Posts Tagged ‘Chrome’

When hacking Chrome, it’s all about your data

August 5th, 2011

Google touts the Chrome OS as being free from traditional security concerns like malware, but it’s still vulnerable to entirely different kinds of attacks, two researchers from the firm WhiteHat Security told Black Hat attendees here today.

The Chrome OS is unlike any other desktop system currently available, said Matt Johansen, WhiteHat Security’s team lead. “It’s more similar to mobile devices and apps, where to get more out of the device you’re going to need to install extensions,” he said. “Mobile bugs are being sold for 20 to 30 percent more than desktop bugs because if you own somebody’s phone you own their life.”

Source:http://news.cnet.com/8300-5_3-0.html?categoryId=10451288

Chrome overtakes Firefox as UK’s second most popular web browser

August 1st, 2011

Chrome has overtaken Firefox to become browser number 2 in the UK, thanks to an extensive advertising campaign.

According to web metrics firm Statcounter, Chrome has seen its share of the web browser market rise to 22%, marginally ahead of rival Firefox.

Internet Explorer still dominates the top of the list with 45% market share, though it has been losing ground to competitors at a steady rate despite being pre-installed on the majority of PCs in Britain. Apple Safari rounds off the last of the major browsers, coming in 4th with 9% market share.

While an aggressive advertising campaign saw Chrome as the first Google product to be advertised on British television, much of its popularity can be attributed to its speed according to Chrome Engineer Lars Bak.

“Speed is a fundamental part of it, but it’s also about the minimal design and the way it handles security. If you as a user try [loading] a webpage and it feels snappy, it’s really hard to go back. It has shown that people spend more time interacting with the web,” concludes Bak.

Source:http://mybroadband.co.za/news/quick-news/30616-chrome-overtakes-firefox-as-uk%E2%80%99s-second-most-popular-web-browser.html

Google adds download defense to Chrome, patches 15 bugs

June 8th, 2011

Google on Tuesday updated Chrome to version 12, adding a new tool that warns users when they’ve downloaded files from dangerous Web sites.

The company also patched 15 bugs in the browser and paid out nearly $10,000 in bounties to outside researchers who reported vulnerabilities to its security team.

Chrome displays this warning if a downloaded file is served from a known malware distribution site.

New to Chrome 12 is a feature that flags dodgy files pulled from the Web. Chrome now shows an alert when users download some file types from sites that are on the Safe Browsing API (application programming interface) blacklist, which Google maintains.

The messages reads: “This file is malicious. Are you sure you want to continue?”

If they wish, users can ignore the warning and save the file to their system’s hard drive.

“This warning will be displayed for any download URL that matches the latest list of malicious websites published by the Safe Browsing API,” said Google last April when it debuted the feature in an earlier edition of Chrome.

Safe Browsing already identifies suspicious or unsafe sites, then adds them to a blacklist. Chrome, Mozilla’s Firefox and Apple’s Safari all tap into Safe Browsing to warn users of risky sites before they actually visit them.

But by expanding its use of Safe Browsing to signal users of not just malicious sites, but also the downloads that come from them, Google is following in Microsoft’s footsteps.

Internet Explorer 9 (IE9), which launched in mid-March, uses something Microsoft calls “SmartScreen Application Reputation” to rank the probability that a download is legitimate software. Files that don’t appear legit trigger a warning if users try to run or save them after downloading.

The new tools within IE9 and Chrome have been applauded by security researchers because hackers don’t always rely on exploits to plant malware on machines. They are often able to trick uses into doing their work for them.

Fake antivirus software, called “scareware,” is a good example. Malicious sites make visitors believe their PCs are infected, and then pitch them worthless security software that can supposedly clean their computer.

Some Mac users got a first hand look at scareware last month when an experienced gang that had worked the Windows side of the street kicked off an aggressive campaign to also sell fake Mac antivirus software.

Other improvements in Chrome 12 include additional support for hardware-accelerated 3-D graphics in Windows Vista, Windows 7 and Mac’s Snow Leopard.

It also supports Adobe Flash’s new settings that let users decide if they want sites to track them with Flash cookies, also called “Local Stored Objects”

Users can now delete Flash cookies when they clear other browser data by checking an option in Chrome’s preferences panel. (The new setting is in the “Under the Hood” section of the panel; to clear LOBs, click the “Clear Browser Data” button beside the Privacy label, and check the “Delete cookies and other site and plug-in data” box.)
IE9 and Firefox already support the LOB-deletion changes to Flash 10.3, but Apple Safari users will have to wait until next month, when Safari 5.1 ships with Mac OS X 10.7, aka Lion.
Tuesday’s update also fixed 15 vulnerabilities in Chrome. Six were rated “high,” the second-most-severe ranking in Google’s threat system; six were ranked “medium”; and three were tagged as “low.”
None of the vulnerabilities was pegged as “critical,” the category reserved for bugs that may let an attacker escape Chrome’s anti-exploit sandbox. Google has patched several critical bugs this year, including two in April.
Four of the 15 vulnerabilities were identified as “use-after-free” bugs, a type of memory management flaw that can be exploited to inject attack code, while two others were labeled “same origin bypass” vulnerabilities. Those bugs could be used to steal sensitive information contained in legitimate sites open in the browser by tricking users into visiting malicious URLs at the same time.
As it always does, Google locked the Chrome bug-tracking database to prevent outsiders from reading up on the patched vulnerabilities. The company bars the public from the database to give users time to update, sometimes waiting months before removing the blocks.
For example, none of the descriptions for the 27 bugs Google patched in late April can yet be accessed by the public.
The company paid out $9,870 in bounties to five researchers who reported eight of the vulnerabilities, including $4,633 to frequent contributor Sergey Glazunov. Another researcher identified only as “miaubiz,” took home $3,000 for his or her efforts.
Glazunov was awarded Google’s top-money bounty of $3,133 for finding a bug that when accompanied by several lesser vulnerabilities ended up classified by Google as “critical impact.”
In January, Glazunov became the first outside researcher to win Google’s biggest bounty. So far this year, Google has spent more than $88,000 on bug bounties.
Of the major browser makers, only Google and Mozilla pay bounties to independent security researchers.
Chrome 12 can be downloaded for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux from Google’s Web site. Users already running the browser will be updated automatically.

Source:http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217427/Google_adds_download_defense_to_Chrome_patches_15_bugs

Chrome OS Will Likely Include Netflix Support

May 10th, 2011

Now that the Google I/O conference for developers is just a day away, speculation as to what will be revealed in San Francisco this week is reaching a fever pitch.

Details on the next Android release–to be called Ice Cream Sandwich, I’ve heard–seems a likely bet, as does at least a glimpse at some of the first commercially available hardware to be running Google’s Chrome OS.

If indeed such hardware does debut, there’s a good chance we’ll see some exciting new features in Chrome OS. A file explorer and VPN support were recently added, but of particular note to anyone who has tested out the Linux-based operating system so far is that–according to some recent reports–Netflix support will probably be included.

An Official Netflix Plug-in

Linux users have long lamented the lack of Netflix support for the free and open source operating system, and Chrome OS has thus far suffered the same shortcoming. Requests for that feature, in fact, are common on forums for users of Google’s experimental CR-48 Chrome OS-powered notebook computer.

Now, however, several reports are suggesting that official Netflix support is on the way to Chrome OS via a Netflix plug-in.

Included in a recent Chrome OS code review, in fact, is a line reading, “Update netflix version in chromeos plugin check,” as Chrome Story pointed out on Saturday.

“This plugin check is included in all devices including Alex, but not on CR48 ( Was that a step to keep that from leaking ?),” the site reported. “This plugin is now part of the few included in Chrome OS, PDF, Google Talk plugin etc.”

Early Indications

Reports from as early as February suggest that Netflix has been working on Chrome OS support for some time.

“Dear Chrome Pilot User: Streaming is not currently supported on your device,” read a letter that was reportedly sent from Netflix to early testers of the operating system. “We’re working with Google to ensure that Chrome Notebook users can instantly watch TV shows and movies from Netflix. More details will be announced in the coming months.”

So, it’s looking pretty likely that Netflix support really is on the way. This can only come as music to the ears of current and future users of Google’s open source operating system. For Linux users, meanwhile, it could provide a long-awaited way to enjoy Netflix at last.

Source:http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/227430/chrome_os_will_likely_include_netflix_support.html

Android, Chrome OS, and Ubuntu United in One Platform

April 28th, 2011

With so many exciting new operating systems to choose from today, it can be tough to settle on just one–particularly if you’re an open source fan.

Recently, however, Always Innovating has created an option that allows users to avoid choosing altogether. A new platform demonstrated recently by the company on YouTube (video below) combines Canonical’s Ubuntu and Google’s Android and Chrome OS with its own, custom Linux-based operating system to offer a quad-boot alternative.

Yes, that’s four operating systems in one, downloadable for free from Always Innovating’s site in just 2.04GB.

Four OSes in One

Dubbed Super-Jumbo, the new offering was designed for the Beagle Board, a high-performance, low-power and open source computer produced by a community including Texas Instruments and distributed by Digi-Key. Priced at $149, the Beagle Board is a fanless, single-board computer based on TI’s OMAP3530 system-on-a-chip, which in turn uses the ARM Cortex-A8 core.

Also compatible with Always Innovating’s own Touch Book and Smart Book hardware, Super-Jumbo is a single image that provides four operating systems fully optimized for the third-generation OMAP chip: Google’s Android 2.3, or Gingerbread; Ubuntu Linux 10.10, or Maverick Meerkat; Chrome OS; and Always Innovating’s own AIOS, which is a fork of the Ångström Linux distribution built for embedded devices.

The platform represents the first time Chrome OS has ever been released for the OMAP3 generation of processors, the company says.

No Rebooting Necessary

Users of Super-Jumbo–which is bundled with hundreds of applications, Always Innovating says–can run the four operating systems concurrently and then switch among them without rebooting or incurring any performance loss. Each can also be set to load by default.

Can more choice and flexibility ever be a bad thing, particularly when it’s all Linux-based, free and (mostly) open? I certainly don’t think so. Below is the video demonstrating Super-Jumbo in action. Time to take it for a test drive.

Source:http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/226435/android_chrome_os_and_ubuntu_united_in_one_platform.html

Google to give away Chrome OS Notebooks for $10-$20/Month subscription?

April 27th, 2011

If the recent rumors are true, you’ll soon be able to get a Chrome OS notebook as a subscription from Google for $10-$20 a month.

According to a report from Neowin , the new Google notebook (probably similar to the Cr-48 test notebook) will be available in late June/early July with this subscription model, which will also include hardware refreshes and repairs. So you’ll always have an up-to-date laptop, albeit one that’s more browser than mean machine.

When my PCWorld colleague Edward N. Albro first looked at the Cr-48, Google’s prototype Chrome OS computer, he found it “little more than a browser in a box” (even though it can be hacked to run Mac OS X and Windows). Because of this, a decision by Google to give the hardware away and just charge a monthly fee makes great sense.

The Cr-48 drew mixed initial impressions all around, but it was only a beta preview for testers and the next iteration of the Google notebook could overcome the pilot notebook’s shortcomings (lack of a caps-lock key, for example), while keeping its nice features (such as fast boot and resume times and over 8 hours of battery life). PCWorld blogger Jared Newman reported last month that Google confirmed on Twitter that Chrome OS notebooks would be coming mid-year. This jives with the Summer 2011 Chrome notebooks rumors we’re now hearing.

It’s an interesting concept–a cheap computer you can get for $240 a year–though not really revolutionary (anyone remember PeoplePC and other “free” PCs?). If a subscription plan isn’t for you, Neowin reports that you’ll be able to purchase the Chrome OS notebook in regular one-time payment fashion as well.

Computerworld has rounded up some comments that pretty much summarize my confused thoughts. What do you think? Will you be subscribing to a Google OS notebook?

Source:http://www.pcworld.com/article/225916/google_to_give_away_chrome_os_notebooks_for_1020month_subscription.html

Chrome OS Subscriptions: (Possibly) A Step Forward

April 22nd, 2011

It’s probably no secret that I’m a complete fanboy of Google’s Chrome OS. I went from splitting my time between a desktop and laptop to almost exclusively using my CR48 all the time, as my other machines gather dust. I’ve blogged about my CR48 before (and intend to again), but this is about something different: what could possibly be the future of Chrome OS.

According to The Chrome Source, Google is thinking about releasing Google Chrome OS to the world through contracts, where users pay a monthly fee for subsidized hardware. That’s right, almost exactly what we have in place for our cell phones now. The story references “$10-$20 a month” as a subscription service, and would possibly include some internet (the CR48 comes with a 3G antenna and Verizon service), tech support from Google, updates, and hardware refreshes (!) when Google released them.

These are of course just rumors, but I will admit I was instantly blind with rage. I was on Twitter in seconds, and only the CR48’s lack of a caps lock kept me from screaming my dismay and anger to any and all who would hear. The idea of signing my soul into another 2 year contract made my blood boil. You could buy the hardware outright if you wanted to (much like unsubsidized phones), but the whole thing seemed like a money making ploy by Google to rope in customers, and make them pay for years to come.

Thankfully, some of the calmer, wiser members of my twitter stream responded to my vitriol, and it caused me to sit back and take a breath, and approach this whole thing from another angle: Software as a Service (SaaS)

Google is in a unique position. Chrome OS is Linux, true. But it’s a condensed, speedy little flavor, one that doesn’t require much for system resources and is mostly hidden from the user. The front end is just a browser: there’s no “My Computer” or “Home” analogue (though you can get there if you really want); it’s like having Google’s Chrome browser as the entirety of your computing experience.

The oddest part is that it really works. I’ll admit, it was awkward at first. The CR48 did little to make me settle my unease, with its initially quirky touchpad and odd hotkeys (and no caps lock? How was I going to win the internet?!). But if your day-to-day computing is handled primarily on the internet, you’ll find a wealth of sites that act just like the programs you’re used to, or access applications that run through a browser.

It took some acclimation, but now I feel awkward sitting down at the Windows machine I use at work — an odd transition. For the first time in a long time, I feel like I’m using an operating system that’s easy, intuitive, and just works, will being inexpensive. It’s complicated enough if you want to drill down into the Developers section, but you don’t need to. It’s got something for everyone.

Back to the Software as Service angle: part of the The Chrome Source’s story references Google Music, too. So, what if this 10-20 bucks a month included Music plus maintenance, pay-as-you-go internet, a new laptop to cover hardware refreshes, tight integration with Google’s services, and any maintenance? I’ll tell you what: it’ll sell like hotcakes. For good reason, too: It’s an amazing pitch and everyone wins.

I imagine a world where I pay 20 bucks a month, and never have to worry about my computer being obsolete as soon as I walk out of the store, because I know I’m getting the next iteration of the hardware as soon as it comes out. I imagine Google fights wireless providers and wins me competitive rates for 3G service on the laptop in my area, so that I can finally put an end to my reliance on home-based internet. I imagine a world where I can hit a web-based store for applications, and not worry about whether it’s in stock or if it’ll work with my chosen OS.

Obviously, this won’t be everyone’s solution. Your mileage may vary, but I am happy with a cloud-based life online, and I’ve owned powerhouse gaming rigs, dumb terminals, and everything in between. It’s just what I’m ready for. Can Google provide this? After failing so miserably with the lofty ideas behind the Nexus One, I have concerns, but I for one am ready to hail our new, internet-based overlords.

Source:http://www.pcworld.com/article/225890/chrome_os_subscriptions_possibly_a_step_forward.html

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes