Posts Tagged ‘iPad’

iPad pushes Apple to top of the global PC market past HP

February 1st, 2012

Back in the mid-1970‘s a young engineer named Steve Wozniak pitched his boss at Hewlett-Packard on his idea for building a personal computer. Back then, computers were offered as kits designed for techies to build, not the finished, consumer products they are today. HP told Wozniak it wasn’t interested so he went on and joined his pal Steve Jobs to start a company called Apple Computer.

Fast forward about 35 years and Apple is looking in the rear view mirror at HP as it just passed the computer giant as the leading volume producer of PCs in the world, according to the latest research by Canalys covering the fourth quarter of 2011.

The biggest factor in Apple’s favor in the results is that research firms like Canalys now count tablets as PCs. Apple shipped over 15 million iPads and 5 million Macs in the quarter, giving it 17% of the total 120 million PCs shipped globally in Q4.

Tablet sales also boosted the total PC market (desktops, netbooks, notebooks and tablets) into positive growth territory for the quarter. Canalys says that minus tablets the PC market actually declined 0.4% compared to the same quarter a year ago; with tablets the overall market grew 16% from a year ago.

Of the top five PC vendors Canalys said that only Lenovo managed to increase its market share, a mere two points, compared to Apple’s six-point gain over the same quarter a year ago. Acer, Dell and HP – the hardest hit – all lost market share.

Canalys says one of HP’s key challenges will be to regroup following it’s disastrous launch of the TouchPad that the company chose to discontinue after only about six months on the market.

“Currently, HP is pursuing a Windows strategy for its pad portfolio, producing enterprise-focused products, such as the recently launched Slate 2, until the launch of Windows 8,” said Canalys Analyst Tim Coulling. “However, questions remain over Microsoft’s entry into the consumer pad space. While early demonstrations of the Window 8 operating system seem promising, Microsoft must focus its efforts on creating an intuitive user experience that is far less resource intensive.”

Pads accounted for 22% of total PC shipments during Q4 2011. In addition to Apple’s strong performance, Canalys notes that two new tablet entries, the Amazon Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet by Barnes and Noble, helped boost tablet sales in the U.S. with Kindle Fire claiming second place behind the iPad and the Nook Tablet coming in 5th for market share.

Could Ultrabooks challenge tablets?
Looking ahead, Canalys says the new generation of Ultrabooks promoted by Intel and its many hardware partners will take some time to have a serious impact on the market. Ultrabooks are very thin and lightweight, Windows-based notebooks similar conceptually to Apple’s MacBook Air.

“We expect Ultrabook volumes to see limited adoption through the first half of 2012, before finally gaining momentum later in the year as price points decline and Intel launches a new line of processors and embarks on an aggressive marketing campaign,” said Canalys Research Analyst Michael Kauh. “In the short term though, vendors will experience more pressure in the netbook and notebook segments, especially with Apple’s annual iPad refresh approaching.”

Numerous reports suggest Apple will unveil a successor to the iPad, dubbed the iPad 3, either next month or in April.

Source:http://tabtimes.com/news/ittech-stats-research/2012/01/31/ipad-pushes-apple-top-global-pc-market-past-hp

Apple launches recycling scheme for iPhones, iPads, Macs and PCs in UK

January 17th, 2012

Apple has launched a recycling scheme that could help you make money from your old iPhone, iPad, Mac or even Windows PC.

The Reuse and Recycling Programme will be operated by Dataserv GmbH and will give you the chance to get rid of old or unwanted technology.

“Apple’s commitment to the environment includes finding the most efficient ways to reuse or recycle electronic equipment at the end of its useful life, including iPhone, iPad, Mac or PC computers, and displays from any manufacturer. You may even get some money for your old equipment,” a message on the website reads.

“Whether it’s an iPhone, iPad, Mac or PC computer, working or not, we’ll take it and determine if it qualifies for reuse and has a monetary value. If it does, the amount will be credited directly into your bank account. If it doesn’t, you can recycle it responsibly through one of our free recycling programmes.”

To get started, you can visit the website and answer a few questions about the device you wish to recycle. You’ll then get an estimate of its value from Dataserv, who will send you a pre-paid shipping label.

You can then send the item and upon receipt it will be verified. After that, the value of the device will be paid directly into your bank account.

You can also now recycle old iPods and mobile phones through Apple.

Source:http://www.itworld.com/hardware/241659/apple-launches-recycling-scheme-iphones-ipads-macs-and-pcs-uk

Corpus Christi Unveils iPad Program

January 6th, 2012

Corpus Christi School replaced classroom computers with iPads early in the school year, and now teachers are using the mini-computers to teach language arts, social studies, math and science to the 255 students.

  Corpus is one of only 1,000 schools in the country with a kindergarten through eighth grade iPad program of this nature.

  Two years ago, Corpus had utilized a $30,000 donation from parent Anthony Marguleas to buy 30 Apple laptops that were distributed to students in third and fourth grades on a 1-to-2 basis.

  However, when the Corpus Christi technology committee, headed by Bill Sewell, looked into expanding the program for the entire school, the cost was prohibitive.

  That’s when the idea of iPads was considered. In addition to a more reasonable cost (about $500 per unit), there’s more room on students’ desks and teachers can easily see students’ faces as they work at the computer. Carrying the thin book-like instrument back and forth to school is also easy.

  Another advantage is battery life’10 hours in comparison to the three to four hours of a laptop; a school using laptops needs to have lots of electrical outlets to keep them charged.

  By early October, a fiber optics cable network was installed throughout the campus and the school had leased 140 iPads for $22 a month, which covers lease payments interest, taxes, an e-Waste fee and insurance. And the Corpus computer lab, which students used to visit once a week to work on computers, was converted to a classroom.

  At the end of three years, the school will own the iPads for a $1 each buyout. Currently Corpus is now sub-leasing them to families with the intent that the families will own them after 36 lease payments.

  Other families opted to buy their own iPads or already had them, and were offered insurance through the school at $109 per iPad for three years of coverage.

  ’It was the digital equivalent of when music went from records to iTunes,’ said Sewell about the iPad program. ‘Schools can’t afford to keep up with the costs of computer technology.’

  Sewell, who is the president of Wiredrive, which makes a business application for managing media, said ‘The current situation at most schools is they are constantly having to fund technology upgrades. In the past, schools purchased enough computers for a lab, typically between 20 and 40, which meant raising $30 to $50,000 just for hardware’it didn’t include software and infrastructure.’

  He noted the current goal in most schools is to have a computer for every student. ‘That forces the budget to grow 10 times with traditional computers, which means it simply will not be possible for most schools,’ he said.

  After Corpus decided to drop the laptop program, Marquez Elementary, an Apple Distinguished School, purchased 35 of the Corpus computers and now has a 1-to-1 program for third and fourth graders.

  The future of education was apparent in an eighth-grade Corpus classroom, where students were using an online interactive textbook to learn algebra.

  The teacher explained concepts on the white board, and then students worked sample problems on the iPad. Those answers were automatically relayed to the teacher, who instantly knew whether students were grasping the ideas and which students needed more help.

  ’Computers are no longer a destination, but a tool kit,’ said Principal Catherine Carvalho, noting that textbook companies are just starting to make individual textbook applications for the iPad called ePubs.

  Through a recent grant from an anonymous donor, Corpus now plans to implement English, reading, math, science and social studies for grades K-5 and science, social studies and language arts for grades K-6 via ePubs.

  ’Students will no longer have to lug heavy backpacks filled with books to and from school,’ said Carvalho. ‘We also know that different students learn through different modalities. This technology is good for visual, kinetic and auditory learners.’

  Sixth graders were happy to share their iPad experiences. ‘It’s easier and we get to do all of our work on it,’ Jordan Gurevitch said. ‘It’s lighter to carry around and it’s definitely more fun taking notes.’

  Dillon Malaret noted, ‘I can type faster than I can write.’

  ’What’s neat is textbooks have Web sites and you can find chapter reviews and practice tests,’ Alexancia Angeleed said.

  Still there are glitches. ‘Sometimes it kind of messes up notes,’ Isabella Grecco said. ‘I was working on my story and it disappeared.’

  Kindergarteners learn to carry their iPads by holding them like a ‘teddy bear.’ At that age, the students are given a stylus to use on the touch screen keyboard to help them develop small motor skills.

  The vice president of education at Apple Computers, Stephanie Carrillo, recently made a special visit to Corpus to gather information about the iPad’s use in the classroom.

  ’She listened to suggestions from the school administration regarding ways to accelerate the process of ‘matching’ iPad apps with the new Common Core State Standards, as well as encouraging textbook companies to continue to convert elementary school textbooks into iPad apps, thus providing for a ‘greener’ set of digital curriculum tools and lightening the load in students’ backpacks,’ said parent Cathy Gallagher.

  ’This is the reality of technology and it’s only going to accelerate,’ Sewell said. ‘It’s a whole new platform (iOS, Android) that uses apps, not programs. Within two years, the iPad has rendered our laptops irrelevant, and most textbook publishers are creating their digital textbooks for tablet only. These tablets are 50 to 75 percent less expensive than laptops, which means schools can realistically reach 1-to-1 levels.’

Source:http://www.palisadespost.com/news/content.php?id=7186

OnLive’s Mobile App Gives Your iPad the Power of a Gaming PC

December 9th, 2011

OnLive has been around for a little while now, but it’s no less improbable than it was when it was announced (at which time some gaming blogs called it a technically impossible scam): a service that streams full games, from major publishers, right to your TV or computer, no console necessary. This week, the company will release mobile apps for smartphones and tablets. Let me say that again, in case you don’t realize how bonkers this is: You can now play Batman: Arkham Asylum, a demanding and graphically intense game, on your iPad. And it works.

WHAT’S NEW
OnLive’s new mobile app is available for iPad, Honeycomb tablets (like the Motorola Xoom), the Kindle Fire, and Android smartphones. You get access to the full OnLive catalogue (more on what that means below), and some games are specially redesigned to take advantage of the new capabilities afforded by tablets and smartphones, namely touch. It’ll all be released sometime on December 8th.

WHAT’S GOOD
This is insane, you guys. When it works, it works just the way it’s supposed to. You really can play full console and PC games on an iPad (my test device). When you have a fast enough internet connection, video quality ranges from adequate to excellent. The fact that you’re streaming means there’s never any downloading at all–you press “play,” and boom, you’re playing the game. Games also start up super quickly, with hardly any loading or waiting times at all. Saving works nicely–games are saved properly, without you having to really worry about whether it’ll be saved. And you can pick up and continue your game from whatever device you want.
The controller is also great–nicely weighted, not slippery or cheap-feeling at all, and it automatically connects to whatever gadget you’re using, usually by Bluetooth. It costs $50, which is pretty reasonable and, I would say, an essential purchase if you plan on using mobile OnLive.
The “What’s Bad” section is going to be longer than this section, because it does have problems, but also because what’s good about it is so simple that there’s not really a ton to say about it. You can play PS3 games on your iPad. It’s crazy.

WHAT’S BAD
There are times when it doesn’t work. My home internet connection, which ranges from around 10 to 12 Mbps, was mostly up to the task, but if your connection dips below 5 Mbps, games almost become unplayable. There’s some kind of dynamic resolution shift, like Netflix uses, to lower the quality of the video as your bandwidth drops to maintain smoothness. But the thing is, it doesn’t selectively change the resolution, so stuff like text and menus, even OnLive’s own menus, can quickly become unreadable. I also noticed a lag when I was using a slower connection, which is basically unacceptable for gamers. And even on my decent-to-pretty-good home connection, sometimes OnLive would have trouble maintaining a high resolution, for no reason I could tell.
Video quality relies on both your internet speed and your latency, or the distance you are from one of OnLive’s three major server centers. From my apartment in Brooklyn, the closest server is in the D.C. area–not too far away. There’s also one in Dallas and one in the Bay Area, so folks in not-so-weird places like South Florida, Wisconsin, and Minnesota may have a much harder time than I did.

OnLive for Mobile: OnLive
This is a basically inscrutable and ludicrously complex thing OnLive has done, so every once in awhile, something weird will happen, like when my screen in L.A. Noire suddenly went black and forced me to restart the app. Or when Lego Harry Potter: Years 5-7 developed an unusable lag (also fixed with a restart). Or when Batman: Arkham City tried to explain how to get Bruce Wayne to fight, but gave me the keyboard controls rather than the controller’s, leaving me to stare at the controller trying to figure out where the “D” button was (it doesn’t exist). The controller problem popped up in L.A. Noire, too, where I had to experimentally push every button to figure out how to do something because the on-screen instructions were not tailored to the way I was playing. I’m using the app in prerelease, so I won’t make any judgment about how it’ll function in the long run, but I do hope it’ll be more reliable.

Oh, and there’s no vibrate function on the controller when used with the iPad. That’s troublesome for certain games, like L.A. Noire, which doesn’t exactly require vibration but which makes a lot more sense with it. And you can’t buy games from within the iPad version, due to Apple’s weird rules about in-app purchasing. (This does not hold true for Android devices like smartphones, Honeycomb tablets, or the Kindle Fire.)

I didn’t get a chance to try OnLive on a mobile (3G or 4G) connection. OnLive says that a smartphone connection can get by with a slower connection, around 2 Mbps, which is about average, or a little higher than average, for 3G in well-serviced areas. I am dubious about this. But 4G–4G LTE, not that HSPA+ nonsense AT&T is pushing–should be perfect, and actually a pretty great showcase for what LTE can do.

The Catalogue: The list of available games is limited. This isn’t like Netflix, where the idea is to provide you with access to everything, from every channel; OnLive said more than once that they think of their system as a platform just like the PS3 or Xbox 360. So they won’t have every game, and they certainly won’t get any first-party games from, say, Nintendo. That’s a nice explanation, though it also means they may never get any blockbuster first-party games–who’s going to make exclusives for them?

And the catalogue is weak for now. There are some top-tier games, for sure, and OnLive is fully aware that this is their main weakness, but in a given week, OnLive will have maybe half of the top ten third-party games. At the moment the catalogue has less than 200 games, and only a handful of those are big name games. OnLive has been pushing in the past few months to get more and bigger games, so I think/hope we’ll see the catalogue growing fairly quickly from here on out.

THE PRICE
The app is free. Games cost the same no matter what platform you play them on, be it Xbox 360 or OnLive, which means new games cost around $50. You can also rent games for a three- or five-day period for much cheaper–the former costs $6, and the latter $9. Or you can spring for a subscription, which costs $10 per month, gives you access to lots of older games for free, and cuts the price of new games (basically, the games you want) by 30%.
I should also say that I consider the controller to be a must-purchase, at $50, and some sort of stand is definitely necessary for the iPad (that magnetic cover thing for the iPad 2 works just fine in its “upright” mode).

THE VERDICT
OnLive isn’t perfect, and if it was a less ambitious service, I wouldn’t be so inclined to forgive it. But the thing is, it’s just about the most ambitious idea in gaming I’ve ever heard, and the fact that most of the time it delivers on the promise of hardware-agnostic high-end gaming is enough that I’m really excited about it. It’s hard to explain how amazing it is to start up a game like L.A. Noire on an iPad: you get one of those cognitive dissonances, like “this is a thing which should not exist.” And yet it does!

Yeah, you need a reliable, fast internet connection. But if you, say, travel a lot, and stay in hotels with decent internet? Congratulations, you and your iPad can now play some great games all by yourselves. Awesome.

Source:http://www.popsci.com/gadgets/article/2011-12/hands-onlives-mobile-app-gives-your-ipad-power-gaming-pc

How the iPad 2 Became My Favorite Computer

December 8th, 2011

Ever since Apple announced its tablet nearly two years ago, the Internet has been awash in discussion of this question. Most of it has had a pretty theoretical feel and has gravitated towards conventional wisdom. A piece by Gotta Be Mobile’s Will Shanklin comes to the typical conclusions:

Whether you can replace your laptop with an iPad is going to depend on what your needs are. In early 2010, casual computer users could arguably replace a laptop with an iPad. Now it’s a no-brainer. When it comes to content consumption, a tablet is lighter, more portable, more comfortable, and more personal.

If part of your life involves creating professional-level content, tablets still have a long way to go before becoming your primary device. They don’t qualify now, and they won’t next year. Customers aren’t used to spending more than $10 for most tablet apps, so those consumer expectations could slow the march in this direction too.

The answer, therefore, hasn’t changed too much in a year. Tablets are moving in a “primary computing” direction, but they aren’t exactly sprinting. Maybe we’ll check back next year to see if the “tablets are for content consumption, notebooks are for content creation” cliche has changed. Right now it’s as true as ever.

I respectfully disagree with Shanklin. I think it’s possible to use an iPad as one’s primary device for professional-level content creation. Actually, scratch that. I’m positive it’s possible — because I’ve been doing it for the past three months, and I’ve been having a really good time.

My iPad 2 and ZaggFolio, in the press room at IFA in Berlin, September 2011.
This hasn’t been one of those experiments-for-the-sake-of-experimentation in which someone temporarily forsakes a PC for another device in order to write about the experience (like, say, this). No, I’ve been using the iPad for my daily activities–running Technologizer, writing for TIME, CNET, and AllBusiness.com, and more — because I find it to be the preferable tool in multiple respects. I’ve been using it about 80 percent of the time, and using my MacBook Air about 20 percent of the time. I have no desire to go back.

If this startles you, I understand. It seems to startle most folks who notice I’m doing it. I’m startled myself. Or at least I was at first — at this point, I’ve been doing it long enough that I forget there’s anything unusual about it until someone reminds me.

Add a Keyboard
It all started in August. I read Walt Mossberg’s review of four portable Bluetooth keyboards for the iPad 2 at All Things D and was intrigued — especially by the ZaggFolio, which cleverly builds a truly notebook-like keyboard into an attractive case. So I bought one. The ZaggFolio changed the way I use my iPad, and that changed my life.

Without the ZaggFolio, I used the iPad mostly for reading and light productivity. I’d happily type brief e-mails on it, but never anything as long as a meaty blog post or article. But Zagg’s no-compromise keyboard made typing every bit as comfy as it is on a notebook. All of a sudden I could write hundreds of words on the iPad. Or thousands of them.

(Side note: The ZaggFolio I bought was part of an early production run that was defective — its clasp didn’t shut securely. And after a few weeks, one of its keys fell off. I ended up replacing it with the “Logitech Keyboard Case by Zagg for iPad 2,” which puts a similar keyboard in a low-profile tray that doubles as a protector for the iPad 2′s screen. I prefer both of these models to rivals such as the Adonit Writer which don’t match the full-sized, full-travel goodness of Zagg’s designs.)

Blogsy, my go-to iPad blogging app.
Of course, having a nice keyboard for an iPad doesn’t instantly turn it into a pleasing laptop replacement. You’re typing into a radically different set of apps than are available on a notebook. Once I got the ZaggFolio, I had to figure out how to blog, edit photos, and perform other tasks I do every day.

I was just getting started with this challenge when I hopped on a plane to fly to Berlin, where I was attending the IFA electronics show. I took my iPad 2, the ZaggFolio, and my MacBook Air. It was during this trip that the iPad became my primary computing device, even though I was still learning how to be productive with it.

And it was one specific thing about the iPad that made it so useful on the trip: I could use it for ten hours at a pop without worrying about plugging it in.

I can’t overemphasize how important this is to my particular workdays. Even when I’m not traveling, I spend a lot of time bopping around San Francisco and the Bay Area, attending conferences, visiting tech companies, working out of hotel lobbies, and generally having spotty access to power outlets. With the Air, or almost any other portable computer I’ve ever used, I’m lucky to get three or four hours of life out of a charge, and therefore have to bring my power brick and obsess about plugging in whenever possible. It’s an enormous hassle, and sometimes I simply run out of juice.

With the iPad, I didn’t even bother to bring the power adapter to the IFA show: I worked all day, going online as much as I wanted, without fully draining the battery. I ended up only using the MacBook Air in my hotel room.

Beyond the jaw-droppingly good battery life, my iPad 2 has one other hardware attribute that’s a huge upgrade over the Air: It has AT&T wireless broadband built in. There are PCs with embedded wireless, of course, but not Macs. And even though I’ve used both the Air and iPads with Mi-Fi mobile routers in the past, I like the built-in wireless on my particular iPad much, much better than any external connectivity solution. I don’t have to worry about toting another device (or draining my phone’s battery, as I would if I tethered it to the iPad). I don’t have to futz with Wi-Fi hotspots. I’m just online — and it makes me so much more productive that I don’t object a bit to paying AT&T for the service. (I even happily forked over a stiff fee for international roaming in Berlin and during a later trip I took to Tokyo.)

Okay: The Zagg keyboards are good. The iPad’s battery life is good. Its built-in broadband is good. I quickly discovered yet another simple joy of using the iPad as a blogging/writing tool: Its utter predictability and simplicity.

Tasks at Hand
When you use a Windows PC — and, to a somewhat lesser extent, a Mac — you get dragged down by the responsibilities and obligations of using a computer. Even if you’re very familiar with a program, you need to bob and weave your way around icons and menu items you don’t require at the moment to get to the ones you do need. Programs other than the one you’re using may vie for your attention, possibly alerting you, for instance, that they need to be updated. You might have to rummage around in folders to find documents. When you multitask between apps, you need to juggle their windows, maximizing or minimizing them as you go. If a program stalls, you’ll likely need to kill it manually.

With the iPad, all that goes away. You can devote nearly every second of your time to the task at hand, rather than babysitting a balky computer. I don’t feel like I’m “using an iPad to write.” I’m just writing. It’s a far more tranquil, focused experience than using a PC or Mac. It’s also easier to dive in, do a bit of work as time allows, then dive out — especially since the iPad’s instant-on feature is more reliably instant than the alleged instant-on capabilities of traditional computers.

TouchDraw, a powerful iPad drawing app. (I didn’t draw the hourglass in it–I imported it, and composited it with text.)
Those facts helps make up for one of the challenges of using the iPad for productivity: Many tasks are at least a bit slower or more unwieldy than with a computer, and some things that can be done with one program on a Windows PC or a Mac require several of them on the iPad. When I started using the iPad as my primary device, for example, I thought that Photoshop would be simply irreplaceable. Then I discovered that I could do about 85 percent of the things I do with Photoshop by using several iPad apps together as an ad-hoc graphics suite, including PhotoForge2, TouchDraw, and others. Photoshop remains the more powerful tool, and on the iPad, I only have access to the fonts that Apple provides. But I can apply fancy effects, layer together multiple images into a collage, and dress up type on the iPad.

(Wait, how can you match the precision of a mouse and the efficiency of a big-screen display with the iPad’s touch interface and dinky screen? Well…you can’t. But for most of my day-to-day needs I can come closer than I would have expected before I gave it a shot.)

As for writing and editing, I usually use Apple’s own Pages when I’m creating a manuscript that someone is going to expect to get as a Word document, such as stories for TIME’s dead-tree version. Pages has maybe five percent of the features of Microsoft Word, and for the type of writing I usually do…that’s a virtue! It makes it easier to concentrate: All I really need is a white screen and a word count. (I would like Find/Replace, though.)

When I’m blogging at Technologizer, I use an excellent app called Blogsy, which I prefer to the official WordPress app for iOS. (I’d be even happier if I could just use full-blown WordPress in Safari, but it doesn’t quite work.) For CNET blog posts, I use CNET’s proprietary content-management system, which runs reasonably well in Safari.

Other iPad productivity tools I use every day include the splendid mobile-browser version of Gmail and the iOS versions of theIMO.IM instant messenger and HootSuite Twitter client. I use other apps from time to time and am frequently discovering new ones; most iPads cost only a few dollars, so you can explore the wonders of the App Store without blowing much money.

It’s true that there are things that don’t work very well on the iPad. (One of them, inexplicably, is Google+ — its iOS app is dreadful, and I have trouble with both the mobile-browser and desktop-browser versions.) There are also a few things I don’t do at all on the tablet, such as manage my WordPress installation. (For that, I run Apache, MySQL, and PHP on the MacBook Air.) But I can get most of the jobs I tackle in a normal day done — and the longer I do this, the more efficient I get at it.

Changing Habits
At first, when I traveled out of town, I’d bring the iPad and the MacBook Air but use the iPad most of the time. Now I’ve started bringing only the iPad, unless I have specific reason to think I’ll never a full-blown computer. When I went to Chicago on a business trip last month equipped only with the tablet, it was the first time in two decades that I’d boarded an airplane for work purposes without a laptop on hand.

So would I recommend that everyone ditch their computers in favor of iPads? No, not at all.

All of this works wonderfully well for me, but that’s because of my particular circumstances: It lets me work anywhere and everywhere, without having to think about my battery or remember to bring along much in the way of cables and accessories. (I do usually tote my iPad in a little bag that has room for Apple’s SD card adapter for transferring photos from a digital camera, although I’m just as likely to shoot photos with my iPhone and e-mail them to the iPad.) Even with the added bulk of a Zagg keyboard, the iPad is the smoothest, least cumbersome mobile computing device I’ve ever used, and I rarely leave the house without it.

PhotoForge2, a neat iPad photo editor with a clever interface.
When I’m at home, however, I’m less concerned with power management and portability. Oftentimes, I use my MacBook Air instead of the iPad. But not always — really, unless I have a specific need for a Mac app, I generally grab whatever’s handiest, and don’t give it much thought.

I know I’m still unusual. When I’m out and about and run into my fellow bloggers — most of who have workdays at least roughly similar to mine — they’re intrigued by my iPad-and-Zagg set-up. They ask questions. But I don’t think I’ve convinced any of them to join me. Yet.

Still, I don’t think I’m a wacko. What I’m doing is a viable option today, and it’s only going to get more appealing as tablet apps get more mature. (I’ve seen noticeable improvement to programs such as Blogsy in just the 90 days I’ve been doing this.)

Based on my first three months as a mostly-iPad person, I’m convinced that I’ve arrived in the future of computing–or a rough approximation thereof — a little ahead of schedule. I’m glad I’m here, and I bet I have lots and lots of company soon enough.

Source:http://www.pcworld.com/article/245483/how_the_ipad_2_became_my_favorite_computer.html

How the iPad 2 Became My Favorite Computer

December 6th, 2011

Can the iPad replace a PC?

Ever since Apple announced its tablet nearly two years ago, the Internet has been awash in discussion of this question. Most of it has had a pretty theoretical feel and has gravitated towards conventional wisdom. A piece by Gotta Be Mobile’s Will Shanklin comes to the typical conclusions:

Whether you can replace your laptop with an iPad is going to depend on what your needs are. In early 2010, casual computer users could arguably replace a laptop with an iPad. Now it’s a no-brainer. When it comes to content consumption, a tablet is lighter, more portable, more comfortable, and more personal.

If part of your life involves creating professional-level content, tablets still have a long way to go before becoming your primary device. They don’t qualify now, and they won’t next year. Customers aren’t used to spending more than $10 for most tablet apps, so those consumer expectations could slow the march in this direction too.
The answer, therefore, hasn’t changed too much in a year. Tablets are moving in a “primary computing” direction, but they aren’t exactly sprinting. Maybe we’ll check back next year to see if the “tablets are for content consumption, notebooks are for content creation” cliche has changed. Right now it’s as true as ever.

I respectfully disagree with Shanklin. I think it’s possible to use an iPad as one’s primary device for professional-level content creation. Actually, scratch that. I’m positive it’s possible–because I’ve been doing it for the past three months, and I’ve been having a really good time.

This hasn’t been one of those experiments-for-the-sake-of-experimentation in which someone temporarily forsakes a PC for another device in order to write about the experience (like, say, this). No, I’ve been using the iPad for my daily activities–running Technologizer, writing for TIME, CNET, and AllBusiness.com, and more–because I find it to be the preferable tool in multiple respects. I’ve been using it about 80 percent of the time, and using my MacBook Air about 20 percent of the time. I have no desire to go back.

If this startles you, I understand. It seems to startle most folks who notice I’m doing it. I’m startled myself. Or at least I was at first–at this point, I’ve been doing it long enough that I forget there’s anything unusual about it until someone reminds me.

It all started in August. I read Walt Mossberg’s review of four portable Bluetooth keyboards for the iPad 2 at All Things D and was intrigued–especially by the ZaggFolio, which cleverly builds a truly notebook-like keyboard into an attractive case. So I bought one. The ZaggFolio changed the way I use my iPad, and that changed my life.

Without the ZaggFolio, I used the iPad mostly for reading and light productivity. I’d happily type brief e-mails on it, but never anything as long as a meaty blog post or article. But Zagg’s no-compromise keyboard made typing every bit as comfy as it is on a notebook. All of a sudden I could write hundreds of words on the iPad. Or thousands of them.

(Side note: The ZaggFolio I bought was part of an early production run that was defective–its clasp didn’t shut securely. And after a few weeks, one of its keys fell off. I ended up replacing it with the “Logitech Keyboard Case by Zagg for iPad 2,” which puts a similar keyboard in a low-profile tray that doubles as a protector for the iPad 2′s screen. I prefer both of these models to rivals such as the Adonit Writer which don’t match the full-sized, full-travel goodness of Zagg’s designs.)

Blogsy, my go-to iPad blogging app.

Of course, having a nice keyboard for an iPad doesn’t instantly turn it into a pleasing laptop replacement. You’re typing into a radically different set of apps than are available on a notebook. Once I got the ZaggFolio, I had to figure out how to blog, edit photos, and perform other tasks I do every day.

I was just getting started with this challenge when I hopped on a plane to fly to Berlin, where I was attending the IFA electronics show. I took my iPad 2, the ZaggFolio, and my MacBook Air. It was during this trip that the iPad became my primary computing device, even though I was still learning how to be productive with it.
And it was one specific thing about the iPad that made it so useful on the trip: I could use it for ten hours at a pop without worrying about plugging it in.

I can’t overemphasize how important this is to my particular workdays. Even when I’m not traveling, I spend a lot of time bopping around San Francisco and the Bay Area, attending conferences, visiting tech companies, working out of hotel lobbies, and generally having spotty access to power outlets. With the Air, or almost any other portable computer I’ve ever used, I’m lucky to get three or four hours of life out of a charge, and therefore have to bring my power brick and obsess about plugging in whenever possible. It’s an enormous hassle, and sometimes I simply run out of juice.

With the iPad, I didn’t even bother to bring the power adapter to the IFA show: I worked all day, going online as much as I wanted, without fully draining the battery. I ended up only using the MacBook Air in my hotel room.

Beyond the jaw-droppingly good battery life, my iPad 2 has one other hardware attribute that’s a huge upgrade over the Air: It has AT&T wireless broadband built in. There are PCs with embedded wireless, of course, but not Macs. And even though I’ve used both the Air and iPads with Mi-Fi mobile routers in the past, I like the built-in wireless on my particular iPad much, much better than any external connectivity solution. I don’t have to worry about toting another device (or draining my phone’s battery, as I would if I tethered it to the iPad). I don’t have to futz with Wi-Fi hotspots. I’m just online–and it makes me so much more productive that I don’t object a bit to paying AT&T for the service. (I even happily forked over a stiff fee for international roaming in Berlin and during a later trip I took to Tokyo.)

Okay: The Zagg keyboards are good. The iPad’s battery life is good. Its built-in broadband is good. I quickly discovered yet another simple joy of using the iPad as a blogging/writing tool: Its utter predictability and simplicity.

When you use a Windows PC–and, to a somewhat lesser extent, a Mac–you get dragged down by the responsibilities and obligations of using a computer. Even if you’re very familiar with a program, you need to bob and weave your way around icons and menu items you don’t require at the moment to get to the ones you do need. Programs other than the one you’re using may vie for your attention, possibly alerting you, for instance, that they need to be updated. You might have to rummage around in folders to find documents. When you multitask between apps, you need to juggle their windows, maximizing or minimizing them as you go. If a program stalls, you’ll likely need to kill it manually.

With the iPad, all that goes away. You can devote nearly every second of your time to the task at hand, rather than babysitting a balky computer. I don’t feel like I’m “using an iPad to write.” I’m just writing. It’s a far more tranquil, focused experience than using a PC or Mac. It’s also easier to dive in, do a bit of work as time allows, then dive out–especially since the iPad’s instant-on feature is more reliably instant than the alleged instant-on capabilities of traditional computers.

TouchDraw, a powerful iPad drawing app. (I didn’t draw the hourglass in it–I imported it, and composited it with text.)

Those facts helps make up for one of the challenges of using the iPad for productivity: Many tasks are at least a bit slower or more unwieldy than with a computer, and some things that can be done with one program on a Windows PC or a Mac require several of them on the iPad. When I started using the iPad as my primary device, for example, I thought that Photoshop would be simply irreplaceable. Then I discovered that I could do about 85% of the things I do with Photoshop by using several iPad apps together as an ad-hoc graphics suite, including PhotoForge2, TouchDraw, and others. Photoshop remains the more powerful tool, and on the iPad, I only have access to the fonts that Apple provides. But I can apply fancy effects, layer together multiple images into a collage, and dress up type on the iPad.

(Wait, how can you match the precision of a mouse and the efficiency of a big-screen display with the iPad’s touch interface and dinky screen? Well…you can’t. But for most of my day-to-day needs I can come closer than I would have expected before I gave it a shot.)

As for writing and editing, I usually use Apple’s own Pages when I’m creating a manuscript that someone is going to expect to get as a Word document, such as stories for TIME’s dead-tree version. Pages has maybe five percent of the features of Microsoft Word, and for the type of writing I usually do…that’s a virtue! It makes it easier to concentrate: All I really need is a white screen and a word count. (I would like Find/Replace, though.) [UPDATE: Search and replace is there--it's just a bit hidden, and I didn't see it. One less reason to be hesitant about the iPad.]

When I’m blogging at Technologizer, I use an excellent app called Blogsy, which I prefer to the official WordPress app for iOS. (I’d be even happier if I could just use full-blown WordPress in Safari, but it doesn’t quite work.) For CNET blog posts, I use CNET’s proprietary content-management system, which runs reasonably well in Safari.

Other iPad productivity tools I use every day include the splendid mobile-browser version of Gmail and the iOS versions of the IMO.IM instant messenger and HootSuite Twitter client. I use other apps from time to time and am frequently discovering new ones; most iPad apps cost only a few dollars, so you can explore the wonders of the App Store without blowing much money.

It’s true that there are things that don’t work very well on the iPad. (One of them, inexplicably, is Google+–its iOS app is dreadful, and I have trouble with both the mobile-browser and desktop-browser versions.) There are also a few things I don’t do at all on the tablet, such as manage my WordPress installation. (For that, I run Apache, MySQL, and PHP on the MacBook Air.) But I can get most of the jobs I tackle in a normal day done–and the longer I do this, the more efficient I get at it.
At first, when I traveled out of town, I’d bring the iPad and the MacBook Air but use the iPad most of the time. Now I’ve started bringing only the iPad, unless I have
specific reason to think I’ll need a full-blown computer. When I went to Chicago on a business trip last month equipped only with the tablet, it was the first time in two decades that I’d boarded an airplane for work purposes without a laptop on hand.

So would I recommend that everyone ditch their computers in favor of iPads? No, not at all.

All of this works wonderfully well for me, but that’s because of my particular circumstances: It lets me work anywhere and everywhere, without having to think about my battery or remember to bring along much in the way of cables and accessories. (I do usually tote my iPad in a little bag that has room for Apple’s SD card adapter for transferring photos from a digital camera, although I’m just as likely to shoot photos with my iPhone and e-mail them to the iPad.) Even with the added bulk of a Zagg keyboard, the iPad is the smoothest, least cumbersome mobile computing device I’ve ever used, and I rarely leave the house without it.

PhotoForge2, a neat iPad photo editor with a clever interface.

When I’m at home, however, I’m less concerned with power management and portability. Oftentimes, I use my MacBook Air instead of the iPad. But not always–really, unless I have a specific need for a Mac app, I generally grab whatever’s handiest, and don’t give it much thought.

I know I’m still unusual. When I’m out and about and run into my fellow bloggers–most of who have workdays at least roughly similar to mine–they’re intrigued by my iPad-and-Zagg set-up. They ask questions. But I don’t think I’ve convinced any of them to join me. Yet.

Still, I don’t think I’m a wacko. What I’m doing is a viable option today, and it’s only going to get more appealing as tablet apps get more mature. (I’ve seen noticeable improvement to programs such as Blogsy in just the 90 days I’ve been doing this.)

Based on my first three months as a mostly-iPad person, I’m convinced that I’ve arrived in the future of computing–or a rough approximation thereof–a little ahead of schedule. I’m glad I’m here, and I bet I have lots and lots of company soon enough.

Source:http://technologizer.com/2011/12/05/how-the-ipad-2-became-my-favorite-computer/

Nvidia Talks $299 Tegra 3 Tablets and the Challenge of Competing Against the iPad

November 21st, 2011

Toppling the iPad has proved more difficult than some manufacturers might have anticipated. Is it because the iPad is a superior tablet to everything else that’s available? Some would argue that’s precisely why Apple’s magical slate is able to conjure up so many sales, but as far as Nvidia is concerned, there are other factors that give the iPad a distinct advantage.

While speaking to the press in New York on Friday, Jen-Hsun Huang, the often outspoken CEO of Nvidia, said the iPad’s main advantage is that Apple can sell the device through its own store instead of having to lean on retailers like Best Buy, The Wall Street Journal reports.

“Everything sold through Best Buy has to pay Best Buy a margin,” Huang explained.

As far as Huang is concerned, everything else is secondary and more easily solved, like creating a better usability experience, craftsmanship, and cost. On that latter point, Amazon (Kindle Fire) and Barnes & Noble (Nook Tablet) seem to have it solved, though both ended up cutting corners in the features department and are leaning heavily on their own content platforms in order offer a lower cost slate.

With regards to future tablets, Huang talked up its recently introduced Tegra 3 platform and said it will show up in $299 tablets within the next couple of quarters. He didn’t say whether those would be full size (9.7-inch) tablets or 7-inch slates like the Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet, but either way, a $299 Tegra 3 slate sounds rad, doesn’t it?

Source:http://hothardware.com/News/Nvidia-Talks-299-Tegra-3-Tablets-and-the-Challenge-of-Competing-Against-the-iPad/

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes