Archive for May, 2011

Computex 2011 Expected to Focus on Tablets and 3D Tech

May 30th, 2011

Computex 2011, Taipei’s annual computer expo, begins tomorrow and most industry analysts are expecting the focus to be on tablets and 3D technology.

Intel, Nvidia, Google, Asus, as well as Microsoft have all confirmed that they will be at the expo and all of these technology players are working on something for the tablet market to try and usurp Apple’s iPad dominance.

Intel promises that 10 tablets will be on display at the expo powered by its new Oak Trail mobile processor, with Digitimes reporting that one of these tablets will be launched by Acer and powered by Google’s Android OS.

Aside from tablets, the other focus of this year’s Computex expo is 3D. As the at-home 3D market is booming, both manufactures and content producers are racing to produce 3D equipment and content.

12.9 million 3D TV sets were sold last year, and every major manufacturer in attendance is set to debut a new model at this year’s show. In addition, Nvidia is set to announce new, cheaper, 3D glasses to be used in conjunction with their 3D video cards and games.

The Hardware Canucks will be bringing you complete coverage of Computex as it happens. Stay tuned, it should be an interesting week.

Source:http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/news/computex-2011/computex-2011-expected-to-focus-on-tablets-and-3d-tech/

Asus Demos Phone-tablet Combo, Meego Netbook

May 30th, 2011

Taiwan’s Asustek Computer has previewed a smartphone-tablet PC combo device that seeks to bring together the strengths of both devices without completely duplicating the hardware.

The Padfone comprises a pair of devices: a smartphone and a dumb tablet.

On its own, the handset functions as a conventional smartphone but it can be inserted into a dock built into the back of the tablet. The user can then access all the smartphone’s features and functions through the larger screen of the tablet. The tablet also includes a built-in battery that powers the device and can recharge the smartphone’s battery.

Introducing the device at the Computex IT trade fair in Taipei on Monday, Asustek Chairman Jonney Shih said his company is attempting to produce a single device that can be used in different ways. For quick messaging and making calls, the smartphone handset could be used, while web browsing and watching movies could be done through the tablet screen with the handset docked.

Asus didn’t provide any technical specifications, pricing details or a launch date for the device.

Alongside the Padfone, Asus also launched a 7-inch tablet with glasses-free 3D display. The Eee Pad MeMO 3D comes with a companion Bluetooth handset that can be used to make calls through the tablet. No price or launch date was announced.

Asus is perhaps best known as the company that created the netbook PC category. The first Eee PC was unveiled at the Computex show in 2007 and the company continues to launch new models, despite the current fashion for tablet PCs.

The latest Eee PC, called the X101, breaks new ground for Asus in terms of price and operating system.

It’s based on the Meego platform developed by Intel, features a 10.1-inch screen, Intel Atom N435 processer, and will cost US$199. A second version will be available at a higher price that boots into either Meego or Microsoft’s Windows.

Source:http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/228972/asus_demos_phonetablet_combo_meego_netbook.html

In depth: Raspberry Pi, the computer on a stick

May 27th, 2011

Raspberry Pi is a tiny ARM-based single board computer that enables a TV to run Linux and scripting languages such as Python.

Designed by Cambridge business men and academics to engage children with computer science and thereby improve the skills pool from which they draw employees and undergraduates, it is causing a stir in the developing world.

“In 1996, the average skill set of someone entering university was a couple of machine code languages and some hardware hacking experience. Now if we have someone that has written a web page we are lucky,” former University of Cambridge lecture Dr Eben Upton told Electronics Weekly.

Upton now works for a high-tech company in the same area and employs graduates:

“There are still bright kids around, but you have to find a general purpose smart person who would otherwise work for a bank, and then train them from scratch as an engineer,” he said.

Upton and five others have decided to do something about it – get them young.

“We all had that sinking feeling, that you look at any trend going in to the skills pipeline the numbers don’t look great,” he said. “Most of the factors, we can’t do anything about, so we did the one thing we could do something about and made a machine that is cheap and programmable. If someone has been programming since they were eight, they have experience baked in.”

The inspiration for Raspberry Pi comes from the pre-PC computers of the 80s, which encouraged people to programme, even when they didn’t know they wanted to.

“There is an energy barrier at the start of the learning curve,” said Upton. With the Spectrum or the BBC micro, even if you only wanted it to run a game, you turned it on and it immediately said ‘BASIC’ and you could write
>10 print “Hello world”
>20 goto 10.
A lot of us got sucked in by that and became programmers.”

PCs just don’t cut the mustard.

“Machines now start up in Windows and if you want to programme you have to go and get some tools, which you have to know how to look for,” he explained. “Its not trivial, and if its not trivial, 99% of people won’t do it

The result is a 32-bit ARM11-based computer than needs no supporting PC.

The size of a USB stick, it has an HDMI connector on one end for the TV, a USB connector at the other end for the keyboard, and it boots immediately into Linux running a scripting language.

“The ‘Hello world’ programme is the same as BASIC, and it is immensely powerful underneath,” said Upton

How powerful?

“I have received 3,000 emails since we announced Raspberry Pi and I had responded to some of them individually,” he said. “I searched for the ones I had not responded to, and sent them a standard reply, all using 10 lines of Python code.”

Python is the favoured scripting language.

“It is the least annoying scripting language, a reasonably clean scripting language that is widely supported,” said Upton.

The provisional hardware specification is: 700MHz ARM11 with 256Mbyte SDRAM and a SD/MMC/SDIO card slot, plus general-purpose I/O pins.

It supports OpenGL ES 2.0 and 1080p30 H.264 decode, plus composite video out alongside the HDMI.

“The ARM11 is tiny and very very powerful – Pretty punchy by the standard of any pre-2003 PC,” said Upton.

Prototype hardware is finished and all the software needed underneath Linux is working.

Ubuntu, Python, Iceweasel and KOffice are amongst the open source applications that have been run.

“Basically, you can download Ubuntu off the Internet and it runs on the board. The drivers are all done,” said Upton.

The hardware should cost around £15 and the founding six have put their hands in their pockets to start an educational charity called the Raspberry Pi Foundation that will develop, manufacture and distribute the computer.

Its mission is: “To promote the study of computer science and related topics, especially at school level, and to put the fun back into learning computing”, said the Foundation.

“The Foundation will be the vehicle for making the device and doing some stuff with the device, like running contests for the kids, with maybe a prize every week for the best application.”

A surprise

A significant proportion of those 3,000 emails have been from educators in less developed countries where PCs are rare but there are TVs.

“I have been quite surprised with what people want to do with the device,” said Upton.” A lot of people from the developing world want them: One from Uganda said can he have 100 of them, and a person in Peru said we want to outfit a school district with them and where do we send my money.”

The Foundation will be self-funding if it can sell 10,000 computers at the target price, estimated Upton.

“By the look of my inbox, if I had 10,000 here today and people to pack them, I would have none left tomorrow,” he said.

Why not just adopt Arduino?

“Arduino is great if you already know how to programme and you have a desktop PC,” said Upton. “It has better I/O than ours, and it is really attractive and cheap if you are a hobbyist and can build it yourself, but it has an 8 bit processor and is not very powerful.”

Source:http://www.electronicsweekly.com/Articles/2011/05/26/51140/in-depth-raspberry-pi-the-computer-on-a-stick.htm

Google takes war to rivals with launch of business computer

May 27th, 2011

Google, in a new bid to diversify its way out of an overwhelming dependence on search ad revenue, has once again taken aim at a giant in another industry.

Having disrupted the disruptor that is Apple in the smartphone arena, Google is now challenging Microsoft’s 800-pound-gorilla status in the enterprise market.

Chromebooks for Business, unveiled at the Google I/O developer’s conference in San Francisco, US, ties together a number of threads the company has been dangling — not the least of which its seemingly Quixotic venture into the computer hardware game.

But with hardware partners Samsung and Acer, Google is doing what Google does best: create a mechanism (inexpensive netbooks) that increases dependency on its cloud ecosystem — just like its advocacy of high-speed Internet connections that support its core business.
But this time there is potential revenue attached to that other agenda, and a genuinely viable business model.

For $28 a month (less for schools) you get everything you need in hardware, software and service — including machine upgrades. Those machines boot up in seconds, connect to WiFi hotspots effortlessly, can tap into Verizon’s 3G data network if necessary (at an extra cost) and are elegantly tied in with (what else?) Gmail, Google Voice, Google Docs.

Prototypes of the Chromebooks didn’t get a high-five from the tech press when they were first were doled out to a select few, and there were big questions then about why Google would want to be in a) a commodity business and b) in the segment seemingly threatened most by tablets. It just didn’t seem to make sense in the way Google’s run at Apple with Android did. Sure, cloud computing seems like the future, but maybe this is an idea whose time has not yet come.

Now that the final piece has fallen into place it seems like Google might be on to something. Part of the reason Chromebooks may work is the power of Pay One Price. With no hidden fees and sufficient customer support (more on that later) this is a real peace-of-mind play at a fraction of the cost of orbiting in the Microsoft universe.

There are lingering questions, though: Why netbooks? Even though there is some conventional wisdom that this relatively new portable class is already being killed off by tablets, the data is unclear. It’s quite likely that the full effect of disruptive introduction of the iPad won’t play out for years, and that tablets and bare-bones netbooks will be road warrior’s dynamic duo at the expense of traditional laptops.

Why not tablets? Because they aren’t proven business tools yet — even Rim markets its Blackberry companion Playbook as a plaything. Even though every person in business seems to have a tablet, full-sized hardware keyboards remain the single most important business tool.

Why rent when you can buy, cheaply? Indeed, this programme isn’t even available to consumers (yet), who need to shell out $350 and do not get support. But this is what makes it a clever enterprise play: you eliminate the original and upgrade cycle capital expenditures — and your IT department. Toss in not having to buy Microsoft Office licenses and the sort of small operations which already use Gmail and Skype will be thinking twice about buying Macs or Linux boxes. When it comes to larger companies, there are CIOs who are already talking up the cloud and who are at least willing to listen.

Google’s prospects are hard to gauge, and the big enterprise equipment and support players — Microsoft and Fujitsu — are probably not quaking in their boots just yet.

Enterprise IT is a conservative, slow-moving beast which emphasizes stability over innovation.
The x-factor may be Google’s ability to provide a high level of pacifying support.

Google’s only other foray into the hardware game was a bust: The Nexus One was supposed to upend the mobile phones business and shatter the dominance of wireless carriers, but Google abandoned the project fairly quickly.

Source:http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/-/539444/1169910/-/1232f7vz/-/

An Old Hard Drive and OS in a New PC

May 27th, 2011

Terry Marshall asked if he could move his old hard drive, unchanged, to his new home-built PC, boot his existing, “very stable” XP installation, and skip Windows 7 altogether.

The short answer is no. Here’s why:

Windows is a very hardware-specific operating system. When you install it onto a computer, it configures itself for the hardware. Unless the two PCs are physically identical, taking the hard drive out of one and using it to boot another is asking for trouble. The result will be very unstable–if it runs at all.

If your computer didn’t come with Windows pre-installed, you must install the OS from scratch. And then you have to install your applications and move over your data.

There’s another issue: Microsoft puts limits on what you can do with a single copy of Windows. If it suddenly appears to be running on new hardware, it will object.

Does that mean you have to give up your beloved XP? Not necessarily. If you installed a full, retail copy of XP onto your old computer, you can use the same CD to install it onto your new one. The installation program will probably object when you enter the license number, because the copy is on another computer, but you can call the provided 800 number and explain the situation.

As long as you promise to remove XP from the old computer in the near future, and keep that promise, there should be no trouble.

But if XP came with the old PC, the license is strictly for that computer. You can’t transfer it. You can, however, still buy XP–even if Microsoft is no longer selling it. A Google Shopping or Pricegrabber search will bring you plenty of choices.

Source:http://www.pcworld.com/article/227856/an_old_hard_drive_and_os_in_a_new_pc.html

Acer Revo 100

May 27th, 2011

Acer’s Revo 100 is a Home Theatre PC (HTPC), capable of replacing most – if not all – of the devices connected to your television today.

We’ve looked at more than a few hardware media players – devices that bring your digital movies, music and even YouTube content to your existing TV. We’ve also seen internet-enabled TVs that provide with you with a basic browsing experience plus services such as Facebook, Twitter and video chat.

Putting the interwebs into your lounge has never been easier, and years have passed since it required a bulky PC… or even a PC at all. The downside? However good those dedicated hardware solutions are, they still can’t match the flexibility of a full-blown computer. Sure, your media player or TV might have its own app store these days. Even then, you’re talking about a limited range of applications for one particular platform – nowhere near the multitude of apps available for the most basic Windows, Linux or Mac OS X PC.

I have four devices permanently plugged into my TV: a nice DVD player, cheap Freeview decoder, outdated hot-pink PS2, and an old netbook for web browsing that can’t even manage to play 720p YouTube clips. All this is tied awkwardly to a universal remote and a little wireless keyboard/touchpad combo, which works well enough, most of the time.

The Revo 100 replaced all of these devices, with less than twenty minutes’ setup, and just two plugs to connect (power to the wall, HDMI to the TV). Network was helpfully handled by the Revo 100’s Wi-Fi, though gigabit Ethernet is also provided if you prefer a wired solution.

Acer’s Revo 100 runs Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit) atop an AMD Athlon II Neo K325 dual-core processor supported by Nvidia’s ION graphics platform, so the Revo is not a hardcore performance PC. Its balance of performance, power consumption and quiet operation is, however, perfect for a lounge setting.

Because it’s equipped with a Blu-ray reader, the Revo is more than capable of churning out high definition video up to 1080p – with a suitably equipped TV, you can even watch the latest 3D movies (that can be said of any current Blu-ray player, to be fair). Those 720p YouTube clips I was missing out on before? No problem at all. Since you’re dealing with a PC and not a limited media player, you also get full support for all those flash videos beyond the walls of YouTube – assuming you install Adobe Flash Player, of course.

Chances are, your TV has its own Freeview tuner. If you’re like me, however, you might also have a separate decoder/set-top box attached to an older, Freeview-free TV. Either way, the Revo has its own built-in digital TV tuner. Even if your TV already has the functionality, you do get one advantage from connecting the Revo instead: Windows Media Center allows you to record your favourite shows to the Revo’s 500-gigabyte hard drive. If your TV does have its own tuner, you can of course record one programme with the Revo while watching another on your TV – just like MySky, only free.

Setup was easy, and Media Center happily picked up all of our local TV channels – even with my dodgy, dodgy TV antenna connection at home, that has defeated more than a few TV receivers. The only downside I found? You can’t get the full 14-day Electronic Programme Guide (EPG) through Windows Media Center without some serious workaroundery (which I could probably manage, but goes well beyond the limits of my patience). You can still see what shows are on now, but working out when Man vs. Wild is on so you can schedule a recording? You’re still going to need the TV Guide.

You might note that I mentioned the Revo could also replace my old PS2. Well… that was almost entirely true for me, but your experiences will vary. All I play these days is Lego Star Wars, the PC version of which will happily run on a machine of the Revo’s spec. Being Windows-based, the Revo will even let you use an Xbox controller (or any gamepad, for that matter) for a realistic game-console experience.

The Acer Revo 100 will not replace your high-powered PS3 or Xbox 360. You are not going to run Crysis 2 on it, no matter how hard you try (by all means, overclocking enthusiasts, prove me wrong). Minecraft? There you might have better luck.

The Revo can do a lot. But to get the most of it, do you need an unwieldy keyboard and mouse setup, tucked awkwardly beside the couch?

Nope.

Acer has put together the most novel controller I’ve ever seen ship with a PC. The “RevoPad”, about the size of a CD jewel case, slides out of the Revo itself (funnily enough, from right beside the CD drive). It’s a touchpad, keyboard, cheeseboard and coaster in one, though I don’t think Acer would approve of those latter two uses.
In all seriousness, the RevoPad is a slim and lightweight multitouch pad, similar in size and operation to the Magic Trackpad introduced by Apple last year. The RevoPad one-ups Apple’s offering with a dual-mode design: tap a button in the top-right corner, and a light-up keyboard appears. Tap-to-type and you’ll be browsing the web, tweeting and updating your Facebook page without a scrap of effort.

The RevoPad is a brilliant idea and a gorgeous piece of tech, but its execution is so-so. I found the touchpad not nearly as responsive as it should be, and the total lack of delineation between keys means typing is an awkward affair at best. Worse, though, is the lack of controls for Windows Media Player in the RevoPad’s keyboard mode. I spent five minutes looking for a “menu” button to return to the home menu of a DVD before being ordered by my movie-watching-compatriot to eject the disc and put it into the old-fashioned DVD player. (The words used may have been less appropriate for magazine publication.)

The Revo 100 is built around Windows Media Center. Acer’s Clear.fi software (essentially a DLNA server – check out our jargon buster on page 46) integrates with Windows Media Center. So why, when designing a totally custom controller for the system, did they not include the full set of controls found on a Windows Media Center remote? It’s an inexcusable omission, and the only thing that stops this excellent machine from earning a PC World Platinum award.

Source:http://pcworld.co.nz/pcworld/pcw.nsf/reviews/acer-revo-100

Why doesn’t Microsoft push Windows to Mac users?

May 27th, 2011

Something odd struck me the other day. I was thinking about putting Windows on one of the Mac mini systems to run in Boot Camp. Why? Because my youngest daughter is learning to play the keyboard, and while she spends most of her time in GarageBand, she does have some software she wants to use that is Windows only. Installing Windows on the Mac sounds like the best solution. This got me thinking … Microsoft does a lot of those PC vs. Mac comparison type ads … but why do we never see Microsoft trying to sell Windows licenses direct to Mac users?

Here Microsoft has cherry-picked PCs with the idea of making the Mac look bad in comparison (although why it chooses to show criteria where the Mac beats the PC, such as battery life in the example above, doesn’t make sense to me). The idea is that Microsoft pimps OEM hardware, and from each PC sale it gets dollars from the license fee (it gets that license fee anyway, whether it pimps the hardware of not … but I guess it needs to drum up sales every so often).

But here’s the thing, Microsoft sells the OEMs Windows licenses at a cheap price. The bigger the OEM, the cheaper the deal. How much OEMs pay per license is not disclosed, but figures that are thrown around put is at around $30 – 40 per system.

Now, you might think that this is a pretty good haul, but compare this to a retail license. A retail copy of Windows 7 Home Premium costs $200, while Ultimate costs $275. Now, Microsoft doesn’t get all this cash, but I’m pretty sure that it makes more than $40 per sale. There are a lot of Mac users out there who have come from a PC background that might like to still run Windows on their shiny new Mac.

Microsoft’s got it all wrong. Rather than pimping OEM hardware (OEMs can do that for themselves), Microsoft should start targeting Mac users. How? A big photo of a MacBook Pro, and underneath that something like ‘Did you know you can run Windows on your Mac?’ Microsoft’s always claiming that Mac users are throwing money away needlessly when buying a Mac, why not encourage them to throw some more money away?

Go on Microsoft, start telling Mac users what they’re missing and rustle up a few more dollars.

Source:http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/why-doesnt-microsoft-push-windows-to-mac-users/12987

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes