Posts Tagged ‘Amazon’

Amazon’s Kindle Fire ready to rival Apple’s iPad

September 30th, 2011

Amazon’s unveiling of the Kindle Fire tablet computer sends a bright-hot message: the online retailer is ready to rival iPad maker Apple in an effort to be the world’s top digital content provider.
It may sound odd coming from a company that pioneered online sales of physical products, selling its first book, Douglas Hofstadter’s Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought, in 1995. But since it first entered the digital market in 2006 with its video download store, Amazon has bet consumers will pay for high-quality digital content.
In addition to the millions of actual items it sells, which range from toys to toothbrushes, Amazon’s trove of digital content now includes more than 1 million e-books, 100,000 movies and TV shows and 17 million songs. This is about 1 million fewer songs than iPad maker Apple sells, but more than twice as many e-books and many thousands more TV shows and movies.
Advertisement: Story continues below
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is confident that its content is what will help the Kindle Fire do better than others who have trotted out tablets.
“The reason they haven’t been successful is because they made tablets. They didn’t make services,” Bezos said in an interview after his company unveiled the tablet at a New York media event Wednesday in the US.
Bezos, a 47-year-old former Wall Street money manager, built Amazon on exactly this sort of confidence. He started the company on the theory that a web-based book store would resonate with consumers, since it seemed like the easiest way to browse millions of titles at once.
He was right. The company grew rapidly and Amazon began trading publicly in May 1997, despite never having turned a profit. It took five more years — and the addition of product categories like CDs, DVDs and consumer electronics — before the online retailer reported any net income. These days, Amazon consistently reports strong growth: in the most recent quarter, it earned $US191 million on $US9.91 billion in revenue.
It was Apple that moved into digital content first, however. With the arrival of Apple’s iPod digital music player, which first came out in 2001, Apple figured consumers would be willing to pay for legal, high-quality digital music they could download to the devices. Apple became a major player early on, making deals with major record labels to sell digital tunes through its iTunes Store in 2003. Soon the iPod became more multimedia-savvy: Apple added TV shows in 2005 and movie downloads a year later.
Amazon soon entered the market itself, rolling out its own digital video downloading service in 2006 and music downloading service a year later.
It was in 2007, though, that things really heated up. That’s when Amazon rolled out its first Kindle e-reader, upending the book market once again by turning the focus from costly paper books to electronic ones that could be delivered quickly and cheaply to customers on a reading device.
The Kindle rapidly grew the company’s e-book business, and Amazon said in May that it was selling more e-books than physical copies of books. But the Kindle Fire’s ability to show e-books, surf the web, stream movies and TV shows and support apps positions it as an even better catalyst for Amazon’s digital goods sales.
The price will probably help, too: when it goes on sale on November 15 in the US, it will cost $US199, which is less than half of the $579 you’ll pay for Apple ’s cheapest iPad and less than book seller Barnes & Noble’s Nook Colour e-reader, which isn’t available in Australia. This leaves buyers with plenty of money left over to spend on content.
Unfortunately for Australians there is no release date yet for a local launch of the Fire, with a spokeswoman for Amazon yesterday saying that that the Kindle Fire would only be available in the US.
“It’s important to remember at the end of the day that Amazon’s core business is retailing and this is a way to sell more digital media on a sort of 7-inch [17.78-centimetre] vending machine,” NPD Group analyst Ross Rubin said.
The Kindle Fire, which runs Google’s Android software, is clearly meant for gobbling up Amazon’s digital media in particular. While most Android tablets include access to Google’s Android Market for downloading games and apps, the Fire will eschew that in favour of Amazon’s own app store. And while the tablet doesn’t have much storage space — 8 gigabytes, compared with 16 GB on the cheapest iPad — Amazon is offering users free web-based storage for any digital content they buy from Amazon.
Another weapon in Amazon’s arsenal: in hopes of keeping Kindle Fire users purchasing both digital and actual items, the tablet includes a free month of Amazon’s premium shipping service, Amazon Prime. Prime, which costs $US79 per year, gives users unlimited two-day shipping on any items they buy from Amazon, as well as free access to a library of 11,000 streaming movies and TV shows. This is about half of what Netflix’s streaming library has. Netflix is not available in Australia.
Amazon has never said precisely how many Kindle e-readers it has sold, but its higher sales of e-books than print books indicates it’s a strong performer. Given this, and the general popularity of tablets, expectations are high for the Fire.
Rubin thinks consumers will become fans of the tablet, saying it offers a more complete media consumption experience than what Barnes & Noble has provided with the Nook Colour, which came out last year.
Forrester Research analyst Sarah Rotman Epps thinks Amazon could sell as many as 5 million Fires by the end of the year, but thinks it will probably be closer to 3 million since it’s coming out so late. Apple, by comparison, has sold nearly 29 million iPads since it released the first one in April 2010, and over 9 million in the June quarter alone.
Of course, in addition to being the new tablet on the block, the Kindle Fire faces other challenges. On the content side, the Amazon Appstore currently includes more than 16,000 apps, but this is just a small fraction of the 425,000 apps in Apple’s App Store, over 100,000 of which are tailored specifically for the iPad. On the tablet side, the device’s screen is on the small side, which means less space for watching movies and more panning around when surfing the web. And it will only be able to access the internet over wi-fi, not over wireless carriers’ high-speed data networks.
Still, Epps believes Amazon’s decision to lead with content and services, rather than hardware, will help it prosper with the Kindle Fire.
“Apple will still be the clear market leader, but Amazon will still be a clear number two because of that strategy,” she said.

Source:http://www.theage.com.au/digital-life/tablets/amazons-kindle-fire-ready-to-rival-apples-ipad-20110930-1l00p.html

Why Amazon’s Tablet Matters: It’s Not a Computer. It’s a Store.

September 29th, 2011

The tech world is going into hype-tastic overdrive today with the release of Amazon’s new tablet computer. If the predictions and previews are correct, the new device could be a big competitor to the market-defining Apple iPad and cement Amazon as a major player in the computing game.

But this isn’t really about the chunk of hardware that Amazon will be showing off. The reason Amazon’s entry into the tablet market is such a big deal has much more to do with all the merchandise and media that Amazon can put in your hands, without having to pay Apple some pretty hefty tolls for the privilege.

I’m not saying that competition with Apple in the tablet market isn’t a major piece of this story. Plenty of others have come out with me-too devices to follow the iPad, just as millions of people own smartphones from some other company. But none of those tablets has done much to dent the iPad’s hold on the market. Amazon’s move into tablets, however, is the only effort so far to fundamentally copy the Apple playbook, bringing a unified software, hardware, and application experience to the user.

That’s hugely significant as a piece of business strategy, because it signals that one of the more innovative companies around is truly dumping the old Microsoft view of the world, where companies specialize in one area (like software, or retail) and get others to build around that brand. It’s another vote—a big one—for Apple’s approach, and if it catches on, you’re going to see more movement in that direction. That’s surely part of the reason why Google would pay billions for Motorola.

But something much more basic is going on here. Amazon isn’t putting out tablet computers because it wants to be a computer-maker. It’s doing so because Amazon is fundamentally a retailer, and the tablet is the new digital store.

“People leaning back on their sofas, buying things from Amazon, is another tailwind for our business that I’m very excited about,” CEO Jeff Bezos said during this June’s shareholder’s meeting.

Source:http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2011/09/28/why-amazons-tablet-matters-its-not-a-computer-its-a-store/

Price of new Amazon tablet could be big attraction

September 28th, 2011

Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) is expected to launch its long-awaited tablet computer on Wednesday, sporting a low-enough price to give Apple Inc’s (AAPL.O) iPad some serious competition for the first time.

At a news conference Wednesday morning in New York, Amazon will likely unveil a seven-inch tablet that will let users read e-books, download digital music and video games and stream movies and TV shows.

Analysts expect the tablet to be priced around $250, roughly half the price of Apple’s dominant iPad, which starts at $499.

“If Amazon prices the Kindle Fire at $250, it has the potential to become the most successful competitor to the iPad,” Gene Munster, an analyst at PiperJaffray, said on Tuesday.

Having its own tablet is important for Amazon because the company has amassed a mountain of digital goods and services that could be sold through such a device. As the world’s largest Internet retailer, a tablet might also encourage Amazon customers to shop online for physical products more often.

Munster surveyed 410 consumers last week, asking whether they would buy a 10-inch iPad for $599 or a seven-inch Amazon tablet at $249.

Just over 60 percent of those surveyed said they would purchase the Amazon device, while 21 percent said they would likely buy the iPad, Munster reported. The analyst used a $599 price because he said that is the average price of the iPad.

“It all comes down to price point,” said Colin Gillis, an analyst at BGC Parnters. “To crack into the tablet market, that’s really the only variable where you can truly compete right now.”

A lower price on Amazon’s tablet will likely mean the device will have fewer bells and whistles than the iPad.

Amazon outsourced the hardware design and manufacture to Quanta Computer Inc (2382.TW), a big Taiwan-based firm that makes computers and tablets for other PC companies, according to consumer-electronic news website gdgt.com.

Mary Osako, a spokeswoman at Amazon, did not return a phone message and email sent seeking comment.

The Kindle Fire may have a slower processor than Research in Motion Ltd’s (RIM.TO) PlayBook, which was also made by Quanta, gdgt.com reported this week. TechCrunch said the Kindle Fire will not have cameras, unlike the iPad.

Still, Munster said a lack of high-end features might not deter most tablet users.

PiperJaffray’s survey found the top four uses of tablets were Internet browsing, reading, watching movies and playing games.

Source:http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/27/amazon-idUSS1E78Q18620110927

Waterstone’s plans Amazon Kindle ebook rival

September 9th, 2011

Waterstone’s is going from hardbacks to hardware with the launch of an ebook reader. The highstreet bookshop plans to compete with the Amazon Kindle, inspired by US bookseller Barnes & Noble’s Nook.

Waterstone’s own digital e-reader will let you download and read electronic books. Ebook readers can store thousands of titles, making them ideal for holidays or long commutes. And they’re certainly big business: ebooks outsell paperbacks in the US, even if they do bring a new threat of piracy. Barnes & Noble reckons it will make £1.1bn from Nook ebooks this year.

They’re also expected to get a big boost with the long-awaited arrival of a certain wizard in electronic form when Harry Potter hits the Pottermore site.

Ebooks have attracted the attention of the big players: Google Books is an ebook store from the search giant, and Apple has iBooks for the iPad and iPhone. On the hardware side, Sony has a range of high-tech readers such as the Sony PRS-T1, with cheaper alternatives made by the likes of Cooler and iRiver.

But the undisputed king of ebook readers is the Kindle. Loved by Alan Partridge, the Kindle is at the heart of a sophisticated ebook ecosystem. Thanks to apps and online service Kindle Cloud Reader you can read a book on your phone, reader and computer and they all remember where you’re up to.

On top of that, Amazon is planning a Kindle tablet, perhaps as soon as the end of this year.

But Waterstone’s bosses promise a reader “which is at least as good, and preferably substantially better, than that of our Internet rival, and you will have a much better buying experience purchasing your books through us.” Them’s fightin’ words.

The Waterstone’s reader is scheduled to launch in spring 2012.

Source:http://crave.cnet.co.uk/gadgets/waterstones-plans-amazon-kindle-ebook-rival-50005103/

Is this the Amazon Android tablet logo?

August 23rd, 2011

The Amazon Android tablet has been rumoured to be set for an October release for some time which makes Amazon’s application for a set of new trademarks rather intriguing. The documents relate to Lab126, Amazon’s hardware division, which develops the Amazon Kindle and is said to be hard at work on the Amazon Android tablets.

The logo above has long been the Lab126 logo but the trademark filing that Amazon submitted on August 16 under the classification “design and development of computer hardware and software” is the first time the company has attempted to protect the division’s brand.

That could simply be a case of Amazon rather tardily protecting itself legally but the timing has got us wondering whether the logo is about to do double duty as branding for the Amazon Android tablet. Then again after Jeff Bezos teasing us with the prospect for so long, we could just be imagining things.

source:http://electricpig.co.uk/2011/08/22/is-this-the-amazon-android-tablet-logo/

Lab126 trademark filings hint at Amazon’s upcoming Android tablet

August 23rd, 2011

Amazon.com has applied for name and logo trademarks for its hardware group, Lab126, in what’s become another clue that the company is about to release a color-screen, Android-based tablet.

The trademark applications were filed Aug. 16 for “design and development of computer hardware and software” and were discovered by GeekWire over the weekend. The company’s logo, included in the trademark filing, is a bit of a Rorshach inkblot test, but it looks an awful lot like the universal power button (image below to the right).

Lab126 has been around since 2006, so it is interesting that trademarks for that name and logo are just now being conducted. The trademark filings don’t specifically indicate that the Lab126 logo will be a part of the Amazon tablet, but they do show Lab126 is about to get serious. There’s been a slow trickle of evidence since earlier this year that an Amazon tablet is in the works. The Wall Street Journal reported back in July that an Amazon tablet could come by the end of October, just in time for the holidays.

Another bold clue for a new device is the Lab126 website, which shows the evolution of Kindle design, ending with a blank rectangle titled “the next revolution.” This could just signal a new touchscreen Kindle, but the company is behind all of Amazon’s hardware, so that blank rectangle could be a number of other Amazon devices in the works — including a tablet or even music players.

Interestingly, Lab126 is hiring several Android-based positions. The group is located in Cupertino, strategically close to Apple (Amazon HQ is in Seattle).

The Amazon tablet will compete with Apple’s iPad, however Amazon will be working hard to make it’s tablet unique. WSJ interviewed people who had seen the Amazon device (back in July), and they noted it didn’t have a camera. This could have changed, since the tablet will certainly have gone through several iterations since the article was published, but the lack of a camera indicates Amazon is less concerned with video chat than Apple. Amazon will probably focus more on its e-commerce platform, cloud computing infrastructure and media market place of digital books, movies and television shows. But no camera also means lower price (Amazon’s tablet could go for as low as $250), which could encourage holiday shoppers to opt for Amazon over Apple.

Barnes & Noble and Kobo are gearing up for their holiday marketing campaigns and it will be interesting to see how they position their products before and after Amazon’s touchscreen Kindle and tablet are released. Amazon will have one less big-name tablet to compete during the holidays, since HP is no longer making the TouchPad.

Source:http://venturebeat.com/2011/08/22/trademark-filings-are-latest-hint-at-amazons-pending-android-tablet/

Amazon’s Kindle tablet doesn’t need to be an ‘iPad killer’ to be a winner

July 29th, 2011

‘Amazon’s Kindle Tablet Will Only Support Two Fingers To The iPad’s Ten’ hyperventilates Ed Sutherland over on Cult of Mac, missing the point entirely. Amazon’t Kindle tablet doesn’t have to be an ‘iPad killer’ to be a success.

Sutherland goes on to argue that the iPad’s 10-finger gesture support is far superior to what Amazon is expected to bring out:

Now, the ‘Cult of Mac’ name should offer you a clue as to the site’s affiliations. With a name like that you expect there to be gushing praise for anything coming from the Apple mothership and seething hatred for anything not featuring the Apple logo seal of approval.

OK, back to this Kindle tablet vs iPad argument. There seems to be a feeling within tech pundit circles that technology has to kill other technology in order to succeed (some sort of Highlander ‘There can only be one’ thing …). Not true. This s why we have PCs and Macs, Intel CPUs and AMD CPUs, NVIDIA GPUs and AMD GPUs (and Intel GPUs), countless cellphones, tablets, mice, keyboards … cars, trucks … yes, there can be more than one.

My take on the Amazon tablet is that despite being a tablet, it will compete in a different market than the iPad. People who want an iPad either already have one or are planning to buy one at some point. These people are unlikely to be swayed by any other tablet no matter who makes it. Apple can easily sell every iPad it makes, and the Amazon Kindle tablet is unlikely to change that.

But the market is larger than that of the iPad. To begin with, there are people out there who, for whatever reason, don’t want an iPad and won’t buy one. Apple has carved out a niche for itself and has a secure market base (for now at any rate).

But that doesn’t mean we should rule out the Kindle tablet. So far all we know about this device is based on superstition rumor but it’s a fair bet that Amazon hasn’t been resting on its laurels. The company has undoubtedly learned a lot from the Kindle ebook reader and we should be seeing the fruits of this baked into its tablet. Look at how the Kindle ebook reader has improved over several incarnations (not to mention how much the price has come down). Amazon might not be a hardware company, but it’s made all the right moves with the Kindle.

Amazon also has a lot of digital services it can integrate into its tablet. Aside from ebooks, Amazon has a music service, a video service, an Android app store, a games and software downloads service, cloud services and audiobooks (Amazon owns Audible.com). Integrating these services into a single device would make a Kindle tablet compelling for hardcore Amazon users … and in my experience there are a LOT of hardcore Amazon users out there. And it will be this market – people already in the Amazon ecosystem – that Amazon will target. Forget about trying to convince people who think that the iPad is great that the Kindle tablet is better; that’s too hard. The Kindle is already a #1 bestseller and has the most 5-star reviews of any product on Amazon – and that’s despite competing not only against other ebook readers but also the iPad.

Amazon has already managed to get the Kindle down to $114, which shows that the company carries come clout with the component supply chain and assembly folks. Given this, it’s not hard to see how it could come out with a very competitive tablet at a very competitive price. And one that will sell – without needing to support 11-finger gestures.

Source:http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/amazons-kindle-tablet-doesnt-need-to-be-an-ipad-killer-to-be-a-winner/13939

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes