Archive for October, 2010

Amd comments on graphics chips market in q3 2010

October 30th, 2010

Shipments of graphics adapters in Q3 2010 were below expectations and below shipments in the second quarter. What is it? A sign of new weakness in the global economy?

Or just a temporary correction caused by local factors? Let us try to find it out with a vice president of the leading supplier of standalone graphics processors – Advanced Micro Devices – who kindly answered questions of X-bit labs.

Traditionally, sales of graphics adapters in general and standalone graphics processing units (GPUs) in particular top in the third quarter.

There are many reasons for that: loads of consumers buy new equipment during the back-to-school season, large OEMs are forming their lineups for the final months of the year, some companies begin to think about Christmas season and some people simply buy new graphics boards to play the latest video games for PC.

This was not exactly so in Q3 2010, according to recently released market share and shipments numbers by Mercury Research.

It appeared that shipments of discrete graphics cards increased a bit, but sales of standalone mobile graphics processors were down significantly.

To make the matters worse, sales of chipsets with integrated graphics processors (IGPs) dropped significantly.

In overall, the whole market of graphics adapters dropped by 4.9%, according to Mercury Research, a leading graphics chips market tracking firm.

Some of the numbers of the Mercury Research report (which can be viewed in our news-stores: 1, 2) were so surprising that we decided to ask leading suppliers of graphics processing units – AMD and Nvidia – about them.

Fortunately, we have managed to ask some questions to Matt Skynner, corporate vice president and general manager of GPU division at AMD.

Unfortunately, Nvidia is in its quiet period at the moment and it cannot answer any market or financial performance-related questions even briefly.

Let us find out, what was hot for AMD’s ATI unit back in the third quarter and what was not!

Source:http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/amd-comments-q3-2010.html

Asustek to unleash tablets powered by microsoft, google, intel, and nvidia against the ipad

October 30th, 2010

As Joe Stalin once said, sometimes quantity has a quality all its own.

Research In Motion’s Playbook tablet is coming early next year.

Samsung will start selling the Galaxy Tab in November.

Now Asustek Computer President Jerry Shen says he plans to launch five — FIVE! — tablets next year. Take that Steve Jobs.

Shen, of course, is just hitting back at the iPad, the biggest threat to the netbook market his company pioneered with the Eee PC.

The small cheap notebooks sold well during the worst of the recession, but their momentum has begun to slow, lately, thanks in part to Apple’s iPad.

So what’s the winning combination of hardware and software? Shen told Taiwan’s DigiTimes that he basically plans to try them all.

First up, a 12-inch model using an Microsoft’s Windows operating system and Intel processors.

Then two 7-inch models and two 9-inch models will arrive in March.

One of the 9-inch models will feature Nvidia’s Tegra 2 system on a chip package and Google’s Android operating system.

We’ll find out soon if diversity really is a strength.

Source:http://blogs.forbes.com/briancaulfield/2010/10/29/asustek-to-unleash-tablets-powered-by-microsoft-google-intel-and-nvidia-against-the-ipad/

The world’s fastest supercomputer now belongs to china

October 30th, 2010

Unveiled today at the Annual Meeting of National High Performance Computing (HPC China 2010) in Beijing, Tianhe-1A is the world’s fastest supercomputer with a performance record of 2.507 petaflops, as measured by the LINPACK benchmark.

Tianhe-1A was designed by the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT) in China, and it is already fully operational.

To achieve the new performance record, Tianhe-1A uses 7,168 Nvidia Tesla M2050 GPUs and 14,336 Intel Xeon CPUs.

It cost $88 million; its 103 cabinets weigh 155 tons, and the entire system consumes 4.04 megawatts of electricity.

Tianhe-1A ousted the previous record holder, Cray XT5 Jaguar, which is used by the U.S. National Center for Computational Sciences at Oak Ridge National Laboratories.

It is powered by 224,162 Opteron CPUs and achieves a performance record of 1.75 petaflops.

According to Nvidia, Tianhe-1A will be operated as an open access system to use for large scale scientific computations.

Source:http://mashable.com/2010/10/28/fastest-supercomputer-china/

Ncsa director: GPU is future of supercomputing

October 30th, 2010

The director of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications has seen the future of supercomputing and it can be summed up in three letters: GPU.

Thom Dunning, who directs the NCSA and the Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies at the famed supercomputing facilities on the campus of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, says high-performance computing will begin to move toward graphics processing units or GPUs.

Not coincidentally, this is exactly what China has done to achieve the world’s fastest speeds with its “Tianhe-1A” supercomputer.

That computer combines about 7,000 Nvidia GPUs with 14,000 Intel CPUs: the only hybrid CPU-GPU system in the world of that scale.

“What we’re really seeing in the efforts in China as well as the ones we have in the U.S. is that GPUs are what the future will look like,” said Dunning in a phone interview Thursday.

“What we’re seeing is the beginning of something that’s going to be happening all over the world.”

NCSA already has a small CPU-GPU hybrid system. “It’s something we have been working on for a number of years. We have a CPU-GPU cluster for the NCSA academic community.

Made up of Intel CPUs and Nvidia GPUs. A 50 teraflop machine,” he said. (Note that Oak Ridge National Laboratories is also installing a hybrid system now.)

But it’s not going to be a snap to tap into the processing potential of GPUs. “Programming these machines to do [GPU] calculations is still a very substantial effort.

There will be some applications that will be rewritten to use GPUs [but] a lot of times it will be only part of an application that will use it so you won’t get nearly the power and computing advantage of running it all on the GPU,” he said.

The catalyst to move programmers en masse toward GPUs will be when chips appear that combine both high-performance CPU and high-level GPU functions on the same piece of silicon, Dunning said.

“If they start to solve some of these other problems like putting [the GPU and CPU] together on a chip, that’s when you’ll start to see a lot software rewritten,” according to Dunning.

“That combination will address a number of the more significant shortcomings that we currently see in these CPU-GPU combinations.

Basically, the way they’re implemented presently is a very small pipe between [the CPU and GPU] and that really restricts the effectiveness with which you can use the GPU,” he said.

He continued. “What we’ll find is that the AMDs, the Intels, the IBMs, they will start incorporating some of those features into the chips that they manufacture.

AMD has an architecture called Fusion. It’s going to be [available] fairly soon.”

Dunning also mentioned IBM’s Power7 processor–which includes some vector processing units, like GPUs use–and Intel SSE technology. ”

If you restructure your code to work well on the GPU, you find it actually performs better on the CPU because you can take advantage of some of these new vector units,” he said.

Intel, AMD, IBM, and Nvidia chips will all vie to get inside future supercomputers but Intel has one distinct advantage, according to Dunning. “They have much easier programming models.

More standard programming models. The real issue in GPUs right now besides this very narrow pipe is the difficulty of programming them.

At University of Illinois, we’ve seen pretty dramatic speed-ups in the performance of GPUs but only if you make a very substantial investment in people who are reprogramming them,” he said.

Source:http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-20021232-64.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20

Free windows server memory for hyper-v

October 30th, 2010

So Windows (like most OSes) maintains a number of caches where it keeps in RAM frequently accessed disk contents (as well as a few other things).

Normally these are not adjustable- it just uses extra free memory for this to improve performance, and the minute you actually need the memory, it is freed up and available to a real program.

Hyper-V puts a little twist in this.

When you create or start up a new VM, it needs the full memory as hard-allocated memory to that VM and apparently it doesn’t force a cache clear if there isn’t enough memory available.

We are building a bunch of stuff on 48GB servers and initially thought we would easily be able to put 3x 15GB VMs on them- the remaining 3GB would be plenty for the OS that basically wasn’t doing anything.

But at times we have found the Cached memory is as high as 20GB (after a bunch of big file copies, usually of VHD images), and the machine doesn’t have enough free RAM to boot the target VMs.

Any thoughts on how we can clear this?

Dynamic memory coming in future releases should fix this issue, but for now it would be great if we could just run a cache clear/flush right before VM start time.

Source:http://www.alexhopmann.com/2010/10/29/free-windows-server-memory-for-hyper-v/

Data backups: know your options

October 30th, 2010

These days, the question is not whether or when to back up your data. It’s how best to do it. The number of options for safeguarding your data via backups is daunting — and that’s the trouble.

Just look at the backup utility market today, and you’ll see programs that perform full system backups, image backups, individual document backups, and application-specific backups. Which type is best for you? To answer that question, you need to know the pros and cons of each backup type. Read on to find out.

** Non-proprietary backups Most backup programs available today will stuff your data into a proprietary backup format, requiring you to have and use the same program to restore your data that you used to back it up. That, of course, is not always convenient, and it constitutes another step in a data restoration procedure that you’ll have to remember in order to be able to successfully retrieve your data.

That’s why, for many, there’s real value in a program that simply creates a duplicate copy of your files on another drive. With such a backup, you can simply access the duplicate copies with Windows Explorer or another file manager and restore them as easily as you can copy files.

There are a few routes that you can take to get duplicate copies of your files made. One, of course, is just to manually copy your most valuable files using a file manager.

That approach, while free, only works if you remember to perform the task regularly. A better option for most is to use a backup program such as Second Copy that automatically backs up your data in a non-proprietary format.

Second Copy gives you all the convenience of a backup program — with features such as scheduling and automation — but won’t make you feel as though your backups are in some inaccessible format.

Another, similar option is to use a file synchronisation tool, which will also make a non-proprietary copy of your files in a location of your choice. In addition, a file synchronisation application will ensure that changes made to one or both of the folders that contain your files stay in sync.

Good tools for synchronisation include Super Flexible File Synchroniser and Microsoft’s SyncToy , which is free to registered Windows users.

The primary downside of creating duplicate copy backups is storage space. You’ll need twice the storage space required for your main files, since no compression whatsoever will be used in the creation of the backups.

Another potential disadvantage is that you may not be able to use the duplicate copy method to do a full system restoration because the hidden files and boot up files required to successfully start an operating system may not be part of the backup.

** Image backups Image backups are popular with those who want their entire systems backed up in a way that allows them to restore everything — operating system, configured applications, and files — in the event of a system meltdown. With image backups, you typically have to create and use a “restore disk” in order to access the backup file once it is created.

That backup file is typically stored on an external drive or a location that is separate from the main system disk to which you want to restore your original files.

Once you boot from the system restore disk, which is a self-created CD or DVD, you can access the backup file and restore your computer to the exact state it was in before you experienced some type of data catastrophe.

Well-regarded system imaging tools include Acronis True Image Home , Symantec Ghost , and Microsoft’s imaging utility built in to Windows 7.

Restoring an entire system from an image backup requires that you restore to the same computer or one with identical hardware.

Otherwise, the operating system may not boot. Image backups are therefore a poor option for those interested primarily in backing up critical files in order to transfer them to a new computer.

** Complete system backups Complete system backups, like image backups, copy everything on your computer but typically make it easier than image backup software to selectively restore particular files or folders.

For Windows users, the best automated complete system backup solution is Windows Home Server , available via HP’s MediaSmart line of personal servers. An able standalone system backup tool is NTI’s Backup Now .

** Specific data backups It can also make good sense to keep separate backups of particular types of data, such as e-mail, financial information, internet bookmarks, or other application-specific data that you might need quick access to in order to port it to another machine or to restore it separately from full system backups.

While you can make such application-specific backups with a traditional backup program, selectively choosing the files and folders to secure, doing so can be difficult and time-consuming.

That’s because actually finding the places on your hard drive where certain applications store all related files is frequently not self-evident.

AJ Systems’ Eazy Backup will secure the data from a number of popular applications, including Outlook, Thunderbird, Quicken, RoboForm, and many others. NinjaSoft’s Presto Transfer , similarly, focuses on backing up — and transferring — the data files from dozens of specific applications.

Source:http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/internet/article859132.ece

Nvidia Unveils 3D Technologies in India

October 30th, 2010

At an event held in Mumbai, Nvidia has brought 3D technology to Indian homes with its 3D Vision supporting PCs, 3D glasses, and 3DTV Play software. Giving a true taste of 3D experience, the new 3D Vision technology would be supported by popular OEMs like Acer, Alienware, Asus, BenQ, Connoiseur, Delhi, Fuji, HCL, Panasonic, Samsung, Sony and ViewSonic. At the launch, Dell showed the new range of XPS laptops. Also, first 3D LED gaming monitor BenQ XL2410 was announced and Panasonic promised 50-inch Viera 3DTV.

Nvidia 3D Vision technology is a combination of graphics processor unit, special 3D glasses, software and certified displays as well as monitors. Gaming in 3D, watching 3D online videos, photos, 3D Blu-ray movies and other HD content will surely change your perspective towards the content. Nvidia has also launched new Nvidia 3DTV Play software that enables an average GeForce GPU card to shell out 3D experience. This software would be available as an upgrade to the existing PC system for select preconfigured PCs and for 3D Visions PCs.

Dell showed off the new line up of XPS laptops with 3D Vision technology preconfigured on them. New Dell XPS laptops with 3D vision will be available in 14-inch, 15.6-inch and 17-inch models. These models will have an option to choose from Intel Core i5 and Core i7 processors with Optimus technology compatible Nvidia GeForce 400M graphics chips. Nvidia Optimus technology automatically switches workloads between the discrete graphics and integrated graphics for optimum utilization of system. Plus, it also conserves battery life.

The starting price for the new the XPS 14 model is $899 (Rs. 40, 050 approx.), XPS 15 model is $849 (Rs. 37, 820 approx.) and XPS 17 model is $949 (Rs. 42,270 approx). These models are already available in U.S. and on Dell.com but we re yet to get details on their Indian availability and pricing.

BenQ also announced the first ever 3D LED 120Hz gaming monitor XL2410T for the Indian audience. Nvidia 3D Vision certified 23.6-inch LED gaming monitor has been prepared with the help of ZOWIE, a professional gaming gear manufacturer. Two legendary Counter-Strike players – Emil HeatoN Christensen and Abdisamad SpawN Mohamed, have jointly developed the FPS mode in the Gaming Display Modes. This monitor is expected to be made available by next month.

Finally, Panasonic announced a 50-inch Viera 3DTV but the model number wasn’t announced. These Nvidia 3D Vision certified PCs, and Displays would be made available from next month onwards in India. Stay tuned to this space for product specific pricing and other details.

Source:-http://www.techtree.com/India/News/Nvidia_Unveils_3D_Technologies_in_India/551-113280-893.html

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes