Archive for February, 2011

Dell executive: to pursue acquisitions related to storage, servers

February 16th, 2011

Dell Inc. (DELL) will keep up its pace of acquisitions including by seeking acquisitions that would provide intellectual property in the areas of servers, storage and services, chief marketing officer for Dell’s consumer and small and medium business division Paul-Henri Ferrand said Wednesday.

Ferrand, who was speaking during a teleconference, declined to elaborate.

The current cycle of corporate technology hardware replacement, which has benefited Dell and other computer makers, is likely to continue for two years, Ferrand said.

Source:http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110215-719983.html

Best graphics cards for the money: february 2011

February 10th, 2011

Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great—that is, if you have the time to do the research. But at the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget.

So, if you don’t have the time to research the benchmarks, or if you don’t feel confident enough in your ability to pick the right card, then fear not. We at Tom’s Hardware have come to your aid with a simple list of the best gaming cards offered for the money.

February Updates:

There was one major graphics launch last month: Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 560 Ti. In summary, this new card offers the performance of GeForce GTX 470 with the power signature (roughly) of a GeForce GTX 460. It’s based on the new GF114 GPU, which is essentially a re-spun GF104 with all of its 384 CUDA cores enabled, plus 64 texture units and 32 ROPs.

In comparison, the GeForce GTX 460’s GF104 graphics processor had one of its streaming multiprocessors disabled, resulting in cut-back 336 CUDA cores and 56 texture units. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti also sports relatively high 822/1644/1002 MHz core/shader/memory frequencies. The bottom line? At $250, this card offers a great price/performance ratio, just like the GeForce GTX 470, but with lower power usage. This card gets our recommendation out of the gate, and you can read more about it in: Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti Review: GF114 Rises, GF100 Rides Off. On a side note, Nvidia resurrected the premium Ti suffix with this card. We suspect this move was made with an eye to the future, so lesser models based on the same GPU might be designated with a different name (hopefully to avoid confusion, rather than to create more of it).

The same day that Nvidia announced its GeForce GTX 560 Ti, AMD launched a Radeon HD 6950 1 GB to counter it. In testing, we found the 1 GB card is every bit as fast as the pricier 2 GB version. It only gives up performance at quality levels that exceed the 1 GB frame buffer (Metro 2033 with 4xAA and High Quality settings, in our experience). Frankly, that’s a more attractive value play than the 2 GB model. That is, unless you’re interested in trying to soft-mod your 2 GB board into a Radeon HD 6970.

We’ve seen a lot of reported success modding AMD’s Radeon HD 6950 2 GB to a full Radeon HD 6970 2 GB with a BIOS flash. Both of these cards are based on the exact same Cayman GPU, but the Radeon HD 6950 is crippled, with two of its 24 SIMD engines disabled. AMD can choose to purposely handicap its GPUs physically or via firmware. Apparently, the retail Radeon HD 6950s currently available are soft-moddable for the most part, and can be unlocked with a relatively simple BIOS flash.

The real beauty of this is that the 6900-series cards come with a BIOS-backup switch. So, if a flash fails, there’s a way to resurrect the card. Keep in mind that there’s always a chance of damaging your hardware or rendering it unstable with such an update. After all, there’s no guarantee that the disabled SIMDs passed validation to begin with. On top of this, AMD could very well be scrambling to change the way it disables logic on the 2 GB Radeon HD 6950s, and unlocked cards might dry up at retail. There’s certainly no guarantee that the card you buy will be easily modified.

Successful modification results in a card with the full 1536 shader processors and 96 texture units enabled, just like the Radeon HD 6970, although some modified BIOS files out there allow the card to run the 6950’s lower 1250 MHz GDDR5 memory speed.

There have been relatively few price changes, and that’s likely a result of the very crowded (and competitive) mid-range. There’s simply not as much room for prices to shift with fast products in each pertinent segment and few obvious holes left. We have seen a few deals on Newegg that stand out, so we’ll mention them: we found a Palit GeForce 9800 GT for $60, which is about $45 less than other models. And according to its specs, it’s a fully-functional 112-shader card that will outperform a Radeon HD 5670. There’s also a Diamond Radeon HD 5870 for $235, which is very impressive when you consider that this card is notably faster than the Radeon HD 6870 and about as fast as the Radeon HD 6950. The prices of these cards are an anomaly compared to the rest of the playing field, so we can’t give them full recommendations in the list below. As individual values, they’re uncontested, though.

Some Notes About Our Recommendations

A few simple guidelines to keep in mind when reading this list:

This list is for gamers who want to get the most for their money. If you don’t play games, then the cards on this list are more expensive than what you really need. We’ve added a reference page at the end of the column covering integrated graphics processors, which is likely more apropos.
The criteria to get on this list are strictly price/performance. We acknowledge that recommendations for multiple video cards, such as two Radeon cards in CrossFire mode or two GeForce cards in SLI, typically require a motherboard that supports CrossFire or SLI and a chassis with more space to install multiple graphics cards. They also require a beefier power supply compared to what a single card needs, and will almost certainly produce more heat than a single card. Keep these factors in mind when making your purchasing decision. In most cases, if we have recommended a multiple-card solution, we try to recommend a single-card honorable mention at a comparable price point for those who find multi-card setups undesirable.
Prices and availability change on a daily basis. We can’t base our decisions on always-changing pricing information, but we can list some good cards that you probably won’t regret buying at the price ranges we suggest, along with real-time prices from our PriceGrabber engine, for your reference.
The list is based on some of the best U.S. prices from online retailers. In other countries or at retail stores, your mileage will most certainly vary.
These are new card prices. No used or open-box cards are in the list; they might represent a good deal, but it’s outside the scope of what we’re trying to do.

Source:http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-6950-1gb-geforce-gtx-560-ti-gaming-graphics-card,2857.html#xtor=RSS-182

Asus p8p67 deluxe (intel p67 express) motherboard review

February 10th, 2011

One thing about the Sandy Bridge launch that has been different about any other CPU launch that I have covered has been how many motherboards were launched at the same time.

I was shocked at the number that came in even before the CPUs arrived. Still, it is a good thing in most respects as it gives you plenty of choices unlike a few other CPU launches that I can think of.

For our third P67 board review we stay inside the ASUS camp, but move a little down the ladder firmly into the upper end of the consumer market. Here we find the P8P67 Deluxe. This board comes complete with Digi+ VRM, EPU and the TPU for what ASUS calls this Dual Intelligent Processors with DIGI+ VRM.

But that is not all you get with this new board from ASUS. You get a front panel USB 3.0 box, SLI and Crossfire, Dual GBe LAN (one of these is an Intel LAN chip), and a built in Bluetooth module. Not to mention the performance and overclocking that comes with most ASUS motherboards.

So despite the current issues with the Sandy Bridge MCP, let’s dive into the ASUS P8P67 Deluxe and see if it deserves its place at the top of the consumer ladder.

Source:http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3829/asus_p8p67_deluxe_intel_p67_express_motherboard_review/index.html

Intel to retire old 45nm chips

February 10th, 2011

Intel is to place several processors at End of Life status, the processors effected are various 45nm desktop processors, including the the Pentium E5400, E6500, the Core 2 Duo E7400, E8400, and the quad-core Core 2 Quad Q8300, Q8400, Q8400S, Q9505, Q9550, Q9550S and Q9650.

Orders of the boxed editions will be valid until August 26, 2011after which supplies will run out, tray processors will stop shipping on February 10, 2012.

Source:http://www.guru3d.com/news/intel-to-retire-old-45nm-chips/

Dell inspiron duo hybrid tablet / netbook review

February 10th, 2011

The Dell Inspiron Duo is an impressive sight. It’s not often that we’re this enamored by a device’s physical design, but the Dell Inspiron Duo simply does it for us. The machine is a feat of engineering, and it really redefines the convertible laptop segment. This 10.1″ machine is part netbook, part tablet, but unlike many rivals, it doesn’t compromise much in terms or portability and form factor to be both. When you open up the package, it looks like a Mini 10 or any other 10″ netbook.

But once the lid is open, a simple press on the LCD allows it to swivel around and lock into place, in reverse. Close the lid back down atop the keyboard, and you’re now looking at a tablet. It’s one of the more innovative notebook designs we’ve seen in recent memory, and we cannot applaud Dell’s engineering team enough for both thinking of this implementation and nailing it with such precision.

Source:http://hothardware.com/Reviews/Dell-Inspiron-Duo-Convertible-Tablet–Netbook-Review/

Galaxis atlus mid tower chassis review

February 10th, 2011

I know when we took a look at the ARES from Galaxis a lot of the finer details such as pricing and availability were sketchy at best. Today I have more information about the chassis in the Galaxis lineup, and I am pleased to bring you yet another mid tower chassis from Galaxis. Looking at the ARES, I saw some things that were right as rain for the design, but I also found a couple of finer points that make the case a little tough to use, depending on hardware. But all in all, it was still a decent case for the price.

Tool-less devices are always handy, and almost all cases are moving to this type of setup. Then there is the bright flood of LED lighting that encompasses the interior of the chassis as well as adding a glow to the room. These LEDs are built into a few fans around the chassis, but the 180mm fan on the door provides most of the visible coloring. Those ideas weren’t lost in the latest design either.

Today we are taking a close look at the Atlus from Galaxis. Now, this is sort of the “little brother” to the ARES, but don’t let that fool you. I based that comment on pricing alone. While the ARES has its own look, the Atlus provides a less flashy exterior, but keeps most components of the ARES; just this time, ever so slightly different. I say we dive right into the specifications, get the pricing and availability out of the way, so we can get a better look at the Atlus from Galaxis.

Source:http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3823/galaxis_atlus_mid_tower_chassis/index.html

Samsung LN32C350

February 10th, 2011

The good: Reproduced slightly deeper black levels than a competing LCD; matte screen works well in bright lighting; handles 1080p/24 sources properly; solid picture adjustment options; USB port for photos and audio.
The bad: Uneven screen uniformity; dark areas tinged somewhat blue; subpar standard-def processing; just one analog video input.
The bottom line: A USB port and decent performance set the small Samsung LNC350 series apart from the entry-level pack.
Comparing the Samsung LNC350 with the Sony KDL-BX300, another entry-level name-brand 720p LCD, we give the Sony the slight nod in picture quality. That said, the Samsung is plenty “good enough” for its price range, and offers one extra the Sony and most other sets at this level lack: a USB port for easy photo display and music playback. For a bedroom-size model without frills like LED backlight or 1080p resolution, the LNC350 series fits the bill nicely.
Series information: We performed a hands-on evaluation of the 32-inch LN32C350, but this review also applies to the smaller 22-inch LN22C350. The two have identical specs and should provide very similar picture quality.

The Samsung stands taller than the Sony BX300, and although we didn’t like its look as much, it does offer a few more curves than the blocky Sony.

An accent lip separates the glossy bottom of the frame from the matte speaker bar, and while the oval-base stand looks like a swivel job, it’s not. Panel depth is pretty slim, however, and this is one of the lighter non-LEDs you’ll find.

While we liked the larger remote on the Sony BX300 series better than that of this Samsung, the latter’s stubby clicker is fine for the job. Button layout was clear enough and there were no missing keys, aside from Play/Pause and so on, so the clicker can’t control other gear via HDMI-CEC or infrared.
The transparent menu system is excellent, with thoughtfully divided sections and easy access to all functions. We especially appreciated the onscreen menu explanations and the large, clear text for selections. There’s a Tools menu for shortcuts to picture and sound modes, as well as the sleep timer.

The Samsung outdoes many other entry-level LCDs by including a USB port, which allows it to display digital photos and play music from a connected USB thumbdrive–it can’t handle video files, however.
Otherwise the feature set is bare-bones. It has a native resolution of 720p, and at this screen size there’s little reason for more pixels, aside from utility as a PC monitor. Its lack of an LED backlight isn’t much of a hindrance in our view either; power use for this small TV is relatively minor anyway.

As usual Samsung’s selection of adjustments is excellent, despite the presence of fewer picture modes than some other makes. There are nearly as many tweaks available on this entry-level model as on the company’s higher-end TVs, and as usual we appreciated gamma and the fine color temperature controls most.

While it lacks the array of power-saving options found on the Sony BX300, namely auto-off and sound-only modes, the Samsung does have an Auto power saver option said to monitor the image and adjust the backlight accordingly. There’s no ambient light sensor, though.

Source:http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/samsung-ln32c350/4505-6482_7-34001741.html?subj=fdba&part=rss&tag=rb_content;rb_mtx_Search+Results#reviewPage1

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes