Archive for July, 2011

Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2011 Results

July 29th, 2011

Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CPSI), a leading provider of healthcare information solutions, today announced results for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011.

The Company also announced that its Board of Directors has declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.36 (thirty-six cents) per share, payable on August 26, 2011, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 11, 2011.

Total revenues for the second quarter ended June 30, 2011, increased 29.5% to $48.8 million, compared with total revenues of $37.7 million for the prior-year period. Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, increased 85.6% to $7.9 million, or $0.72 per diluted share, compared with $4.3 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Cash provided by operations for the second quarter of 2011 was $2.8 million, compared with $2.8 million for the prior-year period.

Total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011, increased 28.8% to $89.2 million, compared with total revenues of $69.3 million for the prior-year period. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2011, increased 85.0% to $13.3 million, or $1.21 per diluted share, compared with $7.2 million, or $0.66 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Cash provided by operations for the first half of 2011 was $17.1 million, compared with $8.6 million for the prior-year period.

For the third quarter of 2011, the Company anticipates total revenues of $44.0 million to $47.0 million and net income of approximately $6.3 million to $6.7 million, or $0.57 to $0.61 per diluted share. CPSI’s 12-month backlog as of June 30, 2011, was $129.0 million, consisting of $31.0 million in non-recurring system purchases and $98.0 million in recurring payments for support, Business Management Services, ASP and ISP contracts.

A listen-only simulcast and replay of CPSI’s second quarter 2011 conference call will be available on-line at www.cpsinet.com and www.earnings.com on July 29, 2011, beginning at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time.

Source:http://www.bradenton.com/2011/07/28/3381997/computer-programs-and-systems.html

HP’s fondle-slab dilemma: What to do when you’re No 2

July 28th, 2011

Analysis After just one year, the iPad is making more revenue than Apple’s 30-year-old personal computer division. It’s almost bringing in as much as Dell brings in from PCs. This is a huge business, already. And nobody can quite say what their iPad is good for. If ever a computer was a means to an end, then the iPad is it – rather than doing anything uniquely iPad-ish, it takes lots of “ends” a laptop (or Kindle, or smartphone) gets you to, and just gets you there slightly more conveniently. PCs are going to be around a long time; the iPad will be right there alongside them.

I’ve had a long weekend with HP’s rival, which is probably the best of the challengers. Our Reg Hardware review hits several nails firmly on the head – I won’t repeat too much of it below.

But what a dilemma the iPad poses for its rivals.

History tells us that commodity-priced rivals will take an increasing share of a consumer electronics market, as the market grows bigger. It happened remarkably quickly with Android and the iPhone. But right now, selling a rival tablet is extremely hard work. It’s not “a tablet market”, it’s still “an iPad market”, and punters are choosing which iPad to get (3G or not 3G?), and not which “tablet” to get. And for a lower price rival things are especially difficult – note how HP’s Bill of Materials costs are higher than Apple’s, thanks to the large volumes Jobs and Co command.

Which is all jolly unfair on HP, which made a very smart purchase with WebOS and has evidently thought hard about making its tablet an attractive buy.

I noticed several nice things about the TouchPad, some non-obvious, all quite thoughtful. Notifications are well done. It collects mail while asleep – using very little power. I didn’t ask it to. Setting up calendars and email out of the box is nice and straightforward. You get to Yahoo! mail without being a Yahoo! subscriber. Email has a much nicer UI than the iPad. The TouchPad makes Skype setup trivially easily, and backing up your stuff onto HP’s backup service is a couple of clicks. It prints, too – supporting many printers out of the box. The TouchPad’s stereo speakers lord it over the iPad’s weak, poorly placed mono speaker. Bing Maps with its Bird’s Eye View is much more useful than Google Maps – it could be even better if Ordnance Survey maps were licensed and integrated too, and Microsoft’s version of Google Kerb Crawler [I think you mean Street View – Ed] (when it’s ready).

And it’s very nice to have a four-row keyboard, one that can change sizes very easily. So you can see from that list it’s a quality product.

Set against that, there’s a creaking wait while many new apps are opened – in some cases 10 seconds, which really shouldn’t happen. Some gestures that are natural on a smartphone-sized gadget are cumbersome on a 9.7-inch one, particularly the full-screen vertical drag. There’s rather too long spent faffing about with accounts before you get up and running. And while the browser is no less functional than Safari on the iPad, the text rendering is … well, you have a look:

But what really struck home is how much of the value an iPad gives you comes from the third-party apps, and third-party hardware: from the (swearbox) open “ecosystem”. It’s that means to an end aspect: the iPad is just another way of playing music, reading web or books, watching TV. If you can’t do that, then it’s a problem. One example of iPad value is AirPlay. I use AirPlay a lot, I think it’s terrific, and the protocol is gradually being built into hi-fi. It’s not for audiophiles, and the latencies compare unfavourably with other broadcast audio systems. (The lag of a couple of seconds from one of the iPad guitar apps is quite a surreal experience.) But it’s there, requires minimal setup, and it works.

Less than a year ago I reported how people were fretting that AirPlay locked people into Apple’s walled garden – but that doesn’t seem to be the case. Once you have AirPlay speakers available on your LAN – and any old speakers will do – you can use them for other audio apps too. AirPlay doesn’t pipe music from your web browser to the speakers, but generally, it’s heading in the right direction.

To enhance your device with this kind of infrastructure relies on other people – and the spoils fall to a first-mover. To make the TouchPad a contender, it needs these kinds of deals. HP should hire a legendary schmoozer to make them happen.

As for third-party apps, they’re not really there yet – and the UK version of the HP App Catalog had a strong US feel, and had too many categories. Spotify is available on WebOS – but it isn’t in the app store. These apps should be up front. Maybe Spotify should be bundled, in a formal business arrangement?

HP has little option but to stick at it – making each part of WebOS that much better than the Apple version. But it also needs to enhance the whole proposition by getting people to stuff quicker and easier. This is a bit bleeding obvious: nobody in the high margin part of the tablet business really has any other choice. The received wisdom predicts that the tablet market will be carved up, but it may be the case that we’ll see cheap Chinese Android (or generic Linux) tablets take the lion’s share of volume – and only one company, by now so established it controls the infrastructure, with the lion’s share of the profits.

Source:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/28/hp_touchpad_where_do_we_go_from_here/

Network Security, Hardware Reliability Pose Challenges for Businesses: HP Report

July 28th, 2011

Computer processing speed and reliability top IT managers’ lists for most needed computer improvements.

According to a recent HP survey of more than 500 IT managers at small businesses across the United States, 93 percent of companies have placed cost concerns over the best IT solutions, leading 89 percent of those companies to experience IT-related problems. The study, conducted by Wakefield Research, uncovered that the top three IT problems reported by cost-conscious companies are low-performing hardware (46 percent), out-of-date hardware (37 percent) and unreliable hardware (23 percent), leading to suboptimal computing efficiency and an overall loss of productivity.

The survey also revealed that 54 percent of small businesses cite summer as the peak season for working remotely. With 58 percent of IT managers stating that they have not invested in network security this year, the report suggested companies will find they are adding pressure and potentially greater security risks to their already stressed IT networks.

Other key survey findings include computer processing speed (35 percent) and reliability (19 percent) top IT managers’ lists for most needed computer improvements. These practical considerations weigh more heavily on managers’ minds than energy efficiency (9 percent). When given the chance to tell their chief executive officers how to solve common concerns, IT managers recommend upgrading to newer and better quality components (29 percent), investing more money into IT systems (21 percent), and spending more time planning and researching the best solutions for their company’s needs (13 percent).

Forty-one percent of IT managers think that planning their company’s IT strategy is the best use of their time, compared to 11 percent of managers who believe their time is best spent on hardware support, and one-fifth of IT managers complained that their biggest computer problem is a lack of vendor assistance when problems occur.

“The survey findings confirm that budget-constrained small businesses are playing tug of war when it comes to balancing smart IT purchasing decisions and their budgets,” says Stephen DiFranco, senior vice president and general manager, of HP’s personal systems group, Americas. “HP has a portfolio of reliable, high-performing and secure Elite Series PCs that are business tough and tested to the extremes to ensure small businesses get a great return on investment and thrive in the market.”
The HP SMB IT Survey was conducted between May 31 and June 6, 2011, using an email invitation and an online survey. The company noted the results of any sample are subject to sampling variation and the magnitude of the variation is measurable and is affected by the number of interviews and the level of the percentages expressing the results. For the interviews conducted in this particular study, the chances are 95 in 100 that a survey result does not vary, plus or minus, by more than 4.4 percentage points from the result that would be obtained if interviews had been conducted with all persons in the universe represented by the sample.

Source:http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Midmarket/Network-Security-Hardware-Reliability-Pose-Challenges-for-Businesses-HP-Report-283878/

Apple is Among the Companies in the Computer Hardware Industry With the Highest Sales Growth (AAPL, CRAY, SGI, CCUR, SMCI)

July 28th, 2011

Below are the top five companies in the Computer Hardware industry in terms of sales growth.

Apple (AAPL) had year-over-year sales growth of 82% during the last quarter. The company has reported $100.3 billion in sales over the past 12 months and is expected to report $131.7 billion in sales in the next fiscal year.

Cray (CRAY) had year-over-year sales growth of 40.4% during the last quarter. The company has reported $330.9 million in sales over the past 12 months and is expected to report $345 million in sales in the next fiscal year.

Silicon Graphics International (SGI) had year-over-year sales growth of 33.2% during the last quarter. The company has reported $535.7 million in sales over the past 12 months and is expected to report $720 million in sales in the next fiscal year.

Concurrent Computer (CCUR) had year-over-year sales growth of 25.6% during the last quarter. The company has reported $69.8 million in sales over the past 12 months and is expected to report $75 million in sales in the next fiscal year.

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) had year-over-year sales growth of 23.8% during the last quarter. The company has reported $883.9 million in sales over the past 12 months and is expected to report $1.1 billion in sales in the next fiscal year.

SmarTrend currently has shares of Apple in an Uptrend and issued the Uptrend alert on June 27, 2011 at $330.57. The stock has risen 18.8% since the Uptrend alert was issued.

Source:http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Newsfeed/Article/134151496/201107280627/Apple-is-Among-the-Companies-in-the-Computer-Hardware-Industry-With.aspx

Human-rated Launcher Flight Computers In Works

July 28th, 2011

Developers of future human-rated launch vehicles will have a commercial flight computer to plug in if a new development internally funded by Ball Aerospace & Technologies works out.

The Boulder, Colo.-based spacecraft and space-components house based the design of its prototype launch vehicle flight computers on hardware already in use by NASA at Marshall Space Flight Center simulation laboratories for developing software and test systems for human-rated launch vehicles, according to Ball.

“These advanced avionics are directly applicable to future human exploration goals and objectives,” says Cary Ludtke, vice president and general manager of the Civil and Operational Space unit at Ball.

The fault-tolerant computers are designed for human-rated systems, Ball says. With NASA turning over to the private sector the job of transporting cargo and crew to the International Space Station (ISS), the company also has developed phased array antennas, avionic assemblies and cryogenic storage systems for future human spacecraft.

Ball also built the vision navigation sensor and the high-definition docking camera for Lockheed Martin’s Sensor Test for Orion Relative Navigation Risk Mitigation Development (Storrm) engineering testbed flown in two ISS approaches by the space shuttle Endeavour on the STS-134 mission in June.

Source:http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=space&id=news/asd/2011/07/27/12.xml&headline=Human-rated%20Launcher%20Flight%20Computers%20In%20Works

Hardware Makers Traded Flat With – In Focus: NTAP, DELL, LXK,

July 28th, 2011

NetApp (NASDAQ:NTAP), the storage and data management solutions provider traded at 47.28, which represents -5.78% versus its previous trading session close,added downward pressure to technology shares, with the Technology Select Sector Spider (NYSE:XLK) trading -2.03% from its previous trading session close.

Technology shares traded flat with the S&P500, which traded lower by -2.03%.

Among the computer hardware makers, NetApp was the worst performer in the Computer Hardware Index (NYSE:^HWI), which traded lower by 2.63%. The index is had a broad decline with only 1 component trading higher.

Dell (NASDAQ:DELL), is a worst performer as well. The 3rd largest personal computer maker in the world ended the trading session at $16.45 representing -3.91% Versus the previous trading session. Shares of Dell have defined support at $48.96 and resistance at $52.09.

Relative strength in the Computer Hardware Index was felt in Lexmark (NYSE:LXK), which was the top performer in the session, with the stock trading at $33.73 representing -0.59% versus the previous trading session. Shares of Lexmark, the maker of printers and imaging solutions have defined support at $28.45 and resistance at $30.26.

The other top performer was IBM (NYSE:IBM), which traded at $181.35 representing -0.86% from its previous close. IBM, the IT solutions and consulting services provider has calculated support and resistance levels at $151.71 and $185.63 respectively.

Source:http://www.tradershuddle.com/20110727270023/Stocks/hardware-makers-traded-flat-with-in-focus-ntap-dell-lxk-ibm.html

Is There Still Hope Left in the Future of the PC?

July 28th, 2011

Those who dominated the past three decades reveal weaknesses in markets that have made Apple the most profitable IT company. Should we make plans for the funeral of the PC?

The impression is certainly there. Microsoft had record revenue thanks to its Office business, server software and the Xbox 360. Windows, however, suffered from the third consecutive quarterly revenue decline. Is the market moving away from PCs and toward tablets and smartphones? Possibly. And what about Intel? Record revenue – the fifth record in a row – and net income that overshadows those glorious and hugely successful dotcom years. However Atom revenue and shipments are down and investors were disappointed, sending the stock down after the earnings announcement. It’s nothing unusual for Intel. I actually can’t remember the last time financial advisors and investors were jumping up and down in a similar way as they do over an Apple rumor. In all seriousness, Apple (or ARM) has still no competitive tablet processors, even if I am hearing that we should be seeing a significant announcement at IDF – sources at Intel claim that Intel CPUs will blow ARM out of the water. Given the success we are seeing at Apple, our negativism toward the PC and exaggerated expectations for the tablet, is it time to thank the PC for its service and simply say goodbye?

The Worst Case Scenario

If you have read my columns before, then you already know that I doubt that the tablet is what it is cracked to be. As long as Google and Android tablet makers keep shooting themselves in the foot, the tablet market will remain an iPad market. What we are seeing in the market today are largely unfinished products that are positioned wrong and ignore most lessons Apple should have taught them. For those who don’t want an iPad (yet), the only option is a (mobile) PC. Until there are competitive tablets out there, the threat to the notebook is somewhat contained.

Let’s also remember that about 400 million PCs will be sold this year, more than 225 million of them will be notebooks. Apple could be selling somewhere between 40 and 50 million iPads, which is pretty scary to PC makers, but then we also know that Apple has done its homework very well, better than PC makers have done theirs, and is harvesting the fruits of hard work. The most optimistic tablet shipment forecasts currently foresee about 220 – 250 million shipped tablets by 2015. These numbers indicate that the tablet may not be outselling the common PC anytime soon.

Also noteworthy is the fact that tablets and PCs have very different usage models. While the PC is much more a content creation device, the tablet is a content consumption device. In other words, the tablet is a lean-back device (if you imagine a scenario of using a tablet in a Starbucks), while the notebook is a lean-forward device. The ways we are using a notebook and tablet are not the same and it is unlikely that this will change in the next few years, unless one of two is able to bridge the gap to the other and destroy the opponent’s market.

Does it make sense that PC manufacturers squeeze into a market that is defined by Apple and the only opportunity is not to lose contact to the latest iPad. Possibly, for some. However, what would lead us to believe that the traditional PC is dead? Clever marketing? Bias? Hysteria?

The World In Your Hands

Let me revise my headline above. There is hope left for the PC. In fact, the market has never really changed, with the exception that Apple has created an incentive for PC makers to be creative again. Let’s be serious, with the exception of faster processors, form factor experiments and different colors, the PC is essentially the same it was in 1975 when Bill Gates had the vision of making a PC mainstream. 20 years later, Windows 3.11 made the PC mainstream and Microsoft carried the same excitement on its shoulders Apple has today. 15 years after Windows 95, we are still using a keyboard with a screen in front of us, despite decade-long promises of voice input and annual sci-fi presentations how the PC would look like five or ten years from now.

In a way, you could say that PC makers should be grateful that they had a 15 to 20 year run with a product that virtually changed itself on the inside, but effectively has not changed much since its invention. Just like Microsoft had a big vision in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, Apple had it the 2000s and is running with it. As a PC maker, you have now the opportunity to be simply another company that is following the pack. If you are taking risks, you have an opportunity of becoming the next Apple. Famous technologist Alan Kay once said “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.” I firmly believe in this statement. Apple is embraces it every day and has based its success on it.

The Future Is What You Make Of It

Claiming that there is no hope for the PC is silly. It is under pressure, but it is far from dying. What the PC needs is a good dose of innovation and not another iteration of “look, I am thinner and faster!” The PC needs believers and risk takers to experiment and invest in new ideas.

What could make the PC exciting again – so exciting that people are willing to wait in line for it? Do we have to change the data input model? Is the time finally ripe for voice input? What are the opportunities of 3D, an area that has conceivably just been scratched so far and is not seen with a truly innovative vision that is so compelling that we would actually want to go out and buy it? What about the next generation of a superphone that would integrate truly new features – such as Mozilla Labs’ Seabird phone? What about the platform experience? How can applications evolve with HTML5 into a new area of usability? What about the idea of a platform that is so simple to use that people can build and customize their applications to fit their individual needs? If there is one company we believe can answer those questions, it is Apple. But there is no reason why anyone else could not do the same.

As the computer has moved to become a commodity, old values such as core hardware features have become largely irrelevant to those who represent the mainstream market. Does anyone care what processor and how much memory is in an iPad? Do people care that Apple’s notebooks do not come with Intel’s fastest processors? Exactly.

The PC is due for a major innovation push that is beyond new colors. The iPad is merely a milestone in the evolution of the PC and it will be succeeded by the next great idea. In fact, if you think about the opportunity, there may have never been a greater opportunity for PC makers than today.

Source:http://www.tomshardware.com/news/tablet-pc-notebook-desktop-innovation-3d-voice,13121.html

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes