Posts Tagged ‘Hadware’

Dell executive sees good corporate PC demand

October 5th, 2010

Dell is seeing good demand for new personal computers in offices, driven by the popularity of Microsoft’s Windows 7 software, the head of Dell’s large enterprise business told Reuters on Monday.

Steve Schuckenbrock said technology demand more generally was quite strong in Europe, despite Dell having to fight a large installed base that bigger rival Hewlett-Packard acquired when it bought Compaq for USD 25 billion in 2002.

“EMEA is the battleground,” Schuckenbrock said in an interview in London after the company’s main annual European customer meeting in Berlin.

He said Dell had only about 22 or 23% of the key x86 computer-server market in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region, compared with more than 40% in the United States, and was adding salespeople to help boost that share.

Schuckenbrock said demand for PCs: Dell’s bread and butter was strong, even though many analysts have recently cut their PC forecasts, fearing the incursion of new types of devices like Apple’s iPad.

“The refresh is well under way,” he said, referring to the periodic replacement of aging equipment by companies that is often spurred by major new software releases, but which has been delayed this time around by the recession.

“The demand environment is actually pretty good,” Schuckenbrock said, adding that he estimated about 15% of the commercial installed base had migrated to Windows 7.

Schuckenbrock said technology demand in Europe and the United States was healthy, even though IT chiefs who wanted to invest in new technology often had to find the funds themselves by cutting costs.

“Generally, it’s relatively positive in terms of technology demand in Europe, and I heard that last week from the customers,” he said. “The same agenda is happening in the US”

Large technology vendors like Dell, HP, IBM and Cisco are pushing to diversify out of relatively low-margin businesses like hardware and become one stop shops for their clients’ technology needs many by acquisitions.

Schuckenbrock told Reuters last month that Dell planned more acquisitions after losing to Hewlett-Packard in a bidding war for data-storage company 3PAR, with targets including, but not limited to storage.

On Monday, he said Dell wanted to exploit the freedom of its lack of legacy IT services to get involved in new, virtual ways of working — possibly by buying young companies.

“We’re not interested in buying yesterday’s networking capability,” he said.

Asked to comment on HP’s appointment of ex-SAP Chief Executive Leo Apotheker as its new chief executive to replace Mark Hurd, Schuckenbrock said he welcomed the fact that Apotheker would have to take a hard look at the business.

“The culture needs a lift, the innovation agenda needs a lift, and it won’t be solved purely through acquisition,” he said. “I think they’re going to have their hands full for a while… While they’re figuring that out, we can keep going.”

Source:http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/dell-executive-sees-good-corporate-pc-demand_488837.html

Apple iphone 4 hardware flaw causes public relations backlash

July 14th, 2010

It has been a rough week for Apple as reports from Engadget and Consumer Reports have confirmed recent customer complaints that there is a hardware flaw in the new iPhone 4. In addition, the company is taking heat over censoring their support forums by deleting posts that mentioned the Consumer Reports review.

Instead of tackling this issue head on, Apple has avoided the matter of whether an iPhone 4 hardware problem exists and instead focused on blaming a software glitch. If Apple would have addressed the hardware flaw from the start, the public relations problem would have begun to disperse by now. By avoiding the issue, Apple has opened the door for numerous m

Source:-http://www.b2cmarketinginsider.com/public-relations/apple%E2%80%99s-iphone-4-hardware-flaw-causes-public-relations-backlash-0952

US army’s consolidated buy for computer hardware

June 21st, 2010

The US Army in the 21st century is an army on the computer and the network. Whether in a Kabul command post, on a Kandahar patrol, or at a Pentagon desk, the Army relies on desktop and laptop computers to stay connected and access intelligence.

Army laptops and desktops are made by the same companies that supply computers in the commercial marketplace: HP, Dell, Apple, Samsung, and others. To get the best deal on COTS computers, in 2005 the Army instituted the consolidated buy (CB) program, which enables Army customers to get laptops, desktops, and other computer equipment at bulk prices, even if they only purchase one at a time.

The program is intended to save the Army money and ensure that computers purchased comply with Army IT technical and security standards. The Army estimates that its CB program has saved it millions of dollars on purchases of computer equipment since 2005.

Source:http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/us-army-computer-hardware-purchasing-06433/

NVIDIA breaks up with hardware secrets

May 28th, 2010

From time to time some manufacturer breaks the relationship they have with us. Usually this happens because we stand firm defending unbiased reviews and refuse to take down negative reviews and give the manufacturer the privilege of reading a review before it is posted.

This time we have NVIDIA blacklisting us. After we published a review – without any support from them, N.B. – they complained that we didn’t talk about CUDA or PhysX. I replied saying that we weren’t going to talk about these subjects because we thought they were not relevant to the average user, and we usually don’t re-write reviews. I think this is funny, we have to make a lot of effort to get samples because NVIDIA doesn’t help us and then when we publish the review they complain? If they had given us any kind of support or talked to us clarifying why they think commenting these features would make any real sense to the average user we wouldn’t be so frustrated. But all the reasons they gave us were manufactured by their propaganda machine.

After this e-mail exchange they simply put us in their black list and thus we stopped being invited to their latest product presentations, we were dropped from the list of websites that get products before the release date and we stop getting any kind of support from them. Any e-mail I sent to NVIDIA asking for anything is completely ignored.

They must think that we are a small entity, forgetting that I am also the editor-in-chief of Clube do Hardware, the largest website about computers in Brazil, with 20 million pageviews and 7.5 million visitors per month – yes, this website is bigger than most North-American reviewing websites (all reviews posted on Hardware Secrets are also posted on Clube do Hardware).

I am posting this to explain why we didn’t cover the Fermi architecture launch (we weren’t invited for the presentation) nor reviewed any of their DirectX 11 video cards (they didn’t send any samples even after we requested samples a few times). This also explains why we are reviewing more AMD/ATI-based products and why our video section is kind of slow.

Curiously from what I read on other websites, it seems that AMD/ATI was able to regain a lot of market share because it seems Fermi architecture didn’t live up to the expectations.

So apparently NVIDIA’s philosophy is “is you don’t say what we want you to say, we won’t support you anymore”. It is amazing how some manufacturers try to control what the media publish about them and try to brainwash journalists. Unfortunately there are some publications that accept this sort of thing. We will always be on the side of unbiased journalism. If a manufacturer restricts us from what we can or cannot talk, we prefer not to work with this manufacturer anymore. The press must be free.

This Monday NVIDIA will announce GeForce GTX 465. Since I didn’t sign any NDA and since I am not getting any kind of support anyway, here are the basic specs: 352 processors, 44 texture units, 607 MHz core clock, 1,215 MHz shader clock and 802 MHz (2,206 MHz QDR) memory clock. The card will have 1 GB GDDR5 memory with a 256-bit interface.

Obviously we won’t publish a review of this card on the launch date, since NVIDIA blacklisted us.

So if you have any complaints on why we haven’t reviewed video card “A” or “B” from NVIDIA, please complain with NVIDIA and not with us

Source:-http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/blog/NVIDIA-breaks-up-with-Hardware-Secrets/174

Computer hardware are evolving so fast

May 28th, 2010

Computer hardware are evolving so fast these days, you could go to sleep for a second and wake up obsolete. You might want to keep abreast of these advancements as they come; you might want to surf the web and learn every once in a while. With a light pen, you can touch a computer screen and write into the system practically like you are writing on paper. But that is so yesterday. Today they have voice recognition software that come with their own hardware. Speak and your words get typed out into the system. But even that is old news now; you might want to update your computer hardware background. The reason computer hardware remain a story to tell after so long is that they so continue to evolve. What you dropped your jaw over yesterday can easily have been topped already today. You just cannot know it all. What is worth doing at all is worth doing well. Getting computer hardware is not too difficult, but it is only easy when you know what you are looking for. You need to know a little something about them, or your attempt at building a system would be futile.

Source:http://www.mypantrypro.com/?p=668

Free Online Resources Justify Government’s ICT cuts

May 25th, 2010

The British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta) was established in 1998 with the objective of guiding the strategic direction and development of national education policy to best take advantage of technology. In its capacity, it oversees the procurement of all ICT equipment and e-learning strategy for schools.

The agency was part of the Labour’s government’s plans to bridge the “digital divide” by ensuring all children have access to a computer in their home. Becta encouraged secondary schools to employ virtual learning environments so parents could monitor their child’s progress in the classroom. It also sought to arrange framework agreements to ensure reasonable prices for ICT in the classroom and among other things, provided laptops and broadband to over 200,000 of Britain’s poorest children.
While Becta’s lofty ambitions of integrating ICT into every classroom in the UK are commendable, things rarely matched their original plans in reality.

The agency was originally mandated to make ICT more assessable to the tech-naïve teacher by procuring hardware and infrastructure from suppliers. Arrangements were made between Becta and IT suppliers which left little in the way of input from schools. With so little say in the decision making process, all too often schools were left frustrated by inadequate technology not fit for its purpose. The inability to source the required technology was confirmed recently when Becta admitted that only one school in five knew how to effectively utilise their new technology.

A further complaint over the agency was that their building schemes were so inflexible that the technology was out of date by the time schools opened. For example, often times prearranged contracts between Becta and IT suppliers meant hefty fees had to be paid to IT suppliers if even the most basic of new software was to be installed. These exorbitant fees resulted in reluctance to update software which forced the technology to become antiquated very quickly.

As technology evolves at a lightning quick pace, downloading the latest free software would have allowed schools to keep their systems up to date. Instead large sums of money were profligately used to upgrade systems. Becta also sourced expensive versions of the latest e-learning software to create enhanced learning outcomes in the classroom. However this proved to be ineffective and an inefficient waste of funds as the majority of users were unable to utilise the e-learning software.

Today there is a multitude of free high quality open source software on the web which achieves the same objective as the expensive software Becta procured. One website which provides free online training courses is ALISON.com

ALISON recently forged strategic partnerships with both the British Council and the Irish Health Safety Authority and will soon pass the 500,000 in terms of registered learners.

The website offers free interactive self-paced training courses and certification in a wide variety of topics including ICT, Health & Safety and Schools Curriculum. The resources are ideal for students and teachers alike and as government funding in elearning programmes in schools is axed, ALISON offer an ideal substitute.

Source:http://www.trainingpressreleases.com/newsstory.asp?NewsID=5433

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes