Posts Tagged ‘chip’

New Chip Challenges Traditional Thinking

May 22nd, 2012

Researchers have unveiled an “inexact” computer chip that challenges the industry’s dogmatic 50-year pursuit of accuracy. The design improves power and resource efficiency by allowing for occasional errors.

Prototypes unveiled recently at the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers in Cagliari, Italy, are at least 15 times more efficient than today’s technology. The research, which earned best-paper honors at the conference, was conducted by experts from Rice University in Houston, Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Switzerland’s Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM) and the University of California, Berkeley.

This comparison shows frames produced with video-processing software on traditional processing elements (left), inexact processing hardware with a relative error of 0.54 percent (middle) and with a relative error of 7.58 percent (right). The inexact chips are smaller, faster and consume less energy. The chip that produced the frame with the most errors (right) is about 15 times more efficient in terms of speed, space and energy than the chip that produced the pristine image (left). Image courtesy: Rice University/CSEM/NTU.

“It is exciting to see this technology in a working chip that we can measure and validate for the first time,” said project leader Krishna Palem, who also serves as director of the Rice-NTU Institute for Sustainable and Applied Infodynamics (ISAID). “Our work since 2003 showed that significant gains were possible, and I am delighted that these working chips have met and even exceeded our expectations.”

ISAID is working in partnership with CSEM to create new technology that will allow next-generation inexact microchips to use a fraction of the electricity of today’s microprocessors. “The paper received the highest peer-review evaluation of all the Computing Frontiers submissions this year,” said Paolo Faraboschi, the program co-chair of the ACM Computing Frontiers conference and a distinguished technologist at Hewlett-Packard Laboratories. “Research on approximate computation matches the forward-looking charter of Computing Frontiers well, and this work opens the door to interesting energy-efficiency opportunities of using inexact hardware together with traditional processing elements.”

The concept is deceptively simple: Slash power use by allowing processing components — like hardware for adding and multiplying numbers — to make a few mistakes. By cleverly managing the probability of errors and limiting which calculations produce errors, the designers have found they can simultaneously cut energy demands and dramatically boost performance. One example of the inexact design approach is “pruning,” or trimming away some of the rarely used portions of digital circuits on a microchip. Another innovation, “confined voltage scaling,” trades some performance gains by taking advantage of improvements in processing speed to further cut power demands.

In their initial simulated tests in 2011 , the researchers showed that pruning some sections of traditionally designed microchips could boost performance in three ways: The pruned chips were twice as fast, used half as much energy and were half the size. In the new study, the team delved deeper and implemented their ideas in the processing elements on a prototype silicon chip. “In the latest tests, we showed that pruning could cut energy demands 3.5 times with chips that deviated from the correct value by an average of 0.25 percent,” said study co-author Avinash Lingamneni, a Rice graduate student.

In terms of speed, energy consumption and size, inexact computer chips, like this prototype, are about 15 times more efficient than today’s microchips. Image courtesy: Avinash Lingamneni/Rice University/CSEM.

“When we factored in size and speed gains, these chips were 7.5 times more efficient than regular chips. Chips that got wrong answers with a larger deviation of about 8 percent were up to 15 times more efficient.” Project co-investigator Christian Enz, who leads the CSEM arm of the collaboration, said, “Particular types of applications can tolerate quite a bit of error. For example, the human eye has a built-in mechanism for error correction. We used inexact adders to process images and found that relative errors up to 0.54 percent were almost indiscernible, and relative errors as high as 7.5 percent still produced discernible images.”

Palem, the Ken and Audrey Kennedy Professor of Computing at Rice, who holds a joint appointment at NTU, said likely initial applications for the pruning technology will be in application-specific processors, such as special-purpose “embedded” microchips like those used in hearing aids, cameras and other electronic devices.

The inexact hardware is also a key component of ISAID’s I-slate educational tablet. The low-cost I-slate is designed for Indian classrooms with no electricity and too few teachers. Officials in India’s Mahabubnagar District announced plans in March to adopt 50,000 I-slates into middle and high school classrooms over the next three years. The hardware and graphic content for the I-slate are being developed in tandem. Pruned chips are expected to cut power requirements in half and allow the I-slate to run on solar power from small panels similar to those used on handheld calculators. Palem said the first I-slates and prototype hearing aids to contain pruned chips are expected by 2013.

Source:http://www.cgw.com/Press-Center/News/2012/New-Chip-Challenges-Traditional-Thinking.aspx

AMD Pitcairn With 768 Shaders: What is This Mystery Chip?

May 4th, 2012

Our colleagues at one of our European labs were handed an early version of an AMD Pitcairn-based Radeon HD 7850. What made this AFOX unit special from the currently existing Radeon HD 7850 reference design that we’ve already peeled apart is that is it a single-slot solution as opposed to one that takes up two of your expansion spaces. Here is what comes up with plugging it into GPU-Z:

A look at the device ID, the clock speeds and memory reveal nothing out of the ordinary. What caught our attention, however, was the number of available shader units. While the Radeon HD 7850 we were expecting comes with 1024 shaders, our sample had only 768 shaders.

This compelled us to dig deeper, so we removed the cooler and the abundant amounts of thermal paste. The board itself was produced by AOLIDA, Jiutan Xinhua Town (Guangdong).

Please keep in mind that this is just an engineering sample, and is not a fair representation of any final shipping product. Any product packing a Radeon HD 7850 GPU will obviously be equipped with 1024 shaders. We’re treating this product as something of a mystery in the Tom’s Hardware labs.

We tried looking into the BIOS to see if it would shed some light on the unexpected number of shaders, but none of our traditional BIOS tools revealed any information. The card identified itself as a Radeon HD 7850 in AMD’s current Catalyst driver suite software, but it was incompatible with the Overdrive overclocking functions.

BIOS limitation, laser-cut or faulty chip?

With a card that identifies itself (somewhat) as a Radeon HD 7850, we were expecting a chip stamped with the batch number 1151, like all of the other HD 7850 and 7870 chips so far, but scrubbing the GPU revealed 1152 ENG as the batch number, further confusing the matter. If it is indeed a different chip, then perhaps it isn’t a case of cut or BIOS-disabled shaders. In fact, even after attempting to flash the reference firmware of an HD 7870 and an HD 7850, the card was both stable and exhibited no change in performance, leading us to assume that it truly only packs 768 shaders.

We’ve brought this issue to AMD only to be referred back to the board partners. AFOX told use that this chip belonged to a batch of GPUs AMD delivered in March 2012 for layout and design purposes. Still, we’re not sure how this 768-shader GPU ended up on the board designated for the HD 7850, pre-production sample or not.

One theory is that AMD is sending out partially defective chips for PCB developers to experiment with instead of throwing them away, but that may go against the logic of having engineers trying to validate on an ‘incomplete’ GPU. Maybe – just maybe – it’s an unannounced Radeon HD 7830 that slipped through the cracks and into our labs.

Our team in Germany will be putting this card through its paces. Stay tuned for that coming next week!

Source:http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Pitcairn-radeon-HD-7850-768-shaders-gpu,15524.html

Intel’s Ivy Bridge Chips Appear to Run Hotter When Overclocked

May 1st, 2012

Intel’s new third-generation Ivy Bridge processors offer a performance boost (especially in the graphics department) with lower power usage, but overclocking these chips to gain even more speed may be a bad idea. Several tests find Ivy Bridge processors to run much hotter than second-generation Sandy Bridge chips when significantly overclocked.

Overclocking, for the uninitiated, refers to running your hardware at a faster speed than the manufacturer intended–so you can squeeze the most performance out of your processor, graphics card, memory, or other computer component. PC enthusiasts push the limits of their hardware by overclocking.

Unfortunately, Intel’s new Ivy Bridge processors may get dangerously hot when pushed too far–as much as 68° F (20° C) hotter than Sandy Bridge processors, according to independent overclocking tests done by AnandTech, Tech Report, and Overclockers.

Pushing an Intel i7-3770K processor over Intel’s peak 3.9GHz rating for this chip to 4.9GHz or above and with the CPU voltage increased as well, the CPU rises to around 212° F (100° C)–which is hot enough to boil water.

This is significantly hotter than the 176° F (80° C) measured for a Sandy Bridge chip running at the same 4.9GHz.

The biggest leaps in temperatures occur when the voltage is ramped up significantly, as this AnandTech chart shows: Going from 1.05 volts to 1.30 volts at 4.4GHz CPU frequency, the temperature rapidly rises from a stable 149° F (65° C) to more than 194° F (90° C).

Why Does Ivy Bridge Run Hotter?

Why should the Ivy Bridge chips, which are more power efficient than Sandy Bridge, run hotter?

PCWorld Senior Editor Jason Cross suggests four possible reasons for these findings. The heat issue also may be a combination of these factors:

Ivy Bridge packs more transistors into a smaller area than Sandy Bridge. That means increased thermal density–heat generated in a given area. It’s harder to cool processors where the heat is concentrated into a small space. Modern CPU chips have a “heat spreader” on top of them. It’s part of the processor package. The Sandy Bridge heat spreader was soldered on, while the Ivy Bridge heat spreader makes contact with the CPU using thermal paste. It may not be conducting heat as well as the Sandy Bridge’s soldered heat spreader. Ivy Bridge usually runs using a lower operating voltage than Sandy Bridge. But to overclock it way up to 4.9GHz, you have to bump up the voltage. In fact you have to add more voltage to an Ivy Bridge processor than a Sandy Bridge processor to reach that level. Since power consumption is strongly related to operating voltage, this means you’re adding more power consumption and heat. Intel’s 22nm manufacturing process is quite new, while the 32nm manufacturing process used with Sandy Bridge is more mature. As the months roll on and Intel improves its 22nm process, leakage and heat dissipation may improve.

The bottom line is that extreme overclocking isn’t recommended for Ivy Bridge systems–take care when increasing the CPU voltage above a few hundred MHz.

Otherwise, you may end up creating more heat than necessary in your laptop or desktop computer, which can shorten the lifespan of your hardware and lead to stability problems.

Source:http://www.pcworld.in/news/intels-ivy-bridge-chips-appear-run-hotter-when-overclocked-69852012

‘Hornet’: A system that simulates 1000 core chip

March 13th, 2012

MIT researchers have developed a software simulation system to evaluate multi-core chip designs more accurately. According to the researchers, the software simulator, dubbed Hornet, that models the performance of multi-core chips and scales up to 1,000 of cores.

At the International Symposium on Networks-on-Chip in 2011, the MIT group won the best-paper prize for their work. The team presents an enhanced version of the simulator in the forthcoming issue of IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems that factors in power consumption as well as patterns of communications between cores, the processing times of individual tasks, and memory-access patterns.

To maintain accuracy of simulation and achieve reasonable run times researchers typically use models of processor cores implemented on programmable chips. To finish in a reasonable time software-only simulations have to sacrifice accuracy and precision.

Hornet sits between the two approaches, according to Myong Hyon Cho, a PhD student in MIT’s department of electrical engineering and computer science (EECS) and one of Hornet’s developers. It is intended to complement the other two approaches.

Although Hornet is slower than some predecessors it can provide cycle-accurate simulation of chips with 1,000 cores. Cycle accuracy is important to catch race and deadlock conditions. Hornet has already proved itself in the simulation of an architecture in which tasks are handed out to cores holding relevant data – rather than moving data to cores running particular tasks. Hornet found a deadlock condition. The researchers also proposed a way to avoid it—and demonstrated that their proposal worked with another Hornet simulation.

Hardware-based simulators cannot be reprogrammed so easily. Hornet could have advantages in situations where “you want to test out several ideas quickly, with good accuracy,” according to Edward Suh, an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at Cornell University, whose group used an early version of Hornet.

However, because Hornet is slower than either hardware-accelerated simulation or less-accurate software simulation it does tend to be used to simulate small parts of an application.

Source:http://www.eetindia.co.in/ART_8800663058_1800003_NT_dc4c27d5.HTM

Intel ‘Ivy Bridge’ desktop chip prices leak

December 20th, 2011

We already have a pretty good idea of what the initial Ivy Bridge lineup is going to look like when Intel releases its next chip refresh in the first half of 2012. Now, the folks at CPU World are spilling the beans on yet another piece of the puzzle: pricing. For the most part it looks like Intel will maintain similar pricing to their current Sandy Bridge products. The Core i7-3770K, for example, will replace the Core i7-2700K at the same $332.

This will be the fastest and most expensive Ivy Bridge part at launch. Three remaining SKUs from the Core i7 family — i7-3770, i7-3770S and i7-3770T — will be priced at $294 in 1K quantities. Further down the ladder the unlocked-multiplier Core i5 3570K is priced at $225 while the i5-3500 and the energy-efficient i5-3570T and i5-3550S models are all priced at $205. Lastly, the Core i5-3450, i5-3450S, and i5-3470T are listed for $184.

Ivy Bridge i5 processors will continue on from Sandy Bridge offering four physical cores, 6MB of L3 cache and no hyper-threading, except for the i5 3470T which is a dual core unit with two hyper-threaded cores. Their Core i7 siblings are also running four physical cores, but can handle eight simultaneous threads and have 2MB more cache available.

Source:http://www.techspot.com/news/46727-intel-ivy-bridge-desktop-chip-prices-leak.html

Alienware Aurora Released, Touts Intel X79 Chip

December 15th, 2011

Alienware has released its new Aurora gaming desktop PC that touts the latest Intel X79 chipset.

The Aurora gaming computer aims to lure fervent gamers on a system jam-packed with the most up-to-date hardware around a factory-overclocked, six-core Intel Core i7-3000 processor.

Arthur Lewis, VP of product management at Alienware, said, “The PC gaming industry continues to grow rapidly, and our customers are demanding systems that can keep up with the most graphic-intensive games on the market.”

Alienware claims that this liquid-cooled system is the most sophisticated gaming desktop available on the market today.

“Alienware Aurora, our most advanced gaming desktop ever, delivers an experience that will exceed the expectations of any serious gamer,” said Lewis.

The gaming PC developer also offers an extensive selection of graphics cards that range from a single 1GB AMD Radeon HD 6870 up to a dual 2GB AMD Radeon HD 6950 with CrossFireX.

Alienware Aurora comes with unlocked BIOS for easier modifications and performance adjustments.

Additional technical specifications include an 8GB or 16GB quad-channel 1600MHz DDR3 RAM, a conventional HDD with 2TB max capacity, and an optional upgrade for a 256GB or 512GB solid-state disk (SSD) drive.

Alienware branding means a hefty price so Aurora costs at least £1,999 (least expensive configuration) as such.

Source:http://socialbarrel.com/alienware-aurora-released-touts-intel-x79-chip/28952/

Blue Chip Module Enables Communications and Tracking in Embedded Systems

December 12th, 2011

Blue Chip Technology release ‘CM1 Board’, a small-footprint plug-in module that enables communications and tracking services.
Hardware developer Blue Chip Technology have announced the general release of their ‘CM1 Board’, a small-footprint plug-in module that enables their acclaimed RE2 single board computer to provide communications and tracking services. The Blue Chip CM1 module can provide an embedded system with GSM/GPRS, Ethernet, GPS and a 3-axis accelerometer. The CM1 module is a plug-in board that further enhances the RE2’s onboard ARM A8 Cortex Wi-Fi (802.11b/g), Bluetooth and 10/100Mbit Ethernet capabilities.
“The CM1 was initially developed for a very demanding vehicle tracking system but is now available for general release,” said Barry Husbands, Managing Director of Blue Chip. “For anyone looking to develop a robust and compact embedded systems that needs good communications and networking, then the RE2 and CM1 combination would be hard to beat at this time.” Blue Chip Technology is one of Europe’s leading designers and manufacturers of industrial and embedded computers.
The company designs and manufactures computer boards for a broad range of industrial sectors such as automotive, public transportation, medical, defence and energy. Blue Chip Technology provides mission critical computer systems to engineering and media projects around the world. The RE2 and CM1 connect via a 20 pin header connector and three mounting holes, providing a robust, low-profile assembly. The CM1 supports 20 channel of GPS satellite positioning and is capable of position resolution accuracy to 2.5m. The onboard 3 Axis accelerometer enables the logging of vehicle behaviour such as acceleration, deceleration and changes of direction.
Additional features include jamming detection, integrated TCP/IP protocol stack and Easy Scan®. “Although, this is now ‘off-the-shelf’ technology, we can also design and manufacture variants for customers who need something a little different or for a bespoke enclosure,” said Barry. “The RE2/CM1 combination also has a powerful graphics capability, for those projects that also require a display.” Software support for the RE2/CM1 includes Embedded Windows and Linux at thistime.
Alternative operating system support can be provided on request. About Blue Chip Technology Ltd Blue Chip Technology Ltd is a European leader in the design and manufacture of industrial and embedded computer systems. Blue Chip Technology serves a wide range of industries, from mission critical systems to the global railway industry to diagnostic test equipment for the automotive sector. It provides a range of standard products such as COM (ETX, XTX and COM Express) and rack mounted PC’s but also manufactures high volumes of customer specific hardware. In addition to its technical capabilities,

Source:http://www.cambridgewireless.co.uk/news/article/default.aspx?objid=41200

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes