Posts Tagged ‘Mobile’

Does Facebook have a mobile problem?

February 3rd, 2012

For the social networking giant Facebook, mobile phones represent both an opportunity and significant risk to the company’s business.

Over the past year, Facebook executives have noted the growing importance of mobile for the company’s growth. About a year ago, the company launched an initiative to get its mobile app on all mobile devices, including smartphones, feature phones, and even the Apple iPad. And Facebook usage on mobile devices has skyrocketed.
But in documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday for the company’s upcoming initial public offering, Facebook admits that the shift toward mobile is also significant risk to its bottom line.

There’s no doubt that mobile is Facebook’s future. In December 2011, Facebook said that more than 425 million monthly active users accessed Facebook on a mobile device. This is roughly half of all of Facebook’s monthly active users. And the company expects this figure to grow, eventually eclipsing the number of users who access the company’s site solely via a computer. But Facebook is worried that this trend could harm its business, unless it can figure out how to monetize this growing user base.
“Although the substantial majority of our mobile users also access and engage with Facebook on personal computers where we display advertising, our users could decide to increasingly access our products primarily through mobile devices. We do not currently directly generate any meaningful revenue from the use of Facebook mobile products, and our ability to do so successfully is unproven.”
For Facebook finding a way to make money from all these users accessing its site from mobile phones and tablets is one of its top priorities. And as of yet, the company has not disclosed how it will do it.
There has been talk that the company will try to include advertising in the Facebook mobile app in a similar way to how it displays ads on its Web site. For example, its Facebook Sponsored Stories ads, which show how friends are interacting with brands, could appear in the Facebook news feed on mobile devices, too.
So far Facebook has kept mum about how it will develop the mobile app market. But the company already faces stiff competition here, as companies, such as Google and Apple, already have a significant leg-up in mobile advertising. But Facebook may have an untapped advantage over the competition, given that its users share so much valuable information with Facebook.

People on Facebook readily reveal their likes and dislikes, activities, where they live, sexual orientation, where they work, and where they’ve gone to school. Advertisers are hungry for this information, which they can use to tailor more targeted and meaningful advertisements to individuals.
If Facebook can leverage this opportunity, it could be a boon for the company. But the risks are high. Mobile devices are more personal and advertising via this medium needs to be done thoughtfully.
There are other risks as well that Facebook points out in its filing associated with the move to mobile. For one, the company doesn’t own the software or hardware platforms on which its service operates. It also doesn’t control wireless carriers, which can block or water down certain apps, such as Facebook, on phones that operate on their networks.
“Facebook user growth and engagement on mobile devices depend upon effective operation with mobile operating systems, networks, and standards that we do not control,” the company states.

The company specifically calls out Google and its popular Android operating system as a major threat.
“We are dependent on the interoperability of Facebook with popular mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as Android and iOS, and any changes in such systems that degrade our products’ functionality or give preferential treatment to competitive products could adversely affect Facebook usage on mobile devices,” the company says in the filing.
Indeed, Google’s Android is the fastest growing mobile OS in the world. And it’s already the No. 2 operating system in terms of installed smartphone users, as of the fourth quarter 2011, according to ComScore. Android devices made up nearly 30 percent of all smartphones in the U.S. market at the end of the fourth quarter.
The big risk for Facebook is that Google starts including its Google+ social networking service into Android devices. Google has already done this with Gmail, Google Maps and Navigation, Google Search and several other Google products that are tightly woven into the Android OS. And it could easily bake Google+ into every new Android device, leaving consumers with less of a reason to launch their mobile Facebook apps.

“If you think Google won’t integrate Google+ into Android, you’re kidding yourself,” said Scott Kveton, CEO of Urban Airship, which offers a platform on which developers can create mobile apps. “Of course, they will. And that’s a big deal, because if all you have to do is sign into Gmail and you’re connected to your social network, then why open the Facebook app?”
It’s not just Google that will exert pressure on Facebook in the mobile market, but other social-networking companies targeting mobile could also threaten Facebook. The company also notes Twitter and Microsoft as competitors in its S1 filing. And it calls out a slew of unnamed “mobile companies and smaller Internet companies that offer products and services that may compete with specific Facebook features.” These may include mobile-specific social networking apps, such as FourSquare, Path, and Instagram.
Indeed, some of these competitors are offering subscribers a better user experience on mobile devices than Facebook has been able to create. Venture capitalist and principal of Union Square Ventures Fred Wilson noted during a recent talk at Columbia Journalism School in New York City that in spite of the large percentage of Facebook users moving to mobile, usage of other social-networking apps is also still growing rapidly. And in some cases, he said that users may be more engaged with alternative social networking apps on their phones that are specific to the mobile platform.
“Facebook has mobile versions of its sites,” he said. “But it’s a crunched down experience.”
Urban Airship’s Kveton agrees. “If you think about Facebook trying to cram its entire feature set onto a phone, it’s tricky,” he said.
Still, he said, that the opportunity for Facebook on mobile is immense, even with more competition from other social-networking apps.
“Processing power on devices will get faster, networks will improve, screens will get sharper, and location services will get more accurate,” he said. “So there is still a huge opportunity for social app developers to carve out a niche in mobile, and Facebook is included in that.”
The question now is whether Facebook will be able to turn all those eyeballs gazing at its mobile app on cell phones and tablets into a revenue stream.

Source:http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-57370105-266/does-facebook-have-a-mobile-problem/

Wasp Barcode Technologies Launches New Barcode Scanner and Mobile Computer

January 31st, 2012

Wasp Barcode Technologies, a leading provider of small business productivity solutions, today announced the launch of the WWS450 2D barcode scanner with base and the DT10 mobile computer. Designed specifically for small business owners, both products offer ease of use with fast and accurate data collecting features.

Wasp’s WWS450 2D barcode scanner series with base accurately reads 1D and 2D barcodes with its digital imager scan engine. By plugging the USB adapter into a PC, the scanner can read barcodes up to 160 feet away from the base by using wireless connectivity. Outside of the 160-foot wireless range, the scanner can hold up to 160 barcode scans in the buffer memory. Barcode data is instantly added to a spreadsheet, document or database, without time-consuming manual data entries or inaccuracies. The WWS450 is ideal for retailers, post offices, banks and utility companies.

Wasp’s DT10 mobile computer series provides fast and accurate data collection for inventory accountability, communication tasks and activity training. The lightweight, pocket sized mobile computer is built to withstand multiple 4 foot drops to concrete, and with an IP54 rating, it is ideal for dirty environments and occasional exposure to liquids. The DT10 series offers three hardware options to meet specific application needs. Depending on the hardware, the DT10 can accurately scan 1D barcodes, allow for real-time transactions for applications on-the-go and allow for enhanced communication with employees and customers.

“Wasp Barcode Technologies is dedicated to delivering products that increase efficiency within the small business world,” said Brian Sutter, director of marketing at Wasp Barcode Technologies. “We believe that our new series of products, the WWS450 2D barcode scanner and the DT10 mobile computer, will attract business owners because of the products’ ability to collect data quickly and accurately in diverse environments.”

Features of WWS450 2D barcode scanner with base include:
· Read 1D barcodes up to 20 inches away and 2D barcodes up to 12 inches away
· Withstands 4’ drops to concrete
· Holds up to 160 scans in buffer memory should scanner be out of range
· Included base station charges WWS450 from desktop or can be mounted on the wall
· Supports up to seven scanners per base station

Features of DT10 mobile computer include:
· Works on Windows CE 5.0 operating system
· 128 MB RAM and 256 MB Flash
· 240 x 320 QVGA, TFT color touch screen and backlight
· 23-key keypad, includes 5-position joystick
· Integrated laser scanner for reading barcodes from 2 to 25 inches away

Pricing for the WWS450 2D barcode scanner with base starts at $695. The DT10 mobile computer starts at $949. For a complete solution, customers can choose from a wide range of packages with barcode scanners, mobile computers, barcode printers and software.

Source:http://www.pr.com/press-release/386645

01 Synergy to unveil ExhibitionApp for iPhone & Android at India Soft 2012

January 23rd, 2012

indiasoft201201 Synergy will unveil a range of iPhone & Android Applications — including ExhibitionApp — at India Soft, an international IT meet scheduled for March 2012. Over 350 business partners and global enterprises from 75 countries are expected to participate in the two-day event.

01 Synergy will launch ExhibitionApp, which is designed specifically for the tradeshow industry, it features real-time show alerts and interactive floor maps. Users can schedule tradeshow information while travelling to the show or download it to the phone for later reference. Exhibitor information can also be downloaded to prevent a user from having to carry marketing materials and brochures around the show. 01Synergy will also launch the Pro version of Golf eScorer at IndiaSoft 2012.

We look forward to meet & interact with the India Soft 2012 delegates and forge business alliances.

How the BBC Micro started a computing revolution

January 11th, 2012

Dan Frydman remembers clearly how the computer he used at school in the 1980s changed his life. Now 38, he was one of the generation who grew up with classroom computers that almost anyone could use to write self-contained programs – the equivalent of today’s smartphone apps.

The computer was the BBC Micro, a computing revolution dressed in light brown plastic. Made by Acorn Computers of Cambridge, the first version, released in December 1981, included a simple programming language called BBC BASIC which even very young children could follow. And with coin arcades offering video games such as Space Invaders, this was their chance to create their own – free – version.

“We all had a bash [at programming it],” Frydman says. Though he moved into architecture, he came back to programming, designing and writing websites: “Without that early introduction to programming as something that was logical rather than scarily scientific, I don’t think I’d have got into it,” he says.

Originally called the Proton, the BBC Micro got its name after Acorn, then just two years old, won the contract to make the hardware for the BBC’s then-ongoing computer literacy project. It was a contract that was the making of Acorn – and, arguably, the modern world, for a descendant of Acorn’s chip design methods now powers every mobile phone, including the smartphones used by millions.

Neil Kinson, 42, says the appearance of the machine when he was at school in north-east England “inspired people to get under [its] covers… I had visions of my own little software empire.” Though that didn’t happen, he went on to study software engineering at university “otherwise I would have done a pure physics degree”.

Another then-pupil, Nicholas Radcliffe, recalls that he “ended up producing commercial software for my local education authority” – and later use that skill to fund himself through university. “That BBC Micro experience led to everything I’ve done since, which has included being part of the formation of the Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre (EPCC), spinning out my group from there as Quadstone Limited, a VC [venture capital]-based Edinburgh-based software company that was eventually acquired by Portrait Software.”

Alhough the BBC only specified that 12,000 should be made (so viewers of its new Computer Programme would be able to share the experience of the new microcomputing revolution), uptake was so rapid that, in 1982, 24,000 were sold – and schools were soon ordering them by the thousand. By the 1990s, when PCs running Microsoft software began to supplant the ageing BBC devices in the classroom, a million had been sold.

The Micro wasn’t cheap: prices started at £235 (£700 at current prices) and £335 (£1,000 at current prices) for the Model B, which became the iconic version. Prices rose slightly (to £299 and £399 – not that much more than a computer would cost today).

The specifications, by today’s standards, were minuscule: a processor running at two megahertz, more than a thousand times slower than a typical CPU today, and 32 kilobytes of Ram. You had to plug it into a TV set as there was no monitor output. There was no hard drive; programs were stored on cassette tape, from which they could be played back or on to which they could be recorded. (Program names were also limited to a maximum of 10 characters.) Any of the 163,000 points, or pixels, on the screen could display eight colours, or flash in eight combinations of two colours. Today, screens offer millions of available colours and millions of pixels.

Yet the BBC Micro’s arrival in classrooms as part of the government’s initiative to drive computing use in schools revolutionised computing in Britain. Scores of small games and other software companies were set up by people who had got their start writing programs on the BBC Micro, and on other computers from the period, including the Sinclair ZX Spectrum, which also ran BASIC and was substantially cheaper at £80 (£240 at current prices).

But the arrival of those “more powerful” PCs spelt the death knell for the self-made classroom programmers: the new machines didn’t have BASIC, and pupils were now taught “ICT” (information and communications technology) rather than coding.

Part of the effect has been the ongoing skills shortage in programming and the falling enrolment in university courses. Radcliffe thinks that “ironically, programming is much harder to get into now, for kids and others. It’s a weird combination of things. Back then, every machine came with BASIC or similar. Programming was a much bigger part of experience. I also think there was less to learn, and the machines were less abstract. You could just set bits to draw on the screen. Now you have layer upon layer of abstraction to get through.”

Where would he start now? “I think quite often about what I would be doing today if I were 12 or 14, and I’m certain the answer is badgering my parents for an iPad and a developer kit. The iPad is appealing because it does have all those sensors and access to so much stuff, and because of your ability to turn the whole device into a physical manifestation of something. But the learning curve to get the first thing working is really large in that environment; you can’t really do it as a first thing.”

Kinson suggests “it is simply a case of building the right curriculum, as virtually all of the infrastructure to do this exists today, but stripping back one or two layers of the usability of some of today’s tools to ensure people learn the fundamental principles and skills”.

But even while some wrestle with reviving the BBC Micro’s legacy, it lives on in at least one form. Acorn, Apple and VLSI Technology teamed up to create a new company, Advanced Risc Machines – later shortened just to Arm – to make better versions of the specialised low-power chips that had run in the Acorn Archimedes computer, a successor to the BBC Micro.

An early ARM chip powered Apple’s handheld Newton device. But ARM soon discovered new markets in mobile phones, and now billions of chips using ARM’s designs power every smartphone in use, including the iPhone, BlackBerry, and Android devices.

Source:http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/jan/10/bbc-micro-school-computer-revolution?newsfeed=true

Intel Confronts Qualcomm in Vegas Mobile-Device Standoff: Tech

January 3rd, 2012

A looming clash between Intel Corp. and Qualcomm Inc. will take center stage at the Consumer Electronics Show next week in Las Vegas, with both chipmakers seeking to control the future of mobile devices.

Qualcomm Chief Executive Officer Paul Jacobs will demonstrate notebook computers based on his company’s chips on Jan. 10, highlighting a push into an area dominated by Intel. Later that day, Intel CEO Paul Otellini will take the same stage to announce phones featuring his chips, renewing a decade-long push to get into a market that Qualcomm controls.

The popularity of smartphones and tablets has put the companies on a collision course. The market for mobile-phone chips will grow 40 percent to $29.9 billion by 2015, according to the Linley Group. With more consumers using handheld devices as their primary access to the Internet, Intel can’t afford to stay only in the realm of personal computers, said Jim McGregor, chief technology strategist for research firm In-Stat.

“For Intel, it’s a ‘we have to be there,’” he said. “Never bet against a computing device that fits in your pocket. I do more on my smartphone than any other device.”

For years, Intel processors failed to win orders in the mobile-phone market, mostly because they were too energy-hungry to work in a device that consumers expect to last days between charges. Qualcomm and other mobile-phone chipmakers, meanwhile, haven’t had much impact on Intel’s dominance of laptops because their products can’t run most computer software.

ARM Technology

The success of Apple Inc.’s iPad, which runs smartphone chips based on ARM Holdings Plc designs, proved to consumers that phone processors could deliver enough performance for computing tasks. Microsoft Corp., the top software maker, also is putting pressure on Intel to adapt. After years of working exclusively with Intel’s x86 technology, a partnership known as “Wintel,” Microsoft’s pending Windows 8 operating system will also support ARM chips.

Qualcomm and other developers of smartphone components license their technology from ARM, an English company that doesn’t make its own chips. The change to Windows will give those manufacturers a new opening into the PC industry.

“Now we have the world’s largest software company saying they’re committed to this kind of platform for their flagship operating system,” Rob Chandhok, a senior vice president at San Diego-based Qualcomm, said in an interview.

PCs shifting to ARM chips could cost Intel $2.2 billion in sales by 2015, according to Daniel Amir, an analyst at Lazard Capital Markets in San Francisco.

Same Experience

Consumers expect their laptop computers to behave the same as their phones, Qualcomm’s Chandhok said. That means they turn on instantly and are always connected to the Internet. Because Qualcomm designed its chips from the ground up for that kind of use, they have an advantage, he said.

Intel says the reverse is true. Smartphones are becoming more like personal computers, giving an edge to Intel’s technology, said Bill Calder, a spokesman for the Santa Clara, California-based company.

“We believe we have an opportunity to play there, and we’ve been working hard on multiple fronts to make that a reality,” Calder said in an interview.

Intel’s experience with previous versions of Windows and its ability to support all existing software will make systems that use its chips more attractive, particularly for companies that need a secure environment, he said. That’s because existing security software may not be compatible with computers based on non-Intel chips.

Advanced Techniques

Its role as the world’s largest chipmaker, with the most advanced production factories, also will help Intel develop high-performance chips that use less battery power, Calder said.

Jen-Hsun Huang, CEO of Nvidia Corp., which is expanding into ARM-based processors for mobile devices, says it won’t matter if Intel can produce more efficient chips.

Too many electronics and software companies have shifted their efforts to ARM and other mobile technology, in part because Intel’s dominance of PCs made it hard to compete in that market, he said.

“The amount of innovation around ARM has reached critical mass,” Huang said. “If you’re a cell-phone maker or even a car company, you would absolutely choose ARM.”

Neither side will have an easy time pushing into the other’s turf, said In-Stat’s McGregor.

“It’s going to be as difficult for ARM to get into computing devices as it is for x86 to get into mobile devices,” he said.

Holding Their Ground

McGregor expects Windows 8 devices to debut first on Intel’s chips, rather than ARM versions. While Intel could get its processors into new smartphones, those deals probably won’t translate into significant orders in 2012, he said.

Qualcomm’s Chandhok said that even though there have been more test systems — so-called development platforms — for Windows 8 produced on Intel chips, his company will be providing ARM-based versions. Microsoft plans to begin selling both versions of the operating system at the same time, he said.

Catherine Brooker, a spokeswoman for Redmond, Washington- based Microsoft, said the company hasn’t shared details about when the software will be released.

In addition to announcing new contracts with phone manufacturers, Intel’s Otellini plans to showcase the company’s Ultrabook project during his speech. The company is encouraging PC makers to make lighter laptops that start more quickly and go longer between recharges, offering an experience closer to that delivered by Apple’s iPad and MacBook Air.

More to Lose?

Intel is counting on the effort to help maintain its leadership in the notebook market, said Lazard’s Amir.

“You need to be sure that you’re not losing the notebook,” said Amir, who has a “neutral” rating on Intel.

Of the two sides, Intel probably has more to lose and less to gain, Amir said. Grabbing 10 percent of the market for mobile-phone chips wouldn’t be enough to add significant growth to Intel’s sales. Conversely, stronger competition in PCs, where it has more than 80 percent of the market, would hurt Intel’s high average selling prices, he said.

Intel’s processors can cost more than $4,000 each, with an average selling price of about $107, according to Mercury Research in Cave Creek, Arizona. That compares with an average selling price of less than $20 for the typical applications processor in a mobile phone.

Lazard’s Amir estimates that ARM-based processors will grab as much as a third of the market for mobile computers by 2015, up from 8 percent last year. The total market will grow to 340 million units in 2015 from 275 million in 2010, he predicts.

Faster Growth

The smartphone market has even bigger growth prospects. It will reach 1.1 billion units by 2015, up from 300 million last year, Amir said. In that period, Intel will increase its share from zero to 13 percent, he estimates.

While phones and PCs are currently separate markets, new software and hardware may blur those distinctions. In the future, consumers and companies will have a wider variety of choices that don’t fit the traditional definitions, In-Stat’s McGregor said. It’s up to the chip companies to evolve.

The winners will most probably be companies that produce packages of chips that deliver Internet connections, graphics and processing, he said. For now, Qualcomm is in the lead.

“They’re definitely in pole position,” McGregor said. “Intel even admits they are playing a little catch-up in some of the areas that they need to be competitive on.”

Source:http://news.businessweek.com/article.asp?documentKey=1377-a76PfxHs2p8w-727EHQO0I5DE9IPM2623IEBJVR

Intel launches new mobile platform named ‘Cedar Trail’

January 2nd, 2012

US chipmaker Intel Corp launched its new low-power mobile platform on Thursday that is to be used in netbook computers by some hardware manufacturers next year, including Acer Inc (宏碁) and Asustek Computer Inc (華碩).

The third-generation Atom processor-based platform, codenamed “Cedar Trail,” could deliver up to 10 hours of battery life, while reducing power consumption by 20 percent compared with the previous generation, Intel said in a statement.

Low-power devices such as netbooks and healthcare IT products running on the new platform are set to be available early next year from Acer, Asustek, Hewlett-Packard Co, Lenovo Group Ltd (聯想), Samsung Electronics Co and Toshiba Corp, according to the statement.

The launch shows Intel’s commitment to the cooling netbook market, which has seen sales slow because of growing sales of tablet computers.

Netbook sales account for 20 percent of the total mobile PC market, but that share is set to drop to 10 percent over the next two to three years as vendors release new lower-priced tablets, according market research firm International Data Corp (IDC).

IDC forecasts that netbook shipments are set to decrease by 9 percent to 32.4 million units this year.

While Samsung is reportedly switching its focus from netbooks to ultrabooks and ultra-portable products, Acer said it would hold on to its netbook business based on growing demand in emerging markets, such as Indonesia and India, where netbooks have become important devices for students.

Source:http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2011/12/31/2003522018

2011: When mobile tech came home

December 30th, 2011

I have been a mobile gadget enthusiast for as long as I can remember, largely due to the potential I could envision it providing once properly evolved. I used a handheld PC for a year as my primary computer to prove it was possible. It wasn’t optimal but it got the job done.

This year has been a pivotal one in the mobile space, as the gadgets and apps have matured to the point that for many folks they can be the primary tool of choice. I recently realized with a bit of shock that whether out running around or at my home, a mobile device of some sort is now what I usually reach for first when I need to get something done.

This year the smartphone and the tablet have both evolved to be full-blown computers that can do just about everything we need to do. The hardware inside these gadgets is more than powerful enough to handle whatever we throw at them, and the apps are good tools to leverage that power.

Since a lot of what we do is online, the mobile web browser plays a big role in mobile tech taking the center stage for lots of folks. Even on a lowly smartphone the web browsers are so good that we suffer no compromises by reaching for a gadget instead of sitting at a “real” computer. We can do anything we need to do, quickly, and then drop the phone back in the bag/pocket where it lives.

Tablets have extended this utility even further than the smartphone, simply due to the larger screens. The apps are now good enough to tackle most any job, and the web browsers are as good as those on the desktop. Unless there is a special need, sitting at a computer is no longer required. It is as easy as grabbing the tablet, hitting a button, and doing what needs to be done. No compromises, no delays, just immediate utility.

The evolution of mobile tech will continue for the foreseeable future, and at breakneck speed. We will soon be doing the unthinkable on our mobile gear, and spending even less time in front of a computer as a result. Never in history has so much power been in the hands of so many, and it will only get better as time marches on. It is a great time to be a participant in the mobile tech sector.

Source:http://www.zdnet.com/blog/mobile-news/2011-when-mobile-tech-came-home/6247

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes