, Peter Yared wrote:
“Stylish, high-end TVs is the last consumer electronics frontier for Apple to dominate, and it will make apps as much of a differentiator on TVs as they were on smartphones.”

and:
“The TV is the last frontier in Silicon Valley’s relentless drive to computerise every screen. With the price of fully internet-enabling a screen at below $300, everything that people see and touch is being turned into a computer: mobile phones, billboards, price displays, and with the iPad even magazines, books, and newspapers.”

More recently, Gene Munster, an oft-quoted analyst at the PiperJaffray investment bank, repeated his prediction of an Apple TV set launch in 2012, with Stewart Alsop adding:
“Apple will do to television manufacturers what it did to phone makers with the iPhone …”

The idea is exciting and so obvious it’s got to happen. Imagine a true plug-and-play experience. One set with only two wires: power and the cable TV coax. Turn it on, assert your Apple ID credentials and you’re in business. The programme guide looks good and is easy to navigate; pay channels are just a click and a password away. The TV runs apps, from games to FaceTime and Skype, it “just works” with your other iDevices and also acts as a Wi-Fi base station using the cable provider’s internet service.

But when we turn to the small matter Of implementation, we see a few obstacles.

First, the TV incorporates a set-top box, with storage for the DVR function. It’s feasible: the CableCARD was invented for that very use. The electronics of a set-top box:

Now squeezed onto a card that’s inserted in the back of the TV set:

It’s an attractive idea, but the implementation failed to meet expectations. Although critics accuse cable carriers of being technically incompetent and lazy, I think there’s a more acceptable explanation: Carriers looked at the CableCARD and saw complicated field service calls in their future. A separate, outboard set-top box is easy to diagnose and fix; a card inside the TV set, not so much. It generates a host of hard-to-understand bugs: Is the card working? Is it kind of working but causing the TV to malfunction? Is the TV working but killing the card?… and so on. More calls, more finger pointing, more expensive field techs…

Apple’s product culture, its talent for giving birth to nicely integrated devices could overcome some of these problems, but not the field tech issue. Would this new product force Apple to deploy its own Geek Squad, or do we see ourselves carrying a 50″ Apple TV set back to the store when something goes wrong?

Then there’s the complexity of supporting multiple cable systems. Large carriers, such as Comcast, are known as multiple system operators, MSOs. They’re a patchwork of acquired systems that have never needed to be compatible. This would either restrict the TV set to a small number of carriers, or make the product more complicated and prone to more bugs – and more field tech visits.

And there’s Moore’s Law. In addition to the CableCard, the wonder set contains a little computer running iOS, and enough storage for apps and content that’s not hosted by iCloud. Great …but how long will it last? Not in terms of reliability, that’s not a problem — especially with an SSD replacing the DVR’s conventional hard disk – but in terms of being competitive with newer hardware.

Conventional TVs aren’t really affected by Moore’s Law. As long as the electronics work and the display doesn’t fail – and today’s sets are exceptionally reliable – there’s little pressure to upgrade. Once a family shells out for a nice 1080p set, it’s difficult to sell them the new improved model next year.

We’re willing to upgrade our laptops, smartphones and tablets every year or two because Moore’s Law keeps improving the CPU and other electronics at the rapid rate that made the computer industry’s fortunes. An integrated Apple TV set wouldn’t benefit from better electronics as naturally as an iPhone does … unless, of course, the tiny iOS computer is implemented as an easily accessible plug-in module. This could also solve – or at least mitigate – the field service problem: Bring the module to the store, we’ll diagnose and replace it if needed … or sell you this year’s model.

In one device we might have something like: a CableCard inside an Apple TV 3.0, itself inside a TV set.

With regard to carriers, there’s no need to disintermediate them, no need for Apple to seduce them into giving up content sales the way Jobs did with AT&T. Carriers ought to welcome an Apple TV set as a way to increase their ARPU, but for this to happen much work remains. Try getting a human on the phone when you want to add a channel to your current Comcast bundle. At home, you’re connected through a secure device with a known MAC address, so why can’t you simply point to a channel and click-to-add? This and other bone-headed commercial practices – such as refusing to suspend your billing when you’re between houses – reveals a depth of customer-hostile culture that an Apple or a Google would find intolerable, but might have trouble changing.

I mention Google because they’re in the TV/internet/apps integration game as well. The first Google TV wasn’t a success, to say the least. My friends at Logitech lost tens of millions of dollars – and a CEO – with the first iteration. And Sony’s Google TV implementation didn’t fly either.

But the concept remains valid. And now that Google owns Motorola, a company with known expertise in set-top boxes and CableCards, we can expect a next-generation Google TV and, quite likely, a Samsung TV set with an integrated Google TV running Android apps and competing with the putative Apple TV.

I used to think product size, carriers and the rapid obsolescence of the integrated computer made an Apple TV set an impossible dream. I’m not so sure any more.

JLG@mondaynote.com

PS: To help think about this some more, a great counter-example: the Bose Videowave TV set. I use and like other Bose products but, with this one, what are thinking? $5,000, no cable box integration, a separate console box for the “integrated” set. See the setup and owner’s guides for more details.

Source:http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2011/sep/05/apple-television

Where Is Internet TV Heading In 2011?

January 1st, 2011

2010 has been a big year, in fact the biggest yet for internet tv. Amongst all the launches, new developments and other shenanigans, the year has ended with some winners and some losers. Many that have had major blips would never have been predicted in a million years, yes i am talking about you Google TV. On the flip side, some companies getting a stronger foothold were surprising too, for example the Roku set-top box.

So to see where we are heading in 2011, we need a recap of 2010. The year was dominated by hardware that let viewers access online content on the big screen tv. The reasoning being that most viewers do not want complicated computers and loading software to watch tv, they want to press a button on the remote and watch tv shows and movies on demand.

One of the biggest players in internet tv hardware were led by Steve Jobs with the revamped Apple TV product. With a low $99 pricepoint and access to the massive iTunes library guaranteeing it’s success. The downside is of course that users are stuck with iTunes and the closed architecture means no other companies can get in unless approved by Apple. This domination puts many people off, but also would endear Apple to content providers.

Internet connected television Most big name tv manufacturers launched television sets that were internet connected from the box. Allowing viewers to access web content on the big screen tv. Services such as Youtube, Netflix and social networking were on offer from Sony, Samsung amongst others.

Other set top box creators are booming with hardware that basically adds Netflix, Amazon and other services straight to the tv set. Roku, have seen a doubling of sales this year, and D-link with their Boxee, launched a revamped product that was cheaper than Google TV and available Internationally.

Clampdown on online Piracy

Many websites were shut down in 2010 in a rash of takedowns by the Government. Many sites that are re-broadcasting content are in the middle of legal battles with the tv networks. Amongst them are FilmOn, Ivi TV and TVCatchup. All these companies are pleading innocence, but will they be able to win a battle with the tv companies?

Tablet Computers and Mobile Devices

Tablets really took off in 2010. dominated by Apple’s iPad. Many copycat tablets are being released including probably best of the bunch, the Samsung Tab which is a real rival to iPad running off the Android OS. It has been commented by many that the iPad was built for watching TV and it’s owners more likely to cut the cord.

TV On Demand

Netflix has had a great year, wrapping up new content deals on a regular basis, Hulu has had a tougher time and been criticised for their subscription service. But they are now making money and have a great online platform.

Losers in 2010

Google promised to seamlessly marry the tv with a web browser, but a high price point and negative reviews were followed by the TV networks blocking online tv streaming to the Google enabled TV set. It has got to the point where Google are asking manufacturers to hold off releasing Google TV hardware until it updates the software.

Yahoo were one of the earliest adopters of the internet tv concept but seemed to lose their way with the Yahoo! widget concept. The idea of tv sets running Yahoo software has been superceeded by the apps setup on most connected tv’s. Howeverhere are over 70 models that support it from makers such as Samsung, Sony, LG, Vizio and Toshiba. They recently agreed a deal with Europes largest TV manufacturer Vestel, to distribute Yahoo powered tv sets into Europe.

Meanwhile, Netflix has been gathering up its own hoard of TV content to continue and expand its offering. It’s run into some roadblocks from certain Hollywood studios, but is still seeing more success than stumbling.

Internet TV the future

Online tv streaming is firmly established and will continue to grow, albeit behind paywalls and possibly hardware restricted (If Apple gets their way). Apple TV will continue to grow its user base, already this year they managed to shift one million Apple TV boxes.

Viewers time will increasingly be taken up by online activities. Netflix and Hulu will continue to ‘slug it out’ and one will end up on top.

Google will get their Google TV act together and with updated software will probably tie up deals with tv networks allowing for pay tv streaming on the system. They will also roll out the hardware on the International stage. There will also be lots more Android powered devices all capable of streaming tv and movies.

The TV Networks will finally sort out an online strategy. Currently blocking any streaming to the big screen, they will

Expect to see lots more tv on lots more devices, and expect to see shows when you want. Expect to discuss what your watching with friends and the worldwide community via social networking. Expect to be able to call up any details about the show or movie your watching in a seamless experience of tv watching and web browsing. Expect internet and the tv to finally merge as one in 2011.

Source:-http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/internet-tv-heading-2011/

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes