Posts Tagged ‘Apple’

TV maker Vizio turns to computers, takes on Apple

May 23rd, 2012

Vizio is no stranger to defying the odds.

Consumers don’t have to wait long to see Vizio launch what could be one of the biggest disruptions to the computer business in years. The Irvine, Calif.-based company, located in an area between Los Angeles and San Diego, down the road from a Christmas tree farm, plans next month to launch a line of computers. It will sell two ulta-thin notebooks, a laptop and two desktop computers that feature high-style design. And leveraging its household name in millions of living rooms, its computers will be designed to be easy to set up and get going right out of the box.

The pitch is simple: Vizio aims to give consumers computers a fit and finish that rivals Apple’s Macintosh, yet running the familiar Microsoft Windows software that powers 90% of the world’s computers. Vizio plans to pull this off with a lineup of stylish computers in carefully machined aluminum bodies carved by robots. And as it did with its flat-screen TVs, it will do so at competitive prices.

“PCs have become a sea of black plastic,” says Vizio Chief Technology Officer Matt McRae, describing the lineup of Windows-based computers from other manufacturers, many of which focus on corporate customers where design is an afterthought. “We’re building a product people want.”

Vizio gets input from suppliers

In the process, Vizio has torn up the playbook on how PCs are designed and marketed. It is pioneering a sort of casual joint venture, which gives makers of parts that go inside the computers great say in how the system is designed.

Vizio is taking the role of a general contractor, overseeing the big-picture but relying on partners for technical help. The computers’ innards are optimized with suggestions from Microsoft and Intel, the companies that know the key components best and spend billions annually on research and development. Vizio has just a few hundred employees, and a small staff of engineers.

“Vizio is doing a good job listening and taking advice from the experiences on how to optimize hardware and software,” says Steve Guggenheimer, vice president of Microsoft’s OEM division, adding that Microsoft is willing to provide technical assistance to any of its partners.

Intel collaborates with all the PC makers that use its chips. But Vizio contacted the computer chipmaker very early in the process and “wanted to learn all we had to teach them,” says Intel’s Gary Richman, director of marketing for the PC client solution division that cooks up innovated designs that use the company’s chips.

That leaves Vizio to focus on the consumer experience, making sure the PC looks and works the way it should, right from the get-go. As evidence of its commitment to consumers over profit, it’s forsaking the industry’s long practice of loading new computers with “crapware” software, which they’re paid to install, but that many times hurt the performance of the computers.

The company also plans to “in source” all the technical support. If consumers call with questions, they will talk to a trained professional at Vizio’s consumer service center in Dakota Dunes, S.D. — not a call center in India or the Philippines.

Plane crash lends perspective
It might be tempting to scoff at Vizio. After all, the privately owned company has just 409 employees. Vizio was co-founded in 2002 by William Wang, now 48, an entrepreneur who created a number of companies, including several computer monitor businesses in the 1990s, among them a company called Princeton Graphics. Later, in 2001, Wang worked with Gateway, a former customer and a popular computer seller in the 1990s, to sell big-screen TVs in the retail stores operated by the computer maker. Wang and 95 others famously survived the crash of a 747 airplane taking off for a flight across the Pacific Ocean. Eighty-three people died in the crash, an experience, he said in an e-mailed response, that has helped him keep the pressure of life in perspective.

“Prior to the crash I worried about business issues every day. The crash allowed me to see the world from a different perspective, eliminating the fear that often limits innovation,” he said in the e-mail. Getting into the PC business is just the latest way Wang hopes to push innovation. “We are entering the PC market because I know consumers want a high-quality and beautifully designed personal computer that is affordable,” he says. “We asked the question, ‘Why can’t we deliver smart industrial design and performance without a price premium?’ ”

But even with its rapid success in TVs, how can it have a chance taking on Hewlett-Packard, Dell and of course Apple, which has grown to become the most valuable U.S. company and is sitting on almost $100 billion in cash and investments?

Making things even more tricky for Vizio is the fact the market for laptops has been stagnant, and as more consumers look to tablets as their go-to devices for e-mail and Web browsing. Vizio also must deal with the fact Apple might encroach on its turf, too. Apple is widely expected to release some sort of TV set, although no details are known.

Vizio is used to taking on difficult tasks, though. When it entered the TV business, the segment was considered to be crowded and mature. But while there were many TVs and TV makers, it turned out that there was a way to do it for less, while maintaining quality.

Consumers’ positive association with Vizio’s TVs and the company’s relationships with big retailers such as Costco and Wal-Mart will certainly give it a fighting chance, says James Kelleher of Argus Research.
Vizio has work cut out for it

There’s no shortage of critics, though. “It’s crazy talk, as far as them competing with Apple,” says James Ragan of Crowell Weedon. Initially, the company might make inroads against Dell and HP in the consumer market, but Vizio still doesn’t have a strong answer to Apple’s iPad tablet computer, which is where the industry’s growth is, he says. “It’s going to be tough for them,” he says.

Not to mention that Apple is successfully locking consumers into a network of devices that starts with them buying a smartphone but branches into other devices and purchases from Apple’s online market for music. Vizio is “not just up against the Apple brand, it’s up against an ecosystem,” says William Choi of Janney Montgomery Scott.

The idea that Vizio could challenge Apple is “ridiculous,” says Andy Hargreaves, analyst at Pacific Crest, who responded to USA TODAY via e-mail. “Unlike the TV market at the time Vizio entered, the PC market is already entirely outsourced and Apple has advantages on component purchasing,” he writes. “Vizio has as much chance as I do in being more cost-efficient than Apple in its production.”

But Vizio’s McRae says the company has heard similar criticism before. Giving consumers what they want, they will be successful. “We have the view of what consumers want,” he says. “We’ve built a different product on an open ecosystem.”

Source:http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/retail/story/2012-05-22/vizio-takes-on-apple-computers/55143066/1

IHS forecasts Apple iOS to dominate tablet market in 2012

May 21st, 2012

According to IHS iSuppli’s worldwide table market tracker report, Apple Inc.’s iOS is expected to regain its commanding leadership of the worldwide tablet space in 2012. The company suffered a temporary dip in market share in the fourth quarter of 2011.

The other finding shared by IHS includes:
After dipping to 55.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2011, according to a final estimate, the Apple operating system’s share of worldwide tablet sales is set to recover to 61 percent for the full year of 2012, about the same portion it had in 2011. The tablet segment includes both media tablets and PC-type tablets.

A surge in sales of Amazon’s Kindle Fire tablet, which is based on Google’s Android operating system, caused the dip in Apple’s media tablet market share in fourth quarter of 2011. This had caused Android’s share of the tablet operating system market to climb to 41.1 percent, up from 31.1 percent during the third quarter of 2011. However, as Apple reasserts its leadership, Android’s share will decline to 38.4 percent for the full year of 2012.

“The key to Apple’s media-tablet success has been its offering of a complete hardware-plus-content ecosystem,” said Rhoda Alexander, director for monitors and tablets research at IHS. “The combination of a good-looking device, well-designed applications, video, books and music has provided consumers with an easy-to-use product and an appealing use case. Such an ecosystem took Apple years to put together, starting with the iPod plus iTunes Music Store more than nine years ago, and it’s proving to be a challenge for the company’s competitors to replicate it.”

Further strengthening Apple’s commanding position in the market, supply-side sources indicate that the company will deploy a smaller, 7.8-inch display version of the iPad later this year, although Apple has yet to confirm this. A smaller screen does not necessarily mean a substantially lower price; rather, IHS expects Apple will place continuing emphasis on the quality of the overall tablet experience and the benefits of selecting the company’s products.

Growth Tablets
Sales of tablets this year-including both media tablets and PC-type tablets-will soar to 126.6 million units, up a remarkable 85 percent from 68.4 million units in 2011. The impressive performance of tablets this year builds on an even mightier 253 percent explosion last year from sales of 19.4 million units in 2010. Tablets comprise one of the strongest categories in the consumer electronics market today, with heady growth in the next few years matching the wild exuberance of the cellphone or mobile handset industry in its initial years of market-busting expansion.

Tablet sales will rise another 63 percent next year, on their way to 360.4 million units by 2016, as shown in the figure below.

Enter the PC Tablet
While media tablets such as the iPad dominate now and throughout the forecast, new ultrabook offerings and the release of Windows 8 later this year will help drive stronger sales in 2013 and beyond of PC-type tablets, IHS predicts. PC tablets will appeal to users wanting the flexibility of a tablet with the versatility of a traditional computer. These devices are able to manage multiple windows and applications including traditional full desktop applications, but can also convert to a slate form with touch capability. The smaller, lighter form of some of the new ultrabook offerings, touch improvements in Windows 8, and more aggressive pricing will help drive growth in this category.

Media tablets are often designated as “consumption-type” products with which users can browse the web, send email, view video, play games or interact with applications.

Within the media tablet space, however, the market is fragmenting into two segments-value products largely serving as “consumption-type” portable media players; and higher-performance units incorporating more complex applications and stronger processors. Much of the growth in the future will come from the value segment, but the performance sector will provide the stronger challenge to traditional PCs in both business and consumer markets.

Overall, the growth last year of media tablets dwarfed that of tablet PCs, and media tablet sales will continue to outperform those of tablet PCs in 2012. By next year, tablet PC growth will accelerate to nearly 160 percent, compared to a still-robust 60 percent increase for media tablets.

The PC tablet growth is a form transition within the larger notebook market and does not reflect any cannibalization of the media tablet opportunity. This is because PC tablets will still lag well behind their media tablet counterparts next year, numbering a little over 8 million units compared to more than 197 million units for media tablets.

Source:http://www.eeherald.com/section/news/nws2012052002.html

Apple Eyeing Retina MacBook Pro?

May 15th, 2012

With Apple’s Worldwide Developer Conference less than a month away, new Mac hardware is expected. Apple is believed to be finalizing an imminent update of its MacBook Pro laptop line, according to two Apple news websites.

One, 9-to-5-Mac, reports that “trusted sources in Apple’s supply chain” claim that a new 15-inch MacBook Pro model with a Retina display, a new Intel Ivy Bridge series chip, and USB 3.0 support has entered production testing.

Apple made its high-resolution Retina Display the primary selling point of its third-generation iPad, launched earlier this year. A Retina Display on a MacBook Pro would certainly appeal to the graphics professionals and media creators who favor Apple’s higher-end hardware.

Another Apple news site, MacRumors, reports finding references to an unreleased MacBook Pro model in data shared with Geek Bench, a computing performance benchmark testing service.

Apple does not comment on unannounced products, but it’s widely believed that Apple had been waiting on the introduction of Intel’s Ivy Bridge chips in late April to revise its hardware.

A report published by Cult of Mac, another Apple news website, indicates that Best Buy has cut Mac prices. Computer retailers commonly do this to clear old inventory when new models are expected.

Apple’s current MacBook Pro line, designated with the model identifier MacBookPro8, was introduced in February 2011 and then updated in October 2011. So a product update in the next month or two would be consistent with Apple’s recent product release pattern.

The MacBook Pro revision is expected to do away with the internal optical drive, a move that would help accelerate the shift toward digital software distribution. As the owner of the highly successful iTunes Store, Apple stands benefit from this transition: more digital downloads mean more software sales fees for Apple.

Like the MacBook Air, the MacBook Pro should support an optional external SuperDrive, since many users still need to be able to access DVDs and CDs on their computers.
Apple might also use its developer conference to launch a new Mac Pro model. Desktop workstations are increasingly regarded as dinosaurs in the mobile era: Most of Apple’s sales in recent quarters have involved mobile iOS devices or portable OS X devices. The fact that Apple last updated its Mac Pro workstation in August 2010 has only heightened concern that the company has lost interest in the professional graphics market.

Source:http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/mac/240000345

$799 MacBook Air: It’s that Apple supply chain again

May 9th, 2012

Apple is rumored to have a $799 MacBook Air in the works and you can thank the company’s supply chain clout should that price come to pass.

According to DigiTimes, Apple is eyeing a $799 MacBook Air in the third quarter. DigiTimes, which has a so-so track record, cites sources in the “upstream supply chain.”

DigiTimes noted that Apple’s move would be designed to close any ultrabook encroachment.

However, it’s more likely that Apple would lower MacBook Air prices because it can at a nice profit margin. Prices of ultrabooks haven’t come down fast enough. The Windows 8 launch may change that equation.

In the end, Apple’s pricing has everything to do with its supply chain. MacBook Air rides with solid-state storage and Apple has those supplies locked up. After all, the iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch use a lot of Flash supply. Meanwhile, Apple can call its shots with screens too.

It’s quite possible that Apple is just passing along some of its savings on the MacBook Air bill of materials. In any case, a less expensive MacBook Air is going to squeeze the ultrabook market.

Source:http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/799-macbook-air-its-that-apple-supply-chain-again/76359

5 Ways The Corporate PC Market Is Evolving

May 4th, 2012

Far from being dead, the personal computer is alive and well. But in many ways – hardware, software, usage patterns – the PC continues to evolve, and nowhere more so than in the enterprise.

Here are five ways that the corporate PC is changing:

“Bring Your Own Computing” is not only a growing trend, but it’s disrupting the balance between user freedom and IT control.
BYOC involves more of managing the workspace than the device. IT will need to find a way to manage the corporate information assets while letting users have the freedom and personalization they want. Microsoft Windows 8 introduces a capability where the PC can be split into two different sides, the user side and the corporate side. This will enable IT to manage the corporate Windows side while enabling the user to have his or her freedom on the personal Windows side. If the user corrupts his or her personal Windows side, it will have no effect on the corporate Windows side.

Mobile devices drive the centralization of apps, files and profiles to the cloud.
Users want common information across all devices including their PC, and the cloud is the natural hub for this information. There first needs to be a mechanism that migrates the user’s existing information to the cloud and then a component that synchronizes application, file and profile information across all the user’s devices. A change to information on one device should be centralized to the cloud and then by synchronized with all the users other devices.

The PC is for work creation and mobile devices are used for review and tactical work.
A smartphone can be used to review short emails and delete ones that are not relevant. With a larger screen, a tablet can be used to review long emails and respond appropriately. Heavy work creation such as spreadsheets, document creation, presentation creation will still be done on a PC.

Desktop virtualization and desktop management will have to become one solution.
The new function will need to be combined to give IT the management cost savings it needs while also providing users with the PC user experience they demand. Today, desktop virtualization and desktop management solutions overlap in how they manage Windows. DV reduces management costs, but burdens the user who can’t work offline, has difficulty over a slow connection, or with multimedia. On the other hand, desktop management enables the user to work offline or over a slow connection, and allows the use of multimedia, but burdens IT. This needs to be fixed. Desktop virtualization can no longer just provide the management cost savings for IT, but a substandard user experience and the reverse goes for desktop management.

Hardware performance is outpacing the software need for the performance for business.
The new Ultrabooks from Intel provide incredible performance. While great for gaming, this performance will soon exceed the performance for applications that many business users need. This extra horsepower provides the capability for the BYOC model as described above. This steady growth in performance for the same or lower price, just as you see with other electronics like big screen TVs, also drives down mid-range and low-end model prices. Lower prices, increased power efficiency and simplified PC management resulting from number four above will make it difficult for thin client terminal vendors to compete – especially with such lower volumes.

Overall, the paradigm of the desktop begins to take a backseat to user applications, files and profile information. While the concept of a desktop on a PC will remain for some time and will need to be managed appropriately, there is no similar concept on a mobile device. We are already starting to see these types of consumer clouds set up for music, photos, contacts, etc. from Apple and Amazon. It is just a matter of time for the same type of cloud to exist for business so that users can access their applications, files and profile information whether they are on a computer or a device, physical or virtual.

Source:http://www.forbes.com/sites/ciocentral/2012/05/03/5-ways-the-corporate-pc-market-is-evolving/

Flashback malware exposes big gaps in Apple security response

April 30th, 2012

In one of those great ironies of technology, an increased incidence of malware is a sign that your product has been a success in the market.

Apple’s been astonishingly successful with its Mac hardware in recent years. The dark side of that success is the attention they’ve begun to attract from online criminals.

Apple and its customers got a hint of what was in store with last year’s Mac Defender outbreak. This year, a much larger and more disturbing outbreak has infected more than 600,000 Macs with a piece of malware called Flashback.The entire Flashback episode has in fact exposed Apple’s security weak spots.

Eugene Kaspersky last week argued that Apple is “ten years behind Microsoft in terms of security.”

Those aren’t just self-serving statements from a company that sells security software. Kaspersky’s argument didn’t even mention antivirus solutions. Instead, he said, Apple’s security efforts have been slow, reactive, and generally ineffective:

We now expect to see more and more because cyber criminals learn from success and this was the first successful one. [Apple] will understand very soon that they have the same problems Microsoft had ten or 12 years ago. They will have to make changes in terms of the cycle of updates and so on and will be forced to invest more into their security audits for the software. That’s what Microsoft did in the past after so many incidents like Blaster and the more complicated worms that infected millions of computers in a short time. They had to do a lot of work to check the code to find mistakes and vulnerabilities. Now it’s time for Apple [to do that].

Let’s be clear: Both Microsoft and Apple are victims of organized crime in all of these attacks, and they’re in the unenviable position of having to fight legal battles and make substantial engineering investments on behalf of their customers. It is, unfortunately, a cost of doing business.

All complex software has vulnerabilities, even when it’s written with the most disciplined processes. Bad guys make a lucrative business out of finding those vulnerabilities and writing exploits for them. Eliminating malware completely is a pipe dream, especially on relatively open platforms like Windows and OS X. No one seriously believes it’s possible to eliminate street crime, either, but effective policing and attention to the underlying causes of crime can significantly reduce rates.

A lot of what Apple is learning about security today will show up in future editions of OS X and iOS, as the company presumably gets smarter about writing code. But what about the 60 or 70 million current Mac owners?

They have a right to expect much more of a security response from Apple than they’re getting now. As an Apple customer myself, I believe Apple deserves four key criticisms of its current approach to security.

1. Apple is too slow to deliver updates

When the size of this incident first became apparent, I wrote:

What makes this outbreak especially chilling is that the owners of infected Macs didn’t have to fall for social engineering, give away their administrative password, or do something stupid. … The Flashback malware in its current incarnation does not use an installer. It does not require that the user enter a password or click OK in a dialog box. It is a drive-by download that installs itself silently and with absolutely no user action required, and it is triggered by the simple act of viewing a website using a Mac on which Java is installed.

Apple brags that it is quick to respond to security issues. Here, for example, is what you see if you visit Apple’s “Why you’ll love a Mac” page:

Unfortunately, that bold statement is contradicted by the facts.

Apple’s update that fixed the Java security hole was released April 3, 2012. That’s 49 days after Oracle released Java SE 6 Update 31 for all other platforms. During that seven-week period, every Apple customer who had Java installed (and that includes every Mac owner running Leopard and Snow Leopard) was vulnerable to a silent installation of malware. Ultimately, Apple had to release an update that fixed the security hole and removed the malware already installed on its customers’ Macs.

That long gap in Apple’s response is not unusual, as independent security expert Brian Krebs has pointed out:

Apple maintains its own version of Java, and as with this release, it has typically fallen unacceptably far behind Oracle in patching critical flaws in this heavily-targeted and cross-platform application. In 2009, I examined Apple’s patch delays on Java and found that the company patched Java flaws on average about six months after official releases were made available by then-Java maintainer Sun.

Apple’s performance in recent years has been much better in terms of Java updates, but still slow. Oracle has released six security-related updates to Java SE 6 in the past two years. In five of those six updates, it took Apple at least three additional weeks to release its version of the update. Two of Apple’s updates arrived more than 30 days later than those available to other platforms.

So what happens when the next Java vulnerability is discovered and patched by Oracle? How long will Mac users have to wait for their updates? Or, to put it another way, how much of a window of opportunity will malware authors have to attack Macs?

2. Apple offers no automatic update option

Even when updates are available, they’re only effective if they’re applied. And every security researcher knows that a nontrivial percentage of users simply ignore updates.

As Mac expert Glenn Fleishman noted the other day (via Twitter), “Legions of children manage updates for parents and grandparents.” That’s because they know that, left to their own devices, many unsophisticated users will simply postpone those updates by clicking the “Not Now” or “Install Later” button. They see updates as an annoyance that will mean they they can’t use their Mac for 10 minutes to a half-hour.

So how bad is the problem? Based on data collected by Dr. Web, roughly 1 out of every 4 Snow Leopard users are at least six months behind in terms of applying major software updates. Nearly 15% are more than a year behind, meaning they have skipped at least two major OS X updates and are easy prey for any exploit that targets security holes that were fixed in those updates.

User education only goes so far. When you go home for the holidays, you can configure Software Update so that it downloads new updates automatically. But you can’t set up OS X to install those updates automatically, as you can with Windows.

Automatic updates would not, of course, bring the percentage of up-to-date installations anywhere near 100%. But it could make a difference for a few percent. And in a user base of 70 million (and growing), even a 3% improvement means 2 million Macs that are better protected than they are today.

3. Apple is too quick to abandon its customers

Although Apple has never said so publicly, it’s common knowledge among Mac experts that Apple provides updates (security and otherwise) only for the current OS X version and the most recent.

That means Macs that are between three and five years old are left unprotected unless their owners pay for an upgrade to a new version of OS X. (Apple charges $29 to upgrade from Leopard to Snow Leopard and another $30 to upgrade from Snow Leopard to Lion.)

According to Dr. Web’s data, 25% of all Flashback-infected Macs are running Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard. Net Market Share statistics suggest that at least 17% of all Macs in use today are running Leopard (or an earlier version of OS X).

Leopard shipped August 25, 2007. It was sold on new Macs for two full years. Customers purchased 5.7 million computers with Leopard installed in the first half of 2009. Those computers are all roughly three years old today, and most can expect to have at least two or three more years of useful life. Apple does not provide updates to these computers unless the customer purchases and installs a new version of OS X.

Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6) shipped August 28, 2009, and was on sale for almost two years, until Lion shipped on July 20, 2011. It is still the most popular version of OS X today, according to these March 2012 Net Market Share figures:

If Apple maintains its current policy, then as soon as OS X Mountain Lion goes on sale, probably in July or August, Apple will drop support for the Macs it sold with Snow Leopard installed. Every one of those unsupported Macs will be three years old or less.

Or, to put it another way:

Apple sold about 27 million Macs in 2009 and 2010. By the end of this summer, in September 2012, every one of those Macs will be unsupported in its original, as-purchased configuration.

Microsoft has a support lifecycle of 10 years for each version of Windows. While that may be too much to expect of Apple, it’s clear that there’s a radical disconnect between the useful life of Apple hardware and the company’s support for the combination of hardware and software that it sells.

Users have many reasons besides cost to avoid the headaches of upgrades. I’ve yet to read an enthusiastic review of OS X Lion, and I’ve heard many people compare Lion to Windows Vista.

But the point is, Apple offers its customers the choice of whether to upgrade to a new OS. The company shouldn’t be allowed to refuse to deliver essential security updates to Macs that are three to five years old. That’s gross negligence.

4. Apple doesn’t communicate well

Apple’s first public statement that mentioned the Flashback malware outbreak came on April 14, with a support bulletin titled “About Flashback malware.” That was more than a week after security researchers and news sites like ZDNet had sounded the alarm. In its Java updates on April 3, Apple did not communicate any sense of urgency, even though they had to have known by that time that exploits were in the wild and wreaking havoc on Mac owners.

Apple doesn’t communicate well with security researchers, either. Boris Sharov, chief executive of the Moscow-based security firm Dr. Web, told Andy Greenberg of Forbes that his researchers were ignored when they tried to contact Apple with their findings: “We’ve given them all the data we have. We’ve heard nothing from them…” The only contact from Apple, in fact, was a demand to take down the “sinkhole” domain that Dr. Web researchers were using to study the distribution and behavior of the Flashback botnet.

To this day, in fact, Apple has not issued any statement aimed at the general public or the mainstream news media. Apple’s dilemma is a painful one here: If they talk to the press in an effort to reach owners of Macs who aren’t aware they’ve been infected, they risk puncturing the “Macs don’t get viruses” image they’ve cultivated through the years. So the company has chosen to remain silent, which is shameful.

Apple’s legendary secrecy is an asset when it comes to product development and launch-day hype. Somehow, the company has to overcome that desire for secrecy when it comes to security.

For its customers’ sake, it desperately needs to think different.

Source:http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/flashback-malware-exposes-big-gaps-in-apple-security-response/4904?tag=content;siu-container

Apple working on new power management technology for future Macs

April 18th, 2012

Apple’s plans were revealed in a newly published job application discovered by AppleInsider, for a position entitled “Senior DC-DC Power System Design Engineer.” The available position is located at Apple’s Cupertino, Calif. corporate headquarters.

The advertised job describes the role as “an excellent opportunity to work on the forefront of new power management technologies.” The new hire will join a team that will innovate in power use from concept investigation and design through product implementation.

“The position primarily involves (advanced) DC-DC power design and development for Apple’s next generation Macintosh platforms,” the listing reads, “spanning from notebook computers, desktop computers, servers and standalone displays.”

Included in the job advertised on Apple’s official website is a wide ranging list of 11 key areas where the employee will work. One of those elements is in improving power metric performance optimization, with a focus on efficiency, power density, cost, reduced carbon footprint, and scalability.

Also mentioned in the listing are “new power architectures” for CPUs and graphics processors, as well as circuit design for the chips that power Mac hardware. The position will see them work closely with Apple’s computer system hardware team for DC-DC power designs integration.

The listing also makes mention of optimizing power use with “white LED backlight drivers,” related to the LCD screens found on Apple’s iMac and MacBook lineups.

Apple would prefer to hire an employee with a PhD in power electronics. Candidates must have at least 8 years of experience in the field to be considered for the high-level position.

Source:http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/12/04/17/apple_working_on_new_power_management_technology_for_future_macs.html

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes