Archive for December, 2011

Intel Thunderbolt Coming to Windows PCs in April

December 28th, 2011

Digitimes reports that Thunderbolt-supported motherboards, notebooks and desktop PCs are on their way and are being prepared for an early Q2 launch.

Initially, Thunderbolt carried a cost of more than $20 per device and is prohibitively expensive for most computer systems. The cost may drop in the second half of the year as the technology is adapted on a much broader range, but Intel will have to actively support and drive the technology into the market to make it a success.

Digitimes said that Sony will pick up Thunderbolt and Asustek Computer will, at least, put the technology into its high-end systems. Gigabyte will be launching a Thunderbolt motherboard in April. Intel confirmed in September that Acer and Asustek Computer will introduce Thunderbolt computers in 2012 to begin the breakaway of the interface as an Apple-exclusive technology.

Source:http://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-lightpeak-thunderbolt-acer-asus,14370.html

Computer work without distractions

December 28th, 2011

With the fog of Facebook, YouTube and emails that seem to regularly pop up on computer screens, it’s a wonder anyone ever gets any actual work done these days.

Try as one might to concentrate, the internet generally means that distractions — social networks, news updates, or emails from friends — are but a click away for most workers.

The good news for procrastinators and the easily distracted is that there are tools out there that will block distractions such as Facebook and YouTube and even stop email alerts.
[ Get the latest IT news on the Australian government and businesses in Computerworld's Business & Government newsletter ]

The bad news is that you’ll still need loads of willpower to make such systems really work.

Evolution can be thanked for the fact that humans are so easily distracted.

If something moves nearby, our attention is automatically directed towards it. Psychologists call this an orientation reaction.

Once, it was necessary for survival. After all, the flash of movement could easily be a hungry sabretooth tiger.

The instinct remains, even though offices are rarely the site of life-or-death situations. That means humans are routinely overloaded with input in today’s fast-paced workplace, says Andreas Zimber of the SRH University Heidelberg in Germany.

It doesn’t help that the ever-present emails seem to demand immediate answers.

“Because the medium is so fast, everyone expects that answers will come quickly,” says Zimber, a professor of business psychology. That leads to two problems.

First, says Zimber, people lack the focus to concentrate on important tasks. That focus is needed to work efficiently, and with less effort.

“Based on surveys, we know that interruptions at work are one of the main sources of disruption.”

The distractions also cater to procrastinators, providing a welcome excuse to shove unpleasant tasks further down on the to-do list.

“That’s when the hedonistic principle kicks in: I’ll pick the more pleasant task,” notes Zimber.

So what’s to be done? Zimber advises a system of compartmentalisation. If possible, lay down fixed office and visiting hours.

When it comes time to do important work, shut your email inbox and make sure everyone knows you’re entering a period of enforced isolation.

That could shut down the problem of three or four avenues of information coming in simultaneously. “Colleagues will usually understand,” says Zimber.

Some word processing programs even help enforce this practice.

For example, Focus Writer covers up all open windows and only shows the basic text upon which you’re working.

Toolbars and other extras only appear when you pull the mouse to the edge of the screen.

For those who need extra motivation, the programme allows them to set a writing goal — a set amount of time or a specific number of words. The free program runs on Windows, Max OS X and Linux.

But the distractions are always out there, especially if you just have to quickly check something online … and then find yourself stuck on Facebook. Two browser extensions promise to stop aimless surfing.

Stay Focused allows Chrome users to set a specific amount of time they are allowed to stay online. Users set their own list of no-go websites.

Many choose to block time-killers, such as video portals, games or social networks, while leaving accessible useful sites such as dictionaries or Wikipedia.

Leech Block performs a similar function for Firefox and Explorer.

Users get an icon reminding them a site is forbidden if they try to wander into no-go territory.

The free URL blocker works independently of the browser.

Still, none of these systems erases the need for discipline.

Committed time wasters can also just switch to non-blocked browsers or restart their computer to fool the efficiency programmes.

Procrastinators need to be honest about listing the time-killer websites to be blocked, ideally just as they’re experiencing some regret about recent dalliances.

Recognising the problem is the first step towards improvement.

That’s why programs such as RescueTime measure how much time is used for different activities.

The free version of the software, which runs on Windows and Mac, documents which programs and websites are visited on a computer.

A fee-based version goes further, listing how much time is spent on individual documents.

Both versions can provide eye-openers. As an added feature, the program allows a Focus Time function, which blocks certain activities for set periods.

Freelancers who work at home can do themselves a favour by having separate computers for work and leisure, no real problem with today’s hardware prices.

That’s another way to take control of the information flood.

Source:http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/411208/computer_work_without_distractions/?fp=4&fpid=1398720840

Smartphones set to make another leap forward

December 27th, 2011

For anyone who’s walking around with a ‘Siri’ enabled iPhone 4S, 2007 may seem like lost in haze of time. But it is in that year that the first iPhone was unveiled and went on to write history of smartphones.

The year 2011 has been a good one for the product category with stiff competition among vendors who are at the same time intent on creating models featuring ever higher screen resolutions and speedier quad-core processors and graphics processing units (GPUs).

All of which will continue in 2012 and even lead to a year of “mobile ascendancy”, according to IDC. Mobile devices will surpass PCs in both shipments and spending, while mobile apps, with 85 billion downloads, will generate more revenues than the mainframe market.

Put together, vendors will be able to build smartphones that will put in the shade all current offerings. The challenge will be to implement the hardware improvements in a way that won’t leave consumers even more disappointed with battery life than they are today.

While this year brought the arrival of the first smartphone equipped with LTE (Long Term Evolution) and NFC technology, 2012 will see those with improved battery performance.

According to IMS Research, the number of NFC-enabled phones shipped in 2011 totalled 35 million. The enabling of other cellular handsets will drive that number to nearly 80 million by the end of 2012.
Despite ups and downs for some vendors and operating systems, larger screen sizes are one of the hardware trends which have prompted Samsung to come out with the Galaxy Note’s 5.3-inch screen. There are a host of products whose screens measure between 3.5 and 4.7 inches. The iPhone already has lots of pixels, but the screen size has remained at 3.5 inches. However, along with LTE, the next iPhone 5 is expected to have a bigger screen.
But that doesn’t mean smartphones have no room left for innovation. It can be argued that screen and the overall size have reached a practical maximum, which means vendors have to find another performance metric to entice users to pick up a new handset.

Changing landscape
According to Ashraf Fawakherji, General Manager of Telecommunications Group at Samsung Gulf Electronics, the technology landscape will continue to change driven by factors such as a developed infrastructure, higher broadband speeds and growing consumer demand for the latest devices.

He said some of the trends that consumers can look forward to next year within the smartphone segment include changes in design, improved battery performance and screen sizes. In addition, 2012 will see the technical integration of various broadband technologies.

Higher resolution is a likely candidate. Recent arrivals like the LG Nitro HD and the Galaxy Nexus have already made the leap to a screen resolution at 1280×720 pixels, and more are reportedly on the way.

Next year, the 720p resolution will be a standard high-end feature. Many manufacturers are trying to devise methods to make small screens with a resolution of 720p.

Big screens have the unfortunate side effect of using a lot of power, but upcoming announcements will focus on advancements in making displays more energy-efficient, according to Geoff Blaber, an analyst at CCS Insight.

Weak processors have given way to dual-core powerhouses. Smartphone cameras are now so capable, the best of them make owning a point-and-shoot camera redundant. The top-motion animation film Gulps and Olive were shot using Nokia N8 phones with 12 mega pixel camera.

“Technology is moving so quickly and cell phones are really going to be the thing that does everything eventually,” Hooman Khalili, director of Olive, had said.

But Fawakherji and general manager for Motorola Mobility, Middle East and Africa Raed Hafez echoed in the same voice that we believe the smartphone will become a converged device making lives easier, it should not aim to replace professional digital cameras, which are proving increasingly popular among consumers. The two products serve very different consumer needs.
And display resolutions exceed the limits of the human eye’s ability to distinguish separate pixels.

Clock speeds will also increase next year. But improved performance won’t come from just faster main processors.
The GPU will also play a more important role in upcoming products, according to Blaber. ARMs Mali-T604 is one of the GPUs that will be used in high-end smartphones next year. It can also use four cores and offers five times the performance of previous Mali graphics processors, according to ARM.

Higher clock speeds
Tegra 3, a four-core processor and the world’s first quad-core mobile chip, will bring about a qualitative improvement in multi-tasking, web browsing and applications performance.

“Qualcomm is developing quad-core Snapdragon processors, which will be ready in 2012,” said Jay Srage, President of Middle East and Africa, Qualcomm.

“They will be part of the S4 class of Snapdragon processors. Still, the number of cores is not what’s important when it comes to mobile device performance. What matters most is how you integrate all parts of the processor — the CPU, graphics processor, software and other components — and make them work together efficiently,” Srage said.

“The smartphone industry is very much running in parallel to the computer industry. The fact that processors are moving from single core to eight cores on the chip will be repeated in the mobile industry but at a faster rate. To this end, we will absolutely see quad-core chips next year,” Hafez said.

According to Fawakherji, higher clock speeds and the use of dual and quad core technology are definitely two areas of interest for smartphone manufacturers. By incorporating chipsets that offer higher processing speeds, smartphone vendors such are able to develop devices that maximise run-time efficiency leading to noticeably smoother, faster and longer multi-tasking than ever before resulting in a more enjoyable experience for consumers.
The smartphone industry will mirror the computer industry, Hafez said, adding that if we go back a few years, the computer industry was on a clock-speed race. “At one point, this stopped and there was a realisation that pushing the clock was no longer a differentiation or a means to make an impact with the consumer. Instead, there was a move towards multiple cores. We’re going to see the same thing happening for smartphones where, for example, a 1.GHz quad-core chip will be faster than a 2 GHz single core chip.”
Following the launch of Siri, Google and Microsoft are no doubt scrambling to bring more voice controls to their respective smartphone platforms. As for Siri, there’s a slight chance that Apple will open up the virtual personal assistant to third-party apps in 2012. More likely, however, the company will expand Siri’s functionality in some fashion.

Augmented reality is another feature we have seen on a few apps here and there, but it will become a standard feature in the phones of tomorrow, as opposed to being limited to one-off apps such as Google Goggles or the Layar browser.
While smartphones will continue to improve noticeably in processor power, screen quality, and data speeds, battery life is likely to see only minor improvements compared to this year. The major technological breakthroughs that could keep users from worrying about getting through the day are still in the laboratory; so the best hope for better battery life lies in optimisation.

Smartphone trends for 2012 will be a highlight of the Consumer Electronics Show, which starts on January 10 in Las Vegas, and the Mobile World Congress, which takes place at the end of February in Barcelona.
Android rules the roost
Dubai: Android took the crown in the war of operating systems in 2011. But things are going to take a dramatic turn with the launch of Windows Phone 7.

With Nokia Lumia’s launch in major markets expected in the first quarter of next year, Windows market share will be ticking upwards from the current 5.6 per cent, behind Symbian in fifth place.

But by 2012 it will jump to 10.8 per cent, switching places with Symbian. And three years later in 2015, it will have surpassed iOS and Research in Motion, reaching 19.5 per cent market share, taking the No 2 spot in world market share.
Gartner predicts that RIM will fall from a 2010 peak market share of 16 per cent to 11.1 per cent by 2015. It also predicts that Apple iOS will rise this year, but fall by 2015.

Google’s Android will rise from a narrow lead of 22.7 per cent in 2010 to a dominant 49.2 per cent market share by 2012. Apple’s iOS will remain the second biggest platform worldwide through 2014 despite its share decreasing slightly after 2011.
Gartner analyst Roberta Cozza explained the Windows Phone growth, noting that Nokia will be able to sell Windows Phones at lower prices than many smartphones sold today and will sell them globally through an extensive sales channel.
Reduced price
Nokia will also retain its reputation for solid smartphone hardware in the Windows Phone alliance, she added. “All the strengths Nokia still has will play a role” in Windows Phone moving to second place in 2015, Cozza said.
With Apple’s iPhone 3GS sticking around for another year, we’ll probably see some strong competition in the sub-$50 (Dh183.50) range and not just with Android but Windows-enabled phones as well.
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has said that “the cheapest phones will be Android and we are trying to lower the production cost of smartphones, thereby reducing the sales price”.
“By 2015, 67 per cent of all open OS devices will have an average selling price of $300 or below, proving that smartphones have been finally truly democratised,” said Cozza.
“As vendors delivering Android-based devices continue to fight for market share, price will decrease to further benefit consumers.
“Android’s position at the high end of the market will remain strong, but its greatest volume opportunity in the longer term will be in the mid- to low-cost smartphones, above all in emerging markets

Source:http://gulfnews.com/business/features/smartphones-set-to-make-another-leap-forward-1.957308

Intellectual Ventures – Patent and Technology Landscape Report

December 27th, 2011

Intellectual Ventures LLC is a privately held company notable for being among the top five patent holders in the U.S.A. It has more than 35,000 intellectual property assets under its ownership in the USA and worldwide with a broad technological market coverage including agriculture, automotive, communications, computer hardware, construction, consumer electronics, ecommerce, energy, financial services, health technologies, information technology, life sciences, materials science, medical devices, nanotechnology, physical sciences, security, semiconductors, and software fields. Intellectual Ventures has acknowledged it intentionally withholds the true scope and nature of its IP portfolio. Its licensing transactions and interactions are protected by strict nondisclosure agreements, and the structure of its business activities makes it difficult to get a handle on the full extent of its activities. For example, our focus has identified more than 800 shell companies that Intellectual Ventures has used to conduct its intellectual property acquisitions, and it has taken considerable effort to identify these. The range and scope of its activities are so vast that it is difficult to conceptualize the reach of Intellectual Ventures. Intellectual Ventures saw $700 million in licensing revenue in the year 2010. The firm’s total licensing revenue to date amounts to roughly $2 billion.

Key findings:
The structure of the Intellectual Ventures network of operations makes it tremendously difficult to detect and trace the company’s activities. Intellectual Ventures has acknowledged that it uses shell companies for purchasing and holding patents, although it has not publicly identified the number of shells or their names. We identified more than 800 shell companies associated with Intellectual Ventures. And also IP activity based on publication year and priority year is observed and the trend shows that there is considerable growth. Citation analysis of assignees and technologies is carried out and the following results are recorded. Top cited patents list has also been furnished in the report.

This present report analyses consist of a brief introduction to the Shell companies. Detailed Class based taxonomy is also furnished. The report also consists of some key findings regarding Major shell company patents, IP activity over the years based on earliest priority year, publication year etc.

Source:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/intellectual-ventures—patent-and-technology-landscape-report-136250133.html

Intel Realigning Atom Processor Strategy Away from Netbooks

December 27th, 2011

Netbook sales aren’t what they used to be. A combination of factors ended the netbook craze that existed not all that long ago, including the rising popularity of tablet PCs, lower cost notebooks, and the recent introduction of highly portable Ultrabooks. Underscoring this point is the fact that Intel’s Atom processor and chipset revenue fell by nearly a third (32 percent) in the Q3 2011 compared to the same quarter in 2010, according to IHS iSuppli. So what does the future hold for Atom?

Looking ahead, Intel is shifting its Atom strategy towards network-attached storage (NAS) devices, entry-level servers, and embedded applications. This shift will begin with the introduction of Intel’s next Atom CPU — Centerton — built on a 32nm manufacturing process with a slim architecture and low power consumption, according to DigiTimes.

Skipping ahead to 2013, Intel will following up Centerton with 22nm Silvermont-based Atom processors, and then 14nm Airmont-based Atom chips in 2014. By then, Intel hopes to have a better foothold in the tablet PC market, the same one that’s been partially responsible for consumers’ waning interest in netbooks.

Source:http://hothardware.com/News/Intel-Realigning-Atom-Processor-Strategy-Away-from-Netbooks/

ASRock Shows Off Transformers Themed X79 Motherboard Pics

December 27th, 2011

ASRock recently posted a pair of pictures on its Facebook page that are sure to appeal to Transformers fans. One is of an X79 Optimus Prime motherboard and the other is themed after Bumblebee, also based Intel’s X79 chipset. As far as we can tell, these are concept shots and not actual boards, though if they are real, there’s a good chance both will be unveiled at CES in Las Vegas next month.

ASRock didn’t provide any specs for these boards, but other than the Transormers-themed makeover, they look identical to ASRock’s X79 Extreme9. We’re guessing the company’s design team was just having a little fun and that’s all this is, but then again, you can buy Transfomers-themed gear from Razer, such as mice and laptop covers.

Interesting sidenote: Hasbro recently filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Asus over its Transformer Prime tablet PC, so ASRock would be well advised to tread carefully here. ASRock, which sells a range of motherboard and mini PCs, was spun off from Asus back in 2002.

Source:http://hothardware.com/News/ASRock-Shows-Off-Transformers-Themed-X79-Motherboard-Pics/

Technology reviews: Asus’ UX21 and UX31 Zenbooks

December 27th, 2011

Taking a cue from the slim and sleek Macbook Air, a new set of notebook computers are starting to appear on store shelves. Dubbed “ultrabooks,” this new generation of laptops aims to lure Windows users with thin and lightweight bodies, quick start-up times and a long battery life.

Asus was among the first of several companies to unveil a line of ultrabooks this year. I’ve spent the past few weeks testing two new models, the UX21 and UX31 Zenbooks. Though they fall short when compared to the Macbook Air, these new laptops will probably fit the bill for loyal Windows users looking for a speedy computer in a stylish and portable package.

HARMONY IN DESIGN

Asus has not been shy in mimicking the Macbook Air. Its UX series of laptops, nicknamed the “Zenbook,” sport lightweight bodies that share a strong likeness to Apple’s coveted notebook, with all-metal exteriors, a razor-thin profile and tapered edges. And they are just as light as the Air: the 11-inch UX21 weighs 1.1kg, and the 13-inch UX31 weighs 1.31kg.

Though it’s hard not to think about Apple’s runaway hit when you look at them, the Zenbooks are beautiful in their own right.

The “Zen” in the design of these models can be found in the brushed metal lids (behind the screen), which are adorned with an intricate etching of concentric circles, much like the patterns commonly found in a Japanese rock garden. The silver metal chassis around the keyboard is etched with vertical lines that almost look like a wood grain pattern. The Zenbooks are certainly among the nicest-looking Windows laptops around, and they feel solid and well crafted.

Of course, looks only go so far, but Asus made a clear effort to achieve a harmony of form and function. The all-metal chiclet keyboard is smooth to the touch and comfortable for typing (I used the 13-inch UX31 to type most of this review); the LED screen (1366 by 768 pixels on the 11-inch model, 1,600 by 900 pixels on the 13-inch model) was bright and sharp, and fine for long periods of viewing.

Asus also took the “less is more” approach with the laptops’ hardware. The Zenbooks’ svelte shape is possible because there is no built-in DVD-ROM drive. Those who get the 11-inch model will have to do without an SD card slot (both models have several USB ports and a connection for an external monitor).

Asus loaned the Taipei Times its top-end models, both equipped with Intel’s Core i7 chip and 256 gigabyte solid-state hard drives. Performancewise, both Zenbook models are fast. There was barely any lag time when opening and closing programs, whether it was Windows Media Player, Windows Live Photo Gallery (photo editing software) or Internet Explorer.

Much of the Zenbooks’ speediness is due to the solid-state drives (or SSDs), another name for flash memory chips, which read and record data much faster than a mechanical hard drive.

Flash chips have no moving parts. Because of this, flash memory requires less power, which benefits battery life. With the 11-inch Zenbook, I managed around 4 hours and 40 minutes doing standard activities that included surfing the Internet, watching videos and using word processing software. With the 13-inch Zenbook, I clocked around 5 1/2 hours with “battery saving mode” (which is part of Asus’ included battery management software) turned on.

Both the 11-inch and 13-inch models turn on quickly and are ready to use right away, booting Windows 7 Home Premium in just over 20 seconds. But the laptop is designed so that you don’t have to shut it down every time you stop working. The Zenbooks automatically go into “sleep mode” when you close the lid, and turn on within seconds after you lift the lid.

A PESKY TRACKPAD

Beauty aside, there is one glaring and critical letdown with the Zenbooks: unwieldy and awkward trackpads, particularly on the 11-inch UX21. I found the trackpad to be overly sensitive to the point where the cursor would jump across the screen and leave me with a handful of random folders and programs opened by accident. While writing e-mails and notes for this review, I kept losing my place because my hand would accidentally swipe the trackpad, moving the cursor to another part of my document. At first, I thought I just needed to get used to the machine, but after four days, the trackpad remained a maddening experience.

Basic motions like highlighting text or dragging and dropping files seemed more difficult on the 11-inch model, perhaps because of the smaller trackpad. In general, I encountered fewer problems with navigating the cursor on the 13-inch model.

Most makers of Windows laptops can’t get it right when it comes to multi-touch functions on a trackpad. And Asus, unfortunately, is not an exception. With the Zenbooks, I found that two-finger scrolling (which lets you scroll down a page when you swipe down with two fingers) doesn’t even compare with my five-year-old Macbook.

Another multi-touch feature is pinch-to-zoom, which lets you shrink or enlarge the text in a Web browser by pinching two fingers together (or moving them further apart) on the trackpad. On the Zenbooks, there is a persistent lag. When I moved my fingers in either direction, there was a noticeable delay before anything happened. And, inevitably, the text would either turn out too big or small.

The simple solution, of course, is to just simultaneously press CTRL and the + or – keys to adjust text size. But isn’t the purpose of the multi-touch trackpad to spare us the need of keyboard shortcuts like this?

Also, the Zenbooks often confused two-finger scrolling and pinch-to-zoom gestures, which got annoying very fast while browsing the Web.

OUTDOING THE COMPETITION?

If you can tolerate an awkward trackpad — which I’m not sure I could with the 11-inch model — the Zenbooks offer an equally stylish alternative to the Macbook Air. And there are a few things to consider which might make Asus’ new laptop preferable to the Macbook Air.

As much as I disliked the trackpad, I found the Zenbook’s screen to be slightly more comfortable to look at in comparison to its Macbook Air counterpart, especially with the 11-inch models. The reason for this might be the darker border surrounding the Zenbook’s screen, which makes things seem bigger, at least to me. Your mileage may vary, so make sure you try out a demo model at your local electronics store before buying.

Some users might be impressed with the Zenbook’s audio speakers, which are made by Bang and Olufsen. The sound is loud and clear, with a notable amount of bass, but it’s not ground-breaking or amazing by any means. Though better than the average laptop’s speakers, they still sound tinny.

Early adopters might appreciate that the Zenbook comes equipped with a USB 3.0 port (in addition to another USB 2.0 part), which allows speedier data transfers if you have a compatible portable hard drive. The Zenbooks also come with a few freebies: a nice carry case and an USB Ethernet adapter.

Otherwise, Asus has tried to closely match the Macbook Air’s specs. The 11-inch Zenbook equivalent to the Macbook Air comes with the same Intel Core i5 processor and 128 gigabyte (GB) solid-state drive, and retails for NT$36,900, which is NT$1,000 less than the Air. With the 13-inch Zenbook, Asus’ model is equipped with the Intel Core i5 processor and a 128 gigabyte solid-state drive and retails for NT$39,900, NT$2,000 less than Apple’s equivalent.

Don’t get too hung up on the processor speeds (Intel Core i5 versus i7), and go by price and how much hard drive space you need if trying to decide which “ultrabook” to buy. Even the lower-priced Zenbooks will feel zippier than the average laptop, thanks to the solid-state hard drive.

The Zenbooks will appeal most to those who admire Apple’s design savvy but still want something different. However, the Macbook Air still edges out the competition when it comes to offering a complete package of smooth-running hardware and software. And Windows fans, remember: you can always install your favorite operating system on a Mac.

Source:http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2011/12/27/2003521716

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes